| MUNN, Zachary, Jennifer C STONE, Edoardo AROMATARIS, Miloslav KLUGAR, Kim SEARS, Jo LEONARDI-BEE and Timothy Hugh BARKER. Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. PHILADELPHIA: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2023, vol. 21, No 3, p. 467-471. ISSN 2689-8381. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00224. |
Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{2368619,
author = {Munn, Zachary and Stone, Jennifer C and Aromataris, Edoardo and Klugar, Miloslav and Sears, Kim and LeonardiandBee, Jo and Barker, Timothy Hugh},
article_location = {PHILADELPHIA},
article_number = {3},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00224},
keywords = {critical appraisal; methodological quality; risk of bias; systematic reviews},
language = {eng},
issn = {2689-8381},
journal = {JBI Evidence Synthesis},
title = {Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews},
url = {https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/assessing_the_risk_of_bias_of_quantitative.2.aspx},
volume = {21},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 2368619
AU - Munn, Zachary - Stone, Jennifer C - Aromataris, Edoardo - Klugar, Miloslav - Sears, Kim - Leonardi-Bee, Jo - Barker, Timothy Hugh
PY - 2023
TI - Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews
JF - JBI Evidence Synthesis
VL - 21
IS - 3
SP - 467-471
EP - 467-471
PB - Wolters Kluwer Health
SN - 26898381
KW - critical appraisal
KW - methodological quality
KW - risk of bias
KW - systematic reviews
UR - https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/assessing_the_risk_of_bias_of_quantitative.2.aspx
N2 - A key step in the systematic review process is the assessment of the methodological quality (or risk of bias) of the included studies. At JBI, we have developed several tools to assist with this evaluation. As evidence synthesis methods continue to evolve, it has been necessary to revise and reflect on JBI's current approach to critical appraisal and to plan a strategy for the future. In this first paper of a series focusing on risk of bias assessment, we introduce our vision for risk of bias assessment for JBI. In future papers in this series, the methodological approach taken for this revision process will be discussed, along with the revised tools and guidance for using these tools.
ER -
MUNN, Zachary, Jennifer C STONE, Edoardo AROMATARIS, Miloslav KLUGAR, Kim SEARS, Jo LEONARDI-BEE and Timothy Hugh BARKER. Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews. \textit{JBI Evidence Synthesis}. PHILADELPHIA: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2023, vol.~21, No~3, p.~467-471. ISSN~2689-8381. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00224.
|
