| BARKER, Timothy Hugh, Jennifer C STONE, Kim SEARS, Miloslav KLUGAR, Jo LEONARDI-BEE, Catalin TUFANARU, Edoardo AROMATARIS and Zachary MUNN. Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process. JBI Evidence Synthesis. PHILADELPHIA: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2023, vol. 21, No 3, p. 478-493. ISSN 2689-8381. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00125. |
Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{2368717,
author = {Barker, Timothy Hugh and Stone, Jennifer C and Sears, Kim and Klugar, Miloslav and LeonardiandBee, Jo and Tufanaru, Catalin and Aromataris, Edoardo and Munn, Zachary},
article_location = {PHILADELPHIA},
article_number = {3},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00125},
keywords = {critical appraisal instruments; methodological quality; risk of bias; systematic review methodology},
language = {eng},
issn = {2689-8381},
journal = {JBI Evidence Synthesis},
title = {Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process},
url = {https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/revising_the_jbi_quantitative_critical_appraisal.4.aspx},
volume = {21},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 2368717
AU - Barker, Timothy Hugh - Stone, Jennifer C - Sears, Kim - Klugar, Miloslav - Leonardi-Bee, Jo - Tufanaru, Catalin - Aromataris, Edoardo - Munn, Zachary
PY - 2023
TI - Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process
JF - JBI Evidence Synthesis
VL - 21
IS - 3
SP - 478-493
EP - 478-493
PB - Wolters Kluwer Health
SN - 26898381
KW - critical appraisal instruments
KW - methodological quality
KW - risk of bias
KW - systematic review methodology
UR - https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/revising_the_jbi_quantitative_critical_appraisal.4.aspx
N2 - JBI offers a suite of critical appraisal instruments that are freely available to systematic reviewers and researchers investigating the methodological limitations of primary research studies. The JBI instruments are designed to be study-specific and are presented as questions in a checklist. The JBI instruments have existed in a checklist-style format for approximately 20 years; however, as the field of research synthesis expands, many of the tools offered by JBI have become outdated. The JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative studies (eg, randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies) must be updated to reflect the current methodologies in this field. Cognizant of this and the recent developments in risk-of-bias science, the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group was tasked with updating the current quantitative critical appraisal instruments. This paper details the methods and rationale that the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group followed when updating the JBI critical appraisal instruments for quantitative study designs. We detail the key changes made to the tools and highlight how these changes reflect current methodological developments in this field.
ER -
BARKER, Timothy Hugh, Jennifer C STONE, Kim SEARS, Miloslav KLUGAR, Jo LEONARDI-BEE, Catalin TUFANARU, Edoardo AROMATARIS and Zachary MUNN. Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process. \textit{JBI Evidence Synthesis}. PHILADELPHIA: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2023, vol.~21, No~3, p.~478-493. ISSN~2689-8381. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00125.
|
