NACHTNEBL, Luboš, Vasileios APOSTOLOPOULOS, Michal MAHDAL, Lukáš PAZOUREK, Pavel BRANČÍK, Tomáš VALOUŠEK, Petr BOHAC and Tomáš TOMÁŠ. Implant Preference and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: All-Polyethylene and Contralateral Metal-Backed Tibial Components. Journal of Clinical Medicine. Basel: MDPI, 2023, vol. 12, No 23, p. 1-9. ISSN 2077-0383. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237438.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Implant Preference and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: All-Polyethylene and Contralateral Metal-Backed Tibial Components
Authors NACHTNEBL, Luboš (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Vasileios APOSTOLOPOULOS (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Michal MAHDAL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Lukáš PAZOUREK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Pavel BRANČÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Tomáš VALOUŠEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petr BOHAC (203 Czech Republic) and Tomáš TOMÁŠ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Journal of Clinical Medicine, Basel, MDPI, 2023, 2077-0383.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30211 Orthopaedics
Country of publisher Switzerland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 3.900 in 2022
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/23:00132679
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237438
UT WoS 001117938900001
Keywords in English bilateral knee replacement; total knee arthroplasty; all-polyethylene tibia; metal-backed tibia; staged bilateral knee arthroplasty
Tags 14110123, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Changed: 31/1/2024 10:56.
Abstract
Numerous studies have compared metal-backed components (MBTs) and all-polyethylene tibial components (APTs), but none of them specifically analysed the clinical results and the overall patient preference in patients who had undergone a staged bilateral knee replacement. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical results, perceived range of motion, and overall implant preference among patients who had undergone staged bilateral knee replacement with an APT and contralateral knee replacement with MBTs. A dataset of 62 patients from a single centre who underwent staged bilateral TKA between 2009 and 2022 was selected and retrospectively analysed. Tibial component removal was performed in three knees overall, all of which had MBTs. The mean measured Knee Score (KS) of knees with APTs was 78.37 and that of contralateral knees with MBTs was 77.4. The mean measured Function (FS) of knees with APTs was 78.22, and that of contralateral knees with MBs was 76.29. The mean flexion angle of knees with APTs was 103.8 and that for knees with MBTs was 101.04 degrees. A total of 54.8% of the patients preferred the knee that received APTs over contralateral MBTs. In our cohort, TKA with an APT in one knee and an MBT in the contralateral knee recorded similar clinical results and perceived ranges of motion. Patients in general preferred the knee that received an APT over contralateral knee with an MBT.
PrintDisplayed: 23/8/2024 12:53