Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
The Influence of Slice Thickness, Sharpness, and Contrast Adjustments on Inferior Alveolar Canal Segmentation on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans: A Retrospective Study
ISSA, Julien, Abanoub RIAD, Raphael OLSZEWSKI and Marta DYSZKIEWICZ-KONWINSKABasic information
Original name
The Influence of Slice Thickness, Sharpness, and Contrast Adjustments on Inferior Alveolar Canal Segmentation on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans: A Retrospective Study
Authors
ISSA, Julien, Abanoub RIAD (818 Egypt, belonging to the institution), Raphael OLSZEWSKI and Marta DYSZKIEWICZ-KONWINSKA
Edition
Journal of Personalized Medicine, Basel, MDPI, 2023, 2075-4426
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30304 Public and environmental health
Country of publisher
Switzerland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.508 in 2021
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00132987
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
001095495300001
Keywords in English
diagnostic imaging; X-rays; cone-beam computed tomography; mandibular canal; tomography
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 12/1/2024 14:28, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
This retrospective study aims to investigate the impact of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) viewing parameters such as contrast, slice thickness, and sharpness on the identification of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAC). A total of 25 CBCT scans, resulting in 50 IACs, were assessed by two investigators using a three-score system (good, average, and poor) on cross-sectional images. Slice thicknesses of 0.25 mm, 0.5 mm, and 1 mm were tested, along with varying sharpness (0, 6, 8, and 10) and contrast (0, 400, 800, and 1200) settings. The results were statistically analyzed to determine the optimal slice thickness for improved visibility of IAC, followed by evaluating the influence of sharpness and contrast using the optimal thickness. The identified parameters were then validated by performing semi-automated segmentation of the IACs and structure overlapping to evaluate the mean distance. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were assessed using Kappa statistics, and inferential statistics used Pearson's Chi-square test. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for all parameters were significant, ranging from 69% to 83%. A slice thickness of 0.25 mm showed consistently "good" visibility (80%). Sharpness values of zero and contrast values of 1200 also demonstrated high frequencies of "good" visibility. Overlap analysis resulted in an average mean distance of 0.295 mm and a standard deviation of 0.307 mm across all patients' sides. The study revealed that a slice thickness of 0.25 mm, zero sharpness value, and higher contrast value of 1200 improved the visibility and accuracy of IAC segmentation in CBCT scans. The individual patient's characteristics, such as anatomical variations, decreased bone density, and absence of canal walls cortication, should be considered when using these parameters.