Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Randomized comparison of 9-month stent strut coverage of biolimus and everolimus drug-eluting stents assessed by optical coherence tomography in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Long-term (5-years) clinical follow-up (ROBUST trial)
JAKL, Martin, Pavel CERVINKA, Jan KAŇOVSKÝ, Petr KALA, Martin POLOCZEK et. al.Basic information
Original name
Randomized comparison of 9-month stent strut coverage of biolimus and everolimus drug-eluting stents assessed by optical coherence tomography in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Long-term (5-years) clinical follow-up (ROBUST trial)
Authors
JAKL, Martin (203 Czech Republic), Pavel CERVINKA (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), Jan KAŇOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petr KALA (203 Czech Republic), Martin POLOCZEK (203 Czech Republic), Michaela CERVINKOVA (203 Czech Republic), Hiram G BEZERRA, Zdenek VALENTA (203 Czech Republic) and Marco Aurelio COSTA
Edition
CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, GDANSK, VIA MEDICA, 2023, 1897-5593
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Country of publisher
Poland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.900 in 2022
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00133406
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
001116942600001
Keywords in English
drug-eluting stent; primary percutaneous coronary intervention; stent strut coverage; optical coherence tomography; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; clinical trials
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 2/2/2024 09:51, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Background: The aim of the study was to compare healing (assessed by optical coherence tomography [OCT]) of biolimus A9 (BES) and everolimus drug-eluting stents (EES) at 9-month follow-up in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Nine-month clinical and angiographic data were also compared in both groups as well as clinical data at 5 years of follow-up.Methods: A total of 201 patients with STEMI were enrolled in the study and randomized either to pPCI with BES or EES implantation. All patients were scheduled for 9 months of angiographic and OCT follow-up.Results: The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was comparable at 9 months in both groups (5% in BES vs. 6% in the EES group; p = 0.87). Angiographic data were also comparable between both groups. The main finding at 9-month OCT analysis was the greatly reduced extent of mean neointimal area at the cost of a higher proportion of uncovered struts in the BES group (1.3 mm2 vs. 0.9 mm2; p = 0.0001 and 15.9% vs. 7.0%; p = 0.0001, respectively). At 5 years of clinical follow-up the rate of MACE was comparable between both groups (16.8% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.74).Conclusions: The study demonstrates a very low rate of MACE and good 9-month stent strut coverage of second-generation BES and EES in patients with STEMI. BES showed greatly reduced extent of mean neointimal hyperplasia area at the cost of a higher proportion of uncovered struts when compared to EES. The rate of MACE was low and comparable in both groups at 5 years. (Cardiol J 2023; 30, 6: 921-928)