BARKER, Timothy Hugh, Jennifer C STONE, Kim SEARS, Miloslav KLUGAR, Jo LEONARDI-BEE, Catalin TUFANARU, Edoardo AROMATARIS a Zachary MUNN. Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process. JBI Evidence Synthesis. PHILADELPHIA: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2023, roč. 21, č. 3, s. 478-493. ISSN 2689-8381. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00125. |
Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{2368717, author = {Barker, Timothy Hugh and Stone, Jennifer C and Sears, Kim and Klugar, Miloslav and LeonardiandBee, Jo and Tufanaru, Catalin and Aromataris, Edoardo and Munn, Zachary}, article_location = {PHILADELPHIA}, article_number = {3}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00125}, keywords = {critical appraisal instruments; methodological quality; risk of bias; systematic review methodology}, language = {eng}, issn = {2689-8381}, journal = {JBI Evidence Synthesis}, title = {Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process}, url = {https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/revising_the_jbi_quantitative_critical_appraisal.4.aspx}, volume = {21}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR ID - 2368717 AU - Barker, Timothy Hugh - Stone, Jennifer C - Sears, Kim - Klugar, Miloslav - Leonardi-Bee, Jo - Tufanaru, Catalin - Aromataris, Edoardo - Munn, Zachary PY - 2023 TI - Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process JF - JBI Evidence Synthesis VL - 21 IS - 3 SP - 478-493 EP - 478-493 PB - Wolters Kluwer Health SN - 26898381 KW - critical appraisal instruments KW - methodological quality KW - risk of bias KW - systematic review methodology UR - https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/revising_the_jbi_quantitative_critical_appraisal.4.aspx N2 - JBI offers a suite of critical appraisal instruments that are freely available to systematic reviewers and researchers investigating the methodological limitations of primary research studies. The JBI instruments are designed to be study-specific and are presented as questions in a checklist. The JBI instruments have existed in a checklist-style format for approximately 20 years; however, as the field of research synthesis expands, many of the tools offered by JBI have become outdated. The JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative studies (eg, randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies) must be updated to reflect the current methodologies in this field. Cognizant of this and the recent developments in risk-of-bias science, the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group was tasked with updating the current quantitative critical appraisal instruments. This paper details the methods and rationale that the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group followed when updating the JBI critical appraisal instruments for quantitative study designs. We detail the key changes made to the tools and highlight how these changes reflect current methodological developments in this field. ER -
BARKER, Timothy Hugh, Jennifer C STONE, Kim SEARS, Miloslav KLUGAR, Jo LEONARDI-BEE, Catalin TUFANARU, Edoardo AROMATARIS a Zachary MUNN. Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process. \textit{JBI Evidence Synthesis}. PHILADELPHIA: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2023, roč.~21, č.~3, s.~478-493. ISSN~2689-8381. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00125.
|