Comparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by
atmospheric pressure plasma jets

J 2023

Comparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by atmospheric pressure plasma jets

POLÁŠKOVÁ, Kateřina, Alp OZKAN, Miloš KLÍMA, Zdenka JENÍKOVÁ, Madhuwanthi BUDDHADASA et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Comparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by atmospheric pressure plasma jets

Authors

POLÁŠKOVÁ, Kateřina (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Alp OZKAN, Miloš KLÍMA, Zdenka JENÍKOVÁ, Madhuwanthi BUDDHADASA, Francois RENIERS and Lenka ZAJÍČKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

Plasma processes and polymers, Weinheim, Wiley-VCH, 2023, 1612-8850

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

10305 Fluids and plasma physics

Country of publisher

Germany

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

URL

Impact factor

Impact factor: 3.500 in 2022

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14310/23:00132613

Organization unit

Faculty of Science

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppap.202300031

UT WoS

001026328200001

Keywords in English

adhesion; arc-based jet; low-temperature plasma jet; plasma treatment; poly(propylene) (PP)

Abstract

V originále

Plasma treatment of polypropylene (PP) is a well-established method of improving its surface properties. However, the efficiencies of different plasma discharges are seldom compared. Herein, we discuss the differences in PP treated by three arc-based commercial plasma jets working in dry air, Plasmatreat rotating plasma jet (PT-RPJ), AFS PlasmaJet & REG; (AFS-PJ), and SurfaceTreat gliding arc jet (ST-GA), and by the low-temperature RF plasma slit jet (RF-PSJ) working in argon. The AFS-PJ has a significantly different reactive species composition dominated by nitrogen oxides. It induced higher thermal loads leading to surface damage. The other arc-based jets (PT-RPJ and ST-GA) created the PP surface with higher oxygen and nitrogen concentration than the low-temperature RF-PSJ. It induced a higher adhesion strength measured on PP-aluminum joints.

Links

90110, large research infrastructures

Name: CzechNanoLab

Citovat

POLÁŠKOVÁ, Kateřina, Alp OZKAN, Miloš KLÍMA, Zdenka JENÍKOVÁ, Madhuwanthi BUDDHADASA, Francois RENIERS and Lenka ZAJÍČKOVÁ. Comparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by atmospheric pressure plasma jets. Plasma processes and polymers. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2023, vol. 20, No 11, p. 1-18. ISSN 1612-8850. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppap.202300031.

@article{2352388,
   author = {Polášková, Kateřina and Ozkan, Alp and Klíma, Miloš and Jeníková, Zdenka and Buddhadasa, Madhuwanthi and Reniers, Francois and Zajíčková, Lenka},
   article_location = {Weinheim},
   article_number = {11},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppap.202300031},
   keywords = {adhesion; arc-based jet; low-temperature plasma jet; plasma treatment; poly(propylene) (PP)},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1612-8850},
   journal = {Plasma processes and polymers},
   title = {Comparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by atmospheric pressure plasma jets},
   url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.202300031},
   volume = {20},
   year = {2023}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2352388
AU  - Polášková, Kateřina - Ozkan, Alp - Klíma, Miloš - Jeníková, Zdenka - Buddhadasa, Madhuwanthi - Reniers, Francois - Zajíčková, Lenka
PY  - 2023
TI  - Comparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by atmospheric pressure plasma jets
JF  - Plasma processes and polymers
VL  - 20
IS  - 11
SP  - 1-18
EP  - 1-18
PB  - Wiley-VCH
SN  - 16128850
KW  - adhesion
KW  - arc-based jet
KW  - low-temperature plasma jet
KW  - plasma treatment
KW  - poly(propylene) (PP)
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.202300031
N2  - Plasma treatment of polypropylene (PP) is a well-established method of improving its surface properties. However, the efficiencies of different plasma discharges are seldom compared. Herein, we discuss the differences in PP treated by three arc-based commercial plasma jets working in dry air, Plasmatreat rotating plasma jet (PT-RPJ), AFS PlasmaJet & REG; (AFS-PJ), and SurfaceTreat gliding arc jet (ST-GA), and by the low-temperature RF plasma slit jet (RF-PSJ) working in argon. The AFS-PJ has a significantly different reactive species composition dominated by nitrogen oxides. It induced higher thermal loads leading to surface damage. The other arc-based jets (PT-RPJ and ST-GA) created the PP surface with higher oxygen and nitrogen concentration than the low-temperature RF-PSJ. It induced a higher adhesion strength measured on PP-aluminum joints.
ER  -

POLÁŠKOVÁ, Kateřina, Alp OZKAN, Miloš KLÍMA, Zdenka JENÍKOVÁ, Madhuwanthi BUDDHADASA, Francois RENIERS and Lenka ZAJÍČKOVÁ. Comparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by atmospheric pressure plasma jets. \textit{Plasma processes and polymers}. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2023, vol.~20, No~11, p.~1-18. ISSN~1612-8850. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppap.202300031.

Detailed Information on Publication Record