Detailed Information on Publication Record
2024
Intentional Automobility: Mobility Choice Between Socialist and Postsocialist Chrononormativity
SEIDENGLANZ, Daniel, Robert OSMAN and Jiří MALÝBasic information
Original name
Intentional Automobility: Mobility Choice Between Socialist and Postsocialist Chrononormativity
Authors
SEIDENGLANZ, Daniel (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Robert OSMAN (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Jiří MALÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis, 2024, 2469-4452
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50701 Cultural and economic geography
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.900 in 2022
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
UT WoS
001080344900001
Keywords in English
chrononormativity; decision-making; intentional automobility; multiplicity of durations; non-Western experience
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 11/1/2024 08:08, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.
Abstract
V originále
This article responds to the uncritical use of chronological time and the strict division between past, present, and future when thinking about mobility behavior or mobility decisions. On the basis of this critique, it introduces the concept of intentional automobility, which relies on the Bergsonian–Deleuzian conception of time—duration (la durée). It shows that transport-mode decisions are not only made in the present, separated from the past and the future, but that the past and the future are part of every such decision. Using the example of the metropolitan area of Brno, Czech Republic, a postsocialist space, we show how differently socialist and postsocialist societies can be temporally normalized. At the same time, contemporary postsocialist mobility decisions are still influenced by socialist time norms—chrononormatives. Our main research question is how everyday mobility decisions between the car and public transport are influenced by the temporal norms of the society. To answer this question, we have employed a mixed methods research design that has been divided into a quantitative analysis of mode choice for individual trips and a qualitative analysis of statements about mode choice. Key findings include the relationship between transport-mode preference and a particular chrononormative. We identify four contexts—time, routing, alcohol, and everyday activity planning—in which the chrononormatives associated with the car and public transport are substitutable. It is on this basis that we introduce intentional automobility.
Links
GA17-16097S, research and development project |
|