Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Comparison of problem-based and team-based learning strategies: a multi-institutional investigation
KORIŤÁKOVÁ, Eva, Trupti JIVRAM, Georgiana-Emmanuela GILCA-BLANARIU, Vendula CHUROVÁ, Ella POULTON et. al.Basic information
Original name
Comparison of problem-based and team-based learning strategies: a multi-institutional investigation
Authors
KORIŤÁKOVÁ, Eva (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Trupti JIVRAM, Georgiana-Emmanuela GILCA-BLANARIU, Vendula CHUROVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Ella POULTON, Adrian Ioan CIUREANU, Chandran LOUIS, Gabriela STEFANESCU and Daniel SCHWARZ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Frontiers in Education, Lausanne, Frontiers Media, 2023, 2504-284X
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50301 Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Country of publisher
Switzerland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.300 in 2022
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00133338
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
001136520100001
Keywords in English
collaborative learning activities; problem-based learning; team-based learning; virtual scenario; attitude surveys
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 31/1/2024 09:57, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
ObjectivesOver time, pedagogical practices in higher education have evolved significantly, which has led to the development of collaborative learning strategies. The study aims to compare the two most prominent ones - problem-based learning (PBL) and team-based learning (TBL). The comparison, integrated with Virtual Scenarios (VSs), involves student cohorts from various European institutions, specifically focusing on both PBL and TBL methods. The study is distinctive in its use of a consistent PBL/TBL methodology, ensured via joint staff training, and explores the perspectives of students and educators on these learning techniques. The overarching aim is to examine how PBL and TBL, coupled with VSs, influence problem-solving skills, independent learning, and student engagement.MethodsThe examination was made using feedback from 399 students and 11 tutors collected in four trials held in three institutions based in Czechia, the United Kingdom and Romania. The data gathered from surveys and a focus group discussion contained qualitative as well as quantitative data, such as Likert scale questions. To analyse the overall trends in learners' satisfaction with PBL and TBL sessions, the mean score calculated from the transformed Likert scale questions was compared between sessions and among institutions using multivariate ANOVA.ResultsThe students' satisfaction and learning experience are heavily influenced by specific conditions, primarily their prior experience, room and technical set-up, group composition and especially the personality of a tutor. Overall, both strategies were found to be well-received by students used to traditional teaching methods. Students accustomed to PBL did not find TBL more engaging or useful. The identified advantages of TBL over PBL were the presence of a content expert, readiness tests, acquiring the same knowledge ensured through the collective presence of all students in one session and unified pre-class materials. However, TBL is more demanding on room set-up and teaching staff coordination.ConclusionBoth strategies have been found to have pros and cons and neither showed clear superiority over the other one. An institution newly implementing PBL or TBL needs to focus on different aspects than an institution planning to switch from PBL to TBL.
Links
2018-1-CZ01-KA203-048197, interní kód MU |
|