ČELLÁROVÁ, Katarína and Rostislav STANĚK. Contest and resource allocation: An experimental analysis of entitlement and self-selection effects. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY. NEW YORK: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2024, vol. 82, March, p. 1-10. ISSN 0176-2680. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102526.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Contest and resource allocation: An experimental analysis of entitlement and self-selection effects
Authors ČELLÁROVÁ, Katarína and Rostislav STANĚK.
Edition EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, NEW YORK, ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2024, 0176-2680.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Country of publisher Netherlands
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 2.000 in 2022
Organization unit Faculty of Economics and Administration
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102526
UT WoS 001220212100001
Keywords in English Entitlement effect; Self-selection; Contest; Experiment
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Alžběta Karolyiová, učo 217202. Changed: 1/7/2024 13:11.
Abstract
Leaders who decide the allocation of resources are often chosen through contests. Due to imperfect monitoring, they often decide to allocate resources to themselves at the expense of others. This paper investigates how being selected in a contest affects such allocation through two channels: entitlement and self-selection effects. In our experiment, two players compete for the right to allocate resources between themself and a third, uninvolved player. We identify the entitlement effects by comparing the choices of participants who participated in the contest with those who were chosen randomly. Self-selection effect is identified by comparing the choices of winners and losers between treatments via a difference-in-difference approach. We find a significant effect of entitlement; people participating in the contest transfer fewer resources to the third player compared to those who did not participate. Further, we find no evidence that the people with specific distributional preferences self-select into the leaders’ role. Our findings suggest that the primary reason leaders allocate resources to themselves is their involvement in the contest rather than being a result of self-selection.
Links
GA21-25331S, research and development projectName: Konflikty jako nedorozumění: tři experimentální studie
Investor: Czech Science Foundation
PrintDisplayed: 17/8/2024 13:23