NEPIVODOVÁ, Linda. Computer or Paper? A Comparison of Two Modes of Test Administration. Online. 1st ed. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2023. Cizí jazyky a jejich didaktiky : teorie, empirie, praxe ; volume 12. ISBN 978-80-280-0292-3. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M280-0292-2023.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Computer or Paper? A Comparison of Two Modes of Test Administration
Authors NEPIVODOVÁ, Linda.
Edition 1. vyd. Brno, Cizí jazyky a jejich didaktiky : teorie, empirie, praxe ; volume 12, 2023.
Publisher Masarykova univerzita
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Book on a specialized topic
Field of Study 50300 5.3 Education
Country of publisher Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form electronic version available online
WWW Čítárna Munispace
ISBN 978-80-280-0292-3
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M280-0292-2023
Keywords (in Czech) computer-based testing; pencil and paper-based testing; student perceptions; comparison of results; attitudes
Keywords in English computer-based testing; pencil and paper-based testing; student perceptions; comparison of results; attitudes
Tags Munipress
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Martina Švaříčková Hlavatá, učo 13047. Changed: 19/10/2023 14:49.
Abstract
The text compares first year university students’ compulsory English achievement tests written in two modes of administration, i.e. pencil and paper and computer-based tests (PPT and CBT). The central research question investigated is whether the usage of computer-based language testing is justified in such a context. It first maps the theoretical discourse and comments on selected fundamental aspects of language testing practices, significant for the comparison itself. A mixed methods design is employed, where quantitative test data is used to measure the equivalency of the two modes and qualitative self-report feedback form data explores the main advantages and disadvantages of these, as viewed by the students examined.
PrintDisplayed: 4/7/2024 14:32