Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Optimizing biomarkers for accurate ependymoma diagnosis, prognostication, and stratification within International Clinical Trials: A BIOMECA study
CHAPMAN, Rebecca J, David R GHASEMI, Felipe ANDREIUOLO, Valentina ZSCHERNACK, Tauziede Espariat ARNAULT et. al.Basic information
Original name
Optimizing biomarkers for accurate ependymoma diagnosis, prognostication, and stratification within International Clinical Trials: A BIOMECA study
Authors
CHAPMAN, Rebecca J, David R GHASEMI, Felipe ANDREIUOLO, Valentina ZSCHERNACK, Tauziede Espariat ARNAULT, Francesca R BUTTARELLI, Felice GIANGASPERO, Jacques GRILL, Christine HABERLER, Simon M L PAINE, Ian SCOTT, Thomas S JACQUES, Martin SILL, Stefan PFISTER, John-Paul KILDAY, Pierre LEBLOND, Maura MASSIMINO, Hendrik WITT, Piergiorgio MODENA, Pascale VARLET, Torsten PIETSCH, Richard G GRUNDY, Kristian W PAJTLER and Timothy A RITZMANN
Edition
Neuro-Oncology, Cary, Oxford University Press, 2023, 1522-8517
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30230 Other clinical medicine subjects
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 15.900 in 2022
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:90249/23:00132051
UT WoS
000989756200001
Keywords (in Czech)
brain tumors; biomarkers; Ependymoma; neuro-oncology; paediatric
Keywords in English
brain tumors; biomarkers; Ependymoma; neuro-oncology; paediatric
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 12/4/2024 12:59, Mgr. Michal Petr
Abstract
V originále
Background Accurate identification of brain tumor molecular subgroups is increasingly important. We aimed to establish the most accurate and reproducible ependymoma subgroup biomarker detection techniques, across 147 cases from International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) Ependymoma II trial participants, enrolled in the pan-European "Biomarkers of Ependymoma in Children and Adolescents (BIOMECA)" study. Methods Across 6 European BIOMECA laboratories, we evaluated epigenetic profiling (DNA methylation array); immunohistochemistry (IHC) for nuclear p65-RELA, H3K27me3, and Tenascin-C; copy number analysis via fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and MLPA (1q, CDKN2A), and MIP and DNA methylation array (genome-wide copy number evaluation); analysis of ZFTA- and YAP1-fusions by RT-PCR and sequencing, Nanostring and break-apart FISH. Results DNA Methylation profiling classified 65.3% (n = 96/147) of cases as EPN-PFA and 15% (n = 22/147) as ST-ZFTA fusion-positive. Immunohistochemical loss of H3K27me3 was a reproducible and accurate surrogate marker for EPN-PFA (sensitivity 99%-100% across 3 centers). IHC for p65-RELA, FISH, and RNA-based analyses effectively identified ZFTA- and YAP-fused supratentorial ependymomas. Detection of 1q gain using FISH exhibited only 57% inter-center concordance and low sensitivity and specificity while MIP, MLPA, and DNA methylation-based approaches demonstrated greater accuracy. Conclusions We confirm, in a prospective trial cohort, that H3K27me3 immunohistochemistry is a robust EPN-PFA biomarker. Tenascin-C should be abandoned as a PFA marker. DNA methylation and MIP arrays are effective tools for copy number analysis of 1q gain, 6q, and CDKN2A loss while FISH is inadequate. Fusion detection was successful, but rare novel fusions need more extensive technologies. Finally, we propose test sets to guide future diagnostic approaches.
Links
90249, large research infrastructures |
|