Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Late Window Imaging Selection for Endovascular Therapy of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: An International Survey
NGUYEN, Thanh N, Piers KLEIN, Anne BERBERICH, Simon NAGEL, Mohamad ABDALKADER et. al.Basic information
Original name
Late Window Imaging Selection for Endovascular Therapy of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: An International Survey
Authors
NGUYEN, Thanh N, Piers KLEIN, Anne BERBERICH, Simon NAGEL, Mohamad ABDALKADER, Ana HERNING, Yimin CHEN, Xiaochuan HUO, Zhongrong MIAO, Sunil A SHETH, Muhammad M QURESHI, James E SIEGLER, Simona SACCO, Daniel STRBIAN, Urs FISCHER, Hiroshi YAMAGAMI, Espen Saxhaug KRISTOFFERSEN, Volker PUETZ, Wouter SCHONEWILLE, Georgios TSIVGOULIS, Brian DRUMM, Soma BANERJEE, Jelle DEMEESTERE, Fana ALEMSEGED, Else C SANDSET, Anita Ante ARSOVSKA, Kailash KRISHNAN, Permesh S DHILLON, Angel CORREDOR, Rodrigo RIVERA, Petra ŠEDOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Robert MIKULÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Hesham E MASOUD, Sheila O MARTINS, Thang Huy NGUYEN, Mai Duy TON, Xinfeng LIU, Yuyou ZHU, Fengli LI, Wan Asyraf Wan ZAIDI, Marialuisa ZEDDE, Shadi YAGHI, Jian MIAO, Violiza INOA, Liqun ZHANG, Rytis MASILIUNAS, Peter SLADE, Sarah Shali MATUJA, Joao Pedro MARTO, Patrik MICHEL, Jens FIEHLER, Gotz THOMALLA, Alicia C CASTONGUAY, Maxim MOKIN, Mark PARSONS, Bruce C V CAMPBELL, Dileep R YAVAGAL, Diederik DIPPEL, Mayank GOYAL, Osama O ZAIDAT, Tudor G JOVIN, Wei HU, Raul G NOGUEIRA, Zhongming QIU, Jean RAYMOND and Gustavo SAPOSNIK
Edition
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology, United Hoboken, Wiley, 2023, 2694-5746
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30210 Clinical neurology
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00133694
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
001157345000021
Keywords in English
endovascular therapy; large vessel occlusion; late window; mechanical thrombectomy
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 29/2/2024 10:29, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Background Current stroke guidelines recommend advanced imaging (computed tomography [CT] perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging) prior to endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with late presentation of large vessel occlusion. Adherence to guidelines may be constrained by resources or timely access to imaging. We sought to understand the factors which influence late window imaging selection for EVT candidates with large vessel occlusion. Methods We conducted an international survey from January to May 2022. The questions aimed to identify advanced imaging and treatment decisions based on access to imaging, time delays, and simulated patient scenarios. Results There were 3000 invited participants and 1506 respondents, the majority (89.6%) from comprehensive stroke centers in high-income countries. Neurointerventionalists comprised 31.8% and noninterventionalists 68.2% of respondents. Overall, 70.7% reported routine use of advanced imaging for late EVT selection, and 63.6% reported its usage in every case. There was greater availability of advanced imaging in comprehensive stroke centers versus primary stroke centers (67.0% versus 33.7%; P<0.0001), and high- versus low-middle income countries (70.5% versus 44.5%; P<0.0001). When presented with a late window patient, 41.6% would complete CT perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging prior to EVT, 25.4% would perform CT perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging prior to IVT and EVT, and 25.8% would refer to EVT without advanced imaging. If advanced imaging was not readily available, 70.1% would refer a patient to EVT based on CT in the late window. Additional time delay within 20 minutes to obtain advanced imaging was considered acceptable in 77.7% of respondents. Conclusion Current guidelines for imaging late window EVT candidates are inconsistent with imaging decisions by physicians. Most respondents consider an imaging delay of greater than 20 minutes unacceptable. Access to advanced imaging was greater in comprehensive stroke centers and high-income countries. In the case of limited access most respondents would consider EVT based on CT only.