Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies:
introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI
systematic reviews

J 2023

Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews

MUNN, Zachary, Jennifer C STONE, Edoardo AROMATARIS, Miloslav KLUGAR, Kim SEARS et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews

Authors

MUNN, Zachary (guarantor), Jennifer C STONE, Edoardo AROMATARIS, Miloslav KLUGAR (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Kim SEARS, Jo LEONARDI-BEE and Timothy Hugh BARKER

Edition

JBI Evidence Synthesis, PHILADELPHIA, Wolters Kluwer Health, 2023, 2689-8381

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30230 Other clinical medicine subjects

Country of publisher

United States of America

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

URL

Impact factor

Impact factor: 2.700 in 2022

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/23:00133379

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00224

UT WoS

000945987900002

Keywords in English

critical appraisal; methodological quality; risk of bias; systematic reviews

Abstract

V originále

A key step in the systematic review process is the assessment of the methodological quality (or risk of bias) of the included studies. At JBI, we have developed several tools to assist with this evaluation. As evidence synthesis methods continue to evolve, it has been necessary to revise and reflect on JBI's current approach to critical appraisal and to plan a strategy for the future. In this first paper of a series focusing on risk of bias assessment, we introduce our vision for risk of bias assessment for JBI. In future papers in this series, the methodological approach taken for this revision process will be discussed, along with the revised tools and guidance for using these tools.

Links

LTC20031, research and development project

Name: Towards an International Network for Evidence-based Research in Clinical Health Research in the Czech Republic

Investor: Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the CR, INTER-COST

Citovat

MUNN, Zachary, Jennifer C STONE, Edoardo AROMATARIS, Miloslav KLUGAR, Kim SEARS, Jo LEONARDI-BEE and Timothy Hugh BARKER. Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. PHILADELPHIA: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2023, vol. 21, No 3, p. 467-471. ISSN 2689-8381. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00224.

@article{2368619,
   author = {Munn, Zachary and Stone, Jennifer C and Aromataris, Edoardo and Klugar, Miloslav and Sears, Kim and LeonardiandBee, Jo and Barker, Timothy Hugh},
   article_location = {PHILADELPHIA},
   article_number = {3},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00224},
   keywords = {critical appraisal; methodological quality; risk of bias; systematic reviews},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {2689-8381},
   journal = {JBI Evidence Synthesis},
   title = {Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews},
   url = {https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/assessing_the_risk_of_bias_of_quantitative.2.aspx},
   volume = {21},
   year = {2023}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2368619
AU  - Munn, Zachary - Stone, Jennifer C - Aromataris, Edoardo - Klugar, Miloslav - Sears, Kim - Leonardi-Bee, Jo - Barker, Timothy Hugh
PY  - 2023
TI  - Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews
JF  - JBI Evidence Synthesis
VL  - 21
IS  - 3
SP  - 467-471
EP  - 467-471
PB  - Wolters Kluwer Health
SN  - 26898381
KW  - critical appraisal
KW  - methodological quality
KW  - risk of bias
KW  - systematic reviews
UR  - https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/assessing_the_risk_of_bias_of_quantitative.2.aspx
N2  - A key step in the systematic review process is the assessment of the methodological quality (or risk of bias) of the included studies. At JBI, we have developed several tools to assist with this evaluation. As evidence synthesis methods continue to evolve, it has been necessary to revise and reflect on JBI's current approach to critical appraisal and to plan a strategy for the future. In this first paper of a series focusing on risk of bias assessment, we introduce our vision for risk of bias assessment for JBI. In future papers in this series, the methodological approach taken for this revision process will be discussed, along with the revised tools and guidance for using these tools.
ER  -

MUNN, Zachary, Jennifer C STONE, Edoardo AROMATARIS, Miloslav KLUGAR, Kim SEARS, Jo LEONARDI-BEE and Timothy Hugh BARKER. Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews. \textit{JBI Evidence Synthesis}. PHILADELPHIA: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2023, vol.~21, No~3, p.~467-471. ISSN~2689-8381. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00224.

Detailed Information on Publication Record