Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{2377062,
author = {Pivoda, Marek},
article_location = {United Kingdom},
article_number = {First View},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cel.2023.15},
keywords = {constitutional courts; ECJ; preliminary references; Article 267 TFEU; deliberative democracy; market capitalism; legitimacy},
language = {eng},
issn = {1528-8870},
journal = {Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies},
title = {Constitutional Courts Asking Questions: A Deliberative Potential of Preliminary Reference Mechanism},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-yearbook-of-european-legal-studies/article/constitutional-courts-asking-questions-a-deliberative-potential-of-preliminary-reference-mechanism/F2DF8A4B46C0ACC5B4F82CDAA54B518A},
volume = {2023},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 2377062
AU - Pivoda, Marek
PY - 2023
TI - Constitutional Courts Asking Questions: A Deliberative Potential of Preliminary Reference Mechanism
JF - Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies
VL - 2023
IS - First View
SP - 1-20
EP - 1-20
PB - Cambridge University Press
SN - 15288870
KW - constitutional courts
KW - ECJ
KW - preliminary references
KW - Article 267 TFEU
KW - deliberative democracy
KW - market capitalism
KW - legitimacy
UR - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-yearbook-of-european-legal-studies/article/constitutional-courts-asking-questions-a-deliberative-potential-of-preliminary-reference-mechanism/F2DF8A4B46C0ACC5B4F82CDAA54B518A
N2 - This Article interrogates the role of national constitutional courts within the Article 267 TFEU preliminary reference mechanism from both descriptive and normative angles. First, I demonstrate that although a clear majority of the constitutional courts submit references to the ECJ on a more frequent basis, differences in individual approaches remain significant. Subsequently, I argue that the core normative attractivity of the questions submitted in the course of domestic constitutional review lies in their participative and deliberative potential. Compared to ordinary courts, constitutional courts are better suited to amplify the ‘unheard’ voices of immobile EU citizens. By counterbalancing the demands of the EU's functional constitution, which is primarily based on the ideals of market capitalism, constitutional courts’ questions may contribute to the EU's capacity to generate legitimate decisions. Finally, I put my theoretical claims in context and analyse the main ways in which such deliberative potential can translate into practice.
ER -
PIVODA, Marek. Constitutional Courts Asking Questions: A Deliberative Potential of Preliminary Reference Mechanism. \textit{Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies}. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2023, vol.~2023, First View, p.~1-20. ISSN~1528-8870. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cel.2023.15.
|
