Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Primary Breast Sarcoma: A Two-Centre Analysis and Review of Literature
ŽATECKÝ, Jan, Oldřich COUFAL, Pavel FABIAN, Miloš HOLÁNEK, Eva SEHNALKOVA et. al.Basic information
Original name
Primary Breast Sarcoma: A Two-Centre Analysis and Review of Literature
Authors
ŽATECKÝ, Jan (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), Oldřich COUFAL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Pavel FABIAN (203 Czech Republic), Miloš HOLÁNEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Eva SEHNALKOVA (203 Czech Republic) and Petr BURKOŇ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
BREAST CARE, BASEL, KARGER, 2023, 1661-3791
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30204 Oncology
Country of publisher
Switzerland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.100 in 2022
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00133363
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
001010246100001
Keywords in English
Primary breast sarcoma; Prognostic factors; Two-centre analysis
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 1/2/2024 08:49, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Introduction: Primary breast sarcoma is a very rare malignant type of breast tumours with an incidence of 0.1% of all primary breast malignancies. Methods: We present a retrospective analysis of the case series from two hospitals in the Czech Republic with a review of the diagnostic and treatment approach to primary breast sarcomas with an analysis of published prognostic factors. Results: Eleven patients were included in the study, 9 women and 2 men. Statistical evaluation revealed that tumour size (p = 0.1964), grade (p = 0.1667), margin distance (p = 0.5403), mitotic activity (p = 0.8577), or age (p = 0.7822) were not prognostic factors in our cohort. Conclusion: The analysis did not prove any of the factors, such as age, tumour size, grade, or mitotic activity, to be statistically significant prognostic factors. Based on the literature review, the most common published prognostic factors are tumour size, margin status, and grade, but the results are ambiguous.