Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
The Relative Age Effect at Different Age Periods in Soccer: A Meta-Analysis
BOZDĚCH, Michal, Adrián AGRICOLA and Jiří ZHÁNĚLBasic information
Original name
The Relative Age Effect at Different Age Periods in Soccer: A Meta-Analysis
Authors
BOZDĚCH, Michal (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Adrián AGRICOLA (703 Slovakia) and Jiří ZHÁNĚL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, UNITED STATES, SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2023, 0031-5125
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30306 Sport and fitness sciences
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 1.600 in 2022
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14510/23:00132076
Organization unit
Faculty of Sports Studies
UT WoS
001090815800001
Keywords in English
annual grouping; football; adolescence; youth development in sport; age disparity impact; performance-driven athlete selection
Tags
Změněno: 4/4/2024 16:11, Mgr. Pavlína Roučová, DiS.
Abstract
V originále
In the selection of young athletes, earlier-born adolescents often leverage their temporary biological advantage over their later-born peers from the same cohort, giving rise to the phenomenon known as the Relative Age Effect (RAE). In this study, we delved into the complexities of the RAE in soccer by reviewing 563 independent research samples across 90 articles. Our analysis showed that age period and performance level are pivotal factors influencing the magnitude of the RAE. The adolescent age period emerged as a significant RAE determinant, showcasing the highest effect size magnitudes in our findings. Among athletes of different performance levels, adult European soccer players have been extensively studied, and they have exhibited the most pronounced RAE magnitudes. Intriguingly, our findings reveal another compelling trend: the frequency of players born early versus late in the eligible birth year escalated as player performance levels increased, particularly during adolescence. Coaches and players appear to capitalize unconsciously on this maturational advantage, though this strategy wanes post-adolescence. While there are currently no penalties for this team selection practice, our findings stress the need for coaches to comprehend the ramifications of selecting athletes with an age bias We offer insights into RAE complexities, highlight the synergy of age and performance in these transitory advantages, and advance arguments for more fairly selecting and developing youth athletes.