J 2023

Conflicts of Interest in the Assessment of Chemicals, Waste, and Pollution

SCHAEFFER, Andreas, Ksenia J. GROH, Gabriel SIGMUND, David AZOULAY, Thomas BACKHAUS et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Conflicts of Interest in the Assessment of Chemicals, Waste, and Pollution

Authors

SCHAEFFER, Andreas, Ksenia J. GROH, Gabriel SIGMUND, David AZOULAY, Thomas BACKHAUS, Michael G. BERTRAM, Bethanie Carney ALMROTH, Ian T. COUSINS, Alex T. FORD, Joan O. GRIMALT, Yago GUIDA, Maria C. HANSSON, Yunsun JEONG, Rainer LOHMANN (276 Germany), David MICHAELS, Leonie MUELLER, Jane MUNCKE, Gunilla OBERG, Marcos A. ORELLANA, Edmond SANGANYADO, Ralf Bernhard SCHAEFER, Ishmail SHERIFF, Ryan C. SULLIVAN, Noriyuki SUZUKI, Laura N. VANDENBERG, Marta VENIER, Penny VLAHOS, Martin WAGNER, Fang WANG, Mengjiao WANG, Anna SOEHL, Marlene AGERSTRAND, Miriam L. DIAMOND and Martin SCHERINGER (756 Switzerland, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, WASHINGTON, AMER CHEMICAL SOC, 2023, 0013-936X

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

10511 Environmental sciences

Country of publisher

United States of America

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Impact factor

Impact factor: 11.400 in 2022

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14310/23:00133180

Organization unit

Faculty of Science

UT WoS

001116612700001

Keywords in English

human health; ecosystem health; science-policypanel; conflict of interest

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 23/1/2024 19:45, Mgr. Michaela Hylsová, Ph.D.

Abstract

V originále

Pollution by chemicals and waste impacts human and ecosystem health on regional, national, and global scales, resulting, together with climate change and biodiversity loss, in a triple planetary crisis. Consequently, in 2022, countries agreed to establish an intergovernmental science-policy panel (SPP) on chemicals, waste, and pollution prevention, complementary to the existing intergovernmental science-policy bodies on climate change and biodiversity. To ensure the SPP's success, it is imperative to protect it from conflicts of interest (COI). Here, we (i) define and review the implications of COI, and its relevance for the management of chemicals, waste, and pollution; (ii) summarize established tactics to manufacture doubt in favor of vested interests, i.e., to counter scientific evidence and/or to promote misleading narratives favorable to financial interests; and (iii) illustrate these with selected examples. This analysis leads to a review of arguments for and against chemical industry representation in the SPP's work. We further (iv) rebut an assertion voiced by some that the chemical industry should be directly involved in the panel's work because it possesses data on chemicals essential for the panel's activities. Finally, (v) we present steps that should be taken to prevent the detrimental impacts of COI in the work of the SPP. In particular, we propose to include an independent auditor's role in the SPP to ensure that participation and processes follow clear COI rules. Among others, the auditor should evaluate the content of the assessments produced to ensure unbiased representation of information that underpins the SPP's activities.