Space Science Reviews (2024) 220:24
https://doi.org/! 0.1007/sl 1214-024-01058-1
®Check for
updates
Science with a Small Two-Band UV-Photometry Mission II:
Observations of Stars and Stellar Systems
Jiří Krtička1
• Jan Benáček2 , 3
• Jan Budaj4
• Daniela Korčeková5
• András Pál6
•
Martin Piecka7
• Miloslav Zejda1
• Volkan Bakis8
• Miroslav Brož5
•
Hsiang-Kuang Chang9
• Nikola Faltová1
• Rudolf Gális1 0
• Daniel Jadlovský1
•
Jan Janík1
- Jan Kára5
• Jakub Kolář1
- lva Krtičková1
• Jiří Kubát1 1
•
Brankica Kubátová1 1
• Petr Kurfúrst1
• Matúš Labaj1
• Jaroslav Mere5
•
Zdeněk Mikulášek1
• Filip Múnz1
• Ernst Paunzen1
• Michal Prišegen1 2 , 1
•
Tahereh Ramezani1
•Tatiana Rievajová1
- Jakub Řípa1
• Linda Schmidtobreick1 3
•
Marek Skarka1 , 1 1
• Gabriel Szász1
• Werner Weiss7
• Michal Zajaček1
• Norbert Werner1
Received: 26 June 2023 / Accepted: 23 February 2024 / Published online: 13 March 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
Abstract
We outline the impact of a small two-band UV-photometry satellite mission on the field
of stellar physics, magnetospheres of stars, binaries, stellar clusters, interstellar matter, and
exoplanets. On specific examples of different types of stars and stellar systems, we discuss
particular requirements for such a satellite mission in terms of specific mission parameters
such as bandpass, precision, cadence, and mission duration. We show that such a mission
may provide crucial data not only for hot stars that emit most of their light in UV, but also
for cool stars, where U V traces their activity. This is important, for instance, for exoplanetary
studies, because the level of stellar activity influences habitability. While the main asset
of the two-band U V mission rests in time-domain astronomy, an example of open clusters
proves that such a mission would be important also for the study of stellar populations. Properties
of the interstellar dust are best explored when combining optical and IR information
with observations in UV.
It is well known that dust absorbs U V radiation efficiently. Consequently, we outline how
such a U V mission can be used to detect eclipses of sufficiently hot stars by various dusty
objects and study disks, rings, clouds, disintegrating exoplanets or exoasteroids. Furthermore,
U V radiation can be used to study the cooling of neutron stars providing information
about the extreme states of matter in the interiors of neutron stars and used for mapping
heated spots on their surfaces.
Keywords Techniques: photometric • Ultraviolet: stars • Stars: variables: general • Binaries:
general • Open clusters and associations: general • Planetary systems
1 Introduction
The new discoveries in astrophysics during the last few decades were frequently connected
with the opening of new observational windows into invisible parts of the spectrum. Recently,
the advent of observatories working outside the electromagnetic domain founded a
Extended author information available on the last page of the article
Springer
24 Page 2 of 34 J. Krticka etal.
new branch of science called multimessenger astronomy. From this, it may seem that new
observations in the most classical domain of astronomy, the optical domain, can hardly
revolutionize the field of astrophysics. And yet, small and medium-sized satellite missions
such as CoRoT (Auvergne et al. 2009), Kepler (Borucki et al. 2010), MOST (Walker et al.
2003), BRITE (Weiss et al. 2014), and TESS (Ricker et al. 2015) opened a new window into
time-domain astronomy, extending far beyond the physics of variable stars and exoplanetary
systems.
Similar advances may be expected from photometric missions working in other domains
of the electromagnetic spectrum. In this paper, we outline the impact of a small two-band
ultraviolet (UV) photometric satellite mission on the field of stars, binaries, stellar clusters,
interstellar matter, and exoplanets. The paper is based on Q U V I K - Quick Ultra Violet
Kilonova surveyor (Werner et al. 2024, hereafter Paper I), an approved Czech national
science-technology mission. Q U V I K is a small 130 kg satellite that will be launched to a
low-Earth, Sun-synchronous, dawn-dusk orbit at the end of this decade. Its telescope will
have a moderately large field of view of about 1.0° x 1.0° and two U V bands. The far-UV
band is planned to have a bandwidth of approximately 140-180 nm, and the near-UV band
will span 260-360 nm. The primary objective of Q U V I K is the study of electromagnetic
counterparts of gravitational wave sources, such as kilonovae (Paper I). Besides stellar astrophysics,
the proposed science includes the study of galactic nuclei and nuclear transients
described in Paper III of the series (Zajacek et al. 2023).
QUVIK will provide absolutely calibrated data. This requires calibration on the ground
before the launch and onboard during the flight. The pre-flight ground calibration procedures
include spectral measurements of the throughput of the individual parts of the optical system.
The spectral response and zero point will be determined by observing standard photometric
sources such as individual stars, white dwarfs, and open clusters.
2 Physics of Stars
The most important characteristic that describes the observational appearance of stars is their
effective temperature because it mostly determines the stellar spectral energy distribution.
Therefore, the effective temperature tells us what we can learn from observations of stars in
different spectral domains. According to their effective temperature, stars are conventionally
divided into two large groups: cool stars and hot stars. While hot stars (with effective
temperatures higher than about 7000 K) emit most of their light in UV, and therefore U V
enables us to understand the physics of these stars, cool stars emit only a small part of their
flux in the U V domain, most notably from outer layers of their atmospheres called chromospheres
(Ayres et al. 1981). Consequently, in cool stars, the U V tells us a lot about their
activity and their impact on the surrounding environment.
Although our knowledge of stars has advanced enormously during the last century, many
questions related to the evolution of stars and their impact on the surrounding environment
remain unanswered. This has a strong impact on other fields of astrophysics, including the
physics of binary compact star merger sources of gravitational waves or the study of the
interaction of stars and their exoplanets. Surprisingly, even a small-size U V satellite can
help to solve many of these open questions. In the following, we explain how.
2.1 Tests of Opacities
Opacities are one of the key ingredients of any numerical stellar model. Therefore, any uncertainty
in opacity has a strong influence on the reliability of stellar models. For instance,
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 3 of 34 24
2.5
phase 4> y e a r s
Fig. 1 Variability of chemically peculiar C U Vir. Left: The light curve in ultraviolet (upper panel) and visual
(lower panel - Stromgren vby filters) domains. Empty circles denote HST observations (Krtička et al. 2019).
Middle: The emergent intensity at various rotational phases <j> in the ultraviolet (blue plots) and visual (orange
plots) domains. Right: Rotational period variations with respect to the mean period derived from photometry
(Mikulášek etal. 2011).
inaccurate opacities are one of the suspects of the difference between the sound speed determined
for our Sun from helioseismology and the sound speed derived from solar models
(Basu 2018). Incorrect opacities due to rare-earth elements may cause the mismatch between
the predicted and observed light curves of kilonovae (Wu et al. 2022). The inclusion of iron
peak opacities into models provides a textbook example of the importance of opacities for
triggering pulsations (Iglesias et al. 1992).
Therefore, opacity calculations are of enormous value, and the measurement of opacities
belongs to very important tasks for laboratory astrophysics. However, testing opacities for
actual stellar conditions would be even more valuable. Here comes the hardly replaceable
role of chemically peculiar stars. These hot stars show patches with peculiar abundances of
different elements on their surfaces (Kochukhov and Ryabchikova 2018, see Fig. 1), resulting
from a complex interplay between radiative and gravitational acceleration (e.g., Michaud
et al. 2011). Chemically peculiar stars show rotationally modulated light variability, caused
by horizontal variations of opacity in surface patches, which redistribute flux mostly from
far-UV to near-UV and visual domains (Peterson 1970; Lanz et al. 1996). A comparison of
predicted and observed light curves enables us to test the opacities involved in the modelling
of the outer layers of these stars (Prvák et al. 2015; Krtička et al. 2019, Fig. 1). Cool chemically
peculiar stars are of special interest, because in these stars the opacities of rare-earth
elements are supposed to play a decisive role.
Because most well-studied chemically peculiar stars are relatively bright, it is recommended
that the telescope should enable to observe also stars with magnitude of at least
4 mag or even brighter. The typical rotational period of these stars is on the order of days;
therefore, to sufficiently cover the light curve of these stars, the highest required cadence is
15 min for stars with the shortest rotation period of about half of a day. The study would benefit
from observations in the UV, where the variability is the strongest and where antiphase
behaviour of the light curves (with respect to the optical domain) is expected. From optical
amplitudes of up to 0.1 mag, the required signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of individual photometric
data is about 100. For a reliable comparison with theoretical light curves, detailed
knowledge of the instrumental response function is needed.
Springer
24 Page 4 of 34 J. Krtička etal.
A far-UV band enables to trace opacities due to silicon and iron, which have a maximum
in this region (Prvák et al. 2015). Moreover, this band is ideal for studying hot chemically
peculiar stars, in which the flux variability originates in the far-UV region.
2.2 Probing the Surface Structure in Normal B and A-Type Stars
High-precision satellite photometry of normal main-sequence B and A-type stars revealed
an unexpected phenomenon: a plethora of weak surface spots (Balona 2011, 2017). This
discovery came as a complete surprise as hot stars lack deep subsurface convective zones.
As a result, a revision of the physics of stellar envelopes comprising cool spots has been
suggested (Balona 2017). A more conservative approach advocates a general model of a
surface consisting of overabundant spots, irrespective of the peculiar nature of the stars
(Krtička et al. 2014).
U V photometry can provide an answer about the structure of the stellar surface in normal
B and A-type stars. Signatures of abundance spots in a spectral energy distribution differ
from those of temperature spots. Consequently, precise observation in two bands should
provide data that can be tested against models, including abundance and temperature spots.
This task requires observations with an S N R of 1000 (of individual photometric measurements)
to detect the variability (Balona 2011). Based on available optical light curves, a
higher cadence of observations of 5 min is needed to obtain well-sampled light curves. The
test requires observations in a far-UV and near-UV bands to get simultaneous observations
in two bands. This combination would reliably distinguish between the two models because
the expected amplitude of variability is larger in the far-UV band.
2.3 Understanding the Cyclical Chromospheric Activity and Its Evolutionary
Changes in Cool Stars
Dynamo action powered by convection and differential rotation in envelopes of cool stars
gives rise to variable surface magnetic fields and activity (Chatterjee et al. 2004). A strong
magnetic field suppresses convective energy transport in localized surface regions, leading
to the formation of cool surface spots, which appear dark due to their lower effective
temperature (e.g. Granzer et al. 2000). On top of that, part of the energy flux transported
by subsurface convective motions heats the chromospheres and coronae of cool stars. Except
for variations due to flares, the U V flux shows rotational variations (Hallam and Wolff
1981), variations during the activity cycle as measured in our Sun using the S O R C E satellite
(Harder et al. 2009), and variability in the course of the stellar lifetime (Guinan and Engle
2007).
The evolutionary variability of the U V flux, that is, change of both mean flux and the
properties of short-term variations, can be determined from observations of individual cool
stars with different masses and ages. This can tell us if the U V chromospheric flux varies
with age in a similar way to X-ray activity or rotation (Ribas et al. 2005). Such a study requires
observations below 285 nm, where the chromosphere contribution dominates (Ayres
et al. 1981; Stencel et al. 1986; Johnson and Luttermoser 1987). Therefore, far-UV band
of QUVIK could be used to probe the chromosphere, while the near-UV band would be
contaminated by photospheric flux. Alternatively, simultaneous U V observations in the
220-290 nm band with ULTRASAT (Shvartzvald et al. 2023) would provide a complementary
probe of the chromosphere. The far-UV band is also important for the interaction of cool
stars with their exoplanets (see Sect. 6.2). The expected evolutionary variability is relatively
large, therefore, a medium S N R of about 100 is required.
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 5 of 34 24
Fig. 2 TESS light curve of a
chemically peculiar star HD
37776. Besides the
large-amplitude rotational
variability (due to horizontal
opacity variations), the light _
curve shows regular short-term a
variability dubbed 'warps' by
Mikulášek et al. (2020). " E
<
TESS: HD 37776
-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
phase
Besides the evolutionary variability, cyclical variability of chromospheric emission may
also have an impact on planetary atmospheres on the timescale of several orbits. While the
basic period of solar activity is typically too long to be detected by a single small satellite,
other stars show shorter periods of activity of a few years (Wilson 1978; Baliunas et al.
1995). Such a periodicity can be detected even by a mission with a duration shorter than
the solar cycle. As a result of similar amplitude of flux changes, the requirements of such
observations are basically the same as for the study of evolutionary changes, except for
cadence, which is required of about 14 days due to an expected order-of-year-long period of
this type of variability.
The flaring activity of our Sun became proverbial. However, flares are more typical in
stars much cooler than the Sun, in M dwarfs, where the star may brighten by several orders
of magnitude (Froning et al. 2019). Flares are the aftermaths of a sudden release of magnetic
energy that affects the stellar surface (Haisch et al. 1991). This locally heats the atmospheres
to temperatures of the order of tens of thousand kelvins and leads to a brightening of a star
(Alfred et al. 2006). Due to the high temperature of flaring matter, flares can be best studied
in the ultraviolet domain (Doyle et al. 1989; Welsh et al. 2006). The study of U V light
curves of flaring stars can help to understand the properties of flares (Froning et al. 2019),
their frequency, and their influence on surrounding exoplanets. To fit the light curves of
flares and to determine flare properties (Kowalski and Allred 2018), observations in both
far-UV and near-UV bands are required. Because the flares can appear on a timescale of
seconds and their occurrence cannot be predicted, monitoring of a given star for days with a
cadence of 1 s is needed to determine the flaring activity. A medium SNR of 100 is sufficient
for this purpose.
2.4 Nature of Warps in the Light Curves of Magnetic Stars
High-precision satellite observations of chemically peculiar stars revealed multiple persistent
phase-locked warps on their light curves (Mikulášek et al. 2020, see Fig. 2). The warps
likely originate due to the light absorption in centrifugally supported magnetospheric clouds
reminiscent of stellar prominences (Krtička et al. 2022). The clouds are expected to be fed
by wind, providing the only evidence of winds in low-luminosity hot stars. However, the
competing model predicting the other origin of the warps due to surface features was not yet
excluded. High-precision observations in two bands can resolve the issue. Magnetospheric
absorption originates on free electrons; therefore, it is predicted to be grey. On the other
Springer
24 Page 6 of 34 J. Krticka etal.
hand, variability due to surface features is expected to show different amplitudes in different
bands. Therefore, precise photometric observations in two filters will allow us to understand
the nature of warps in the light curves of chemically peculiar stars and possibly prove the
existence of stellar wind. Observations with a relatively high S N R of 1000 are required to
clearly determine the amplitude of the warps (see Fig. 2). The corresponding cadence of
observations should be about 1 min to observe warps with high time resolution. The nearU
V band combined with optical photometry is suitable to distinguish between the models
of variability. Alternatively, a far-UV band would enable an even better test of the nature
of light absorption in hot stars with corotating magnetospheres (Oksala et al. 2015) and
extremely hot white dwarfs (Reindl et al. 2019).
2.5 Determining the Drivers of Line-Driven Wind Instability
Photometers on board satellite missions detected low-amplitude light variations of single Otype
stars. These variations were attributed to gravity waves (Aerts et al. 2017) or subsurface
convection (Blomme et al. 2011). However, there is an intriguing possibility that this variability
bears the signature of a line-driven wind instability (deshadowing instability, Krticka
and Feldmeier 2018). This would imply that we are able to detect seeds of line-driven wind
instability in photometry. Understanding and detailed modelling of this instability are crucial
for deriving the precise wind mass-loss rate of hot stars from observations (e.g. Sundqvist
et al. 2010; Surlan et al. 2013).
Continuous photometric observation of selected stars in two bands is needed to distinguish
between individual sources of stochastic light variability. Wind blanketing and
changes of temperature affect atmospheres in different ways. Therefore, the amplitudes and
signatures of the variability in two bands provide the key observables in this case (Krticka
and Feldmeier 2018). This requires continuous photometry for several days. A relatively
high S N R of 1000 and cadence of about 30 s is needed to clearly detect the variability. A
reasonable option is to use a near-UV band in combination with a far-UV band, where the
light variability due to wind blanketing is strong (Krticka and Feldmeier 2018).
2.6 Unveiling the Mass-Loss Histories of Be and B[e] Stars
Massive stars are born with masses higher than about 8 M G , but leave a compact remnant
with a typical mass of a few solar masses. When did the mass get lost? We are not sure
(Smith 2014), and that is why we have to explore different evolutionary stages to understand
when mass loss happens. B[e] stars and most notably B[e] supergiants belong to the
evolutionary stage during which a significant amount of mass can be lost. Long-term U V
observations of these stars can distinguish between individual states of the envelope caused
by, e.g., variable disk absorption or LBV-type variations (Hutsemekers 1985; Shore 1990;
Krtickova and Krticka 2018). Furthermore, U V variability provides information on the structure
of the envelope in Be stars (Smith 2001). Observations in two U V bands revealed that
some B[e] stars maintain constant luminosity during their photometric variations, providing
a better understanding of the drivers behind the variability (Krtickova and Krticka 2018).
The study also showed that the U V band is ideal for detecting pulsations, enabling us to
understand the mechanism behind the outbursts in these stars.
A typical timescale of the variability of B[e] star circumstellar environment is of the
order of months; therefore, a cadence of observations of 14 days should be sufficient. The
variability shows relatively large amplitudes, which translates into a loose constraint on SNR
of about 10. The study requires observations in the near-UV band, where the variability due
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 7 of 34 24
to variable effective temperature and dust obscuration is strong. The analysis would benefit
from simultaneous U V observations in the 220-290 nm band with ULTRASAT, whose band
is located close to the carbon opacity bump. The inclusion of a far-UV band would enable
the construction of near reddening-free colour-magnitude diagrams (Krtičková and Krtička
2018), which probe luminosity variations.
Be stars display variability on various time scales. Usually, this variability is described
as long-term (years), medium-term (days to tens of days), and short-term (fraction of a day).
This variability is caused by different mechanisms, such as disk growth and dissipation or
disk waves (Rivinius et al. 2013) and pulsations (e.g., Baade et al. 2016) and is visible in
spectral line profiles and photometry. There exist observational records of visual photometric
observations of Be stars (e.g. Pavlovski et al. 1997, Labadie-Bartz et al. 2017). Simultaneous
observations in visual and far-UV or near-UV bands would significantly help to understand
the Be star variability. The observational effort may include all variability time scales, from
short to long. The required cadence depends on the properties of the objects.
2.7 Mass-Loss Mechanism in Cool Supergiants
After decades of studies, the wind mechanism in cool supergiants is still not very well understood.
Processes invoked to explain cool supergiant outflows include the radiation force on
dust grains, pulsations, and convection. Humphreys and Jones (2022) suggested that most of
the mass-loss in these stars is connected with episodic gaseous outflows similar to that linked
to the Great Dimming of archetypal cool supergiant Betelgeuse (see also Sect. 7). This can
be tested using U V observations. The proposed mechanism for this dimming, which includes
dust cloud (Levesque and Massey 2020; Montargés et al. 2021) and changes in stellar effective
temperature (Dharmawardena et al. 2020), has to cope with the near constant brightness
of the star in the infrared (Gehrz et al. 2020). Variable dust absorption and changing effective
temperature can be distinguished, especially at short wavelengths, due to the different
dependence of amplitudes on wavelength (Jadlovský et al. 2023).
A typical time delay between ejections of individual clumps of the order of years
(Humphreys et al. 2021) is comparable to the duration of a small mission. Therefore, the
frequency of episodic gaseous outflow events in cool supergiants should be estimated from
the observation of a sample of these stars in two U V bands, including the near-UV band and
either far-UV or optical band. Given the long timescale of the variability of these stars, the
1-day cadence should be sufficient with the required SNR ratio of about 100.
2.8 Understanding Pulsating Stars of the Upper Main Sequence
Pulsating stars allow one to probe stellar interiors, which are not accessible to direct observations.
Therefore, the physical conditions and processes within a star can only be observed
through their influence on the pulsation periods and amplitudes. Pulsations provide an elegant
way to derive stars' basic fundamental properties, such as mass, radius, and distance
(De Ridder et al. 2009; Bedding et al. 2011; Belkacem et al. 2011; Miglio et al. 2013).
Several different types of pulsating stars appear in the upper main-sequence region of the
Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. They include ft Cephei stars, which are very massive p-mode
(pressure mode) pulsators (Salmon et al. 2022), S Scuti stars, which are multiperiodic pulsating
variables located in the lower part of the Cepheid instability strip, and rapidly oscillating
Ap stars (Kurtz 1990), which belong to chemically peculiar stars with pulsational variability
in the period range of 5 to 25 minutes. Pulsating stars of the upper main sequence include
also g-mode (gravity mode) pulsators, such as slowly pulsating B-type stars, which pulsate
Springer
24 Page 8 of 34 J. Krticka etal.
in high-order modes (Christophe et al. 2018), and y Doradus stars, which are intermediatemass,
late-A/early-F stars, located at the cool border of the classical S Scuti instability strip,
pulsating in high-order g-modes (Guzik et al. 2000).
If we look at any models describing these classes of variable stars, we find that the amplitudes
typically increase significantly with decreasing wavelength (Guzik and Roth 2021).
The increase is strongly dependent on the rotation (especially of the core), the metallicity,
and mass-loss rate. However, in the U V we have so far only sparse information from groundbased
observations in Johnson U, for example. Time-series in the U V are, therefore, very
much needed to test and calibrate our current pulsational models. This will be an excellent
supplement to the data from the Kepler, PLATO, and TESS missions.
To advance the physics of stellar pulsations, simultaneous (or near-simultaneous within
minutes) observations in two bands are required. Both bands should be preferably located
in U V to obtain a larger amplitude of variability. The benefits of two-color photometry are
illustrated, e.g., by Weiss et al. (2021). Individual pulsating stars show very different periods;
therefore, depending on the variability type, the required cad ency is from 5 minutes up to
days. For the pulsational analysis, a high S N R of about 1000 is needed.
2.9 Neutron Stars
Neutron stars (NS) are strongly magnetised (108
-101 3
G), high-density (106
—101 4
g e m - 3
)
fast-rotating objects with periods from milliseconds to several hundred seconds. They are
unique laboratories to study degenerate matter inside peculiar objects (Lorimer and Kramer
2004). In addition, there are also specific types of NSs that manifest further kinds of accompanying
physical effects - pulsars, accretion-powered NSs, interacting NSs in binaries,
merging NSs, and magnetars (a type of NS with an extremely strong magnetic field). Magnetars
might be related to the recently discovered phenomenon of fast radio bursts (FRBs),
mysterious millisecond transients currently only detected at radio frequencies whose nature
is still unclear (CHIME/FRB Collaboration 2020; Xiao et al. 2021; Petroff et al. 2022), see
Paper I.
There is still a lot of uncertainty about the evolution of NSs, their internal structure and
the structure of their magnetospheres, the sources of their U V emission, locations of these
emission regions, and whether there is, and to what degree, a relation between magnetars
and FRBs. U V observations are crucial to resolve these questions, but are very scarce to date
and could be relatively easily provided by a small satellite.
2.9.1 Revealing the Internal Composition of Neutron Stars by Studying Their Thermal
Evolution
NSs cool down via photon and neutrino emissions at timescales of tens of millions of years.
This evolution provides an important way to reveal NS composition, properties, and equation
of state. If an NS cools only passively, its effective temperature is expected to drop below
104
K in ~ 10 Myr. However, various heating processes slow down (and in some cases even
reverse) the cooling (Gonzalez and Reisenegger 2010). For old NSs, the measured effective
temperatures have been shown to be significantly higher than predicted by cooling models
(Abramkin et al. 2022). There are models of heating processes such as rotochemical heating
and heating due to magnetic field decay. Moreover, NSs were proposed to attract dark matter
because of their high mass. As dark matter reaches the interior of the NS, its interactions
with neutron matter might lead to a measurable heating of the star (Kopp et al. 2023).
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 9 of 34 24
Because the maximum thermal emission of NSs is in the U V range due to their high effective
temperatures, these processes are difficult to be observed from the ground. To properly
estimate the spectral index in the UV, observations should be made in at least two filters.
Additional spectral points necessary to fit black-body radiation can be obtained from observations
at visible and X-ray wavelengths from archives.
A specific objective for the small satellite can be to estimate the effective surface temperature
of five to ten middle-aged to old NSs. By observing in two U V filters, quantitative
estimates of the NS surface temperature can be obtained and compared with the temperature
from NS evolution models. Constraints on the NS effective temperatures would allow refinements
of the evolution models and constrain the internal structure, composition of NSs,
and NS heating process(es). Since old NSs are stable on long timescales, observations are
not time critical and can be obtained at any time during the mission.
We identified seventeen candidate pulsars with expected magnitudes brighter than
22 mag in the U V range (H0g et al. 2000; Hobbs et al. 2004; Mignani 2011; Gaia Collaboration
2020). A l l have been found at least at visual and radio wavelengths simultaneously.
If no U V data were available, we estimated their brightness to be 2 magnitudes fainter than
the V-band magnitude, based on the typical intensity difference of the known pulsars. Also,
this difference is consistent with old NSs that have been simultaneously observed in the
visual and U V range. Some of the candidates are already covered in U V (Abramkin et al.
2022); however, these measurements are not suited to estimate spectral indices, for which
we would need observations made in two U V filters. For a NS magnitude of 22 mag, expected
as a practical limit by QUVIK, we get S N R ~ 23 in ~ 20 hours, which is sufficient
for the proposed estimations of the spectral slope of the black-body radiation.
2.9.2 Mapping the Emission Regions on the Neutron Star Surface
At the surface of the NS, heated regions can be formed, which have been observed in soft
X-rays (Guillot et al. 2019). These are magnetic pole regions where relativistic particles
(the so-called returned current) from the magnetosphere can hit and heat these spots. During
the rotation of the NS, the measured flux changes due to the movement of these heated
regions, allowing it to constrain the impact of individual regions. However, the observed
U V radiation may originate from these regions (hot spots) with a thermal nature or from
other locations in the NS magnetosphere with a non-thermal nature, or a combination of
them. For the magnetospheric origin, the emission mechanisms and locations remain unclear.
More recent models for the non-thermal emission from pulsars include, for example,
the striped-wind model (Petri 2015), the extended-slot-gap and equatorial-current-sheet
model (Barnard et al. 2022), the synchro-curvature model (Iniguez-Pascual et al. 2022), and
the non-stationary outer-gap model (Takata and Cheng 2017). U V observations to disentangle
the thermal and non-thermal components can help to constrain theoretical models.
Moreover, the emission mechanisms and regions of magnetars are very likely different from
those of other classical neutron stars. If the heated surface regions are located where the
magnetic field penetrates the star, monitoring of the emission regions allows refining the
long-standing and highly-discussed issue between a dipolar (classical NS) or multipolar
(magnetars) shape of the magnetosphere, the relation between the different magnetosphere
shapes and their impact on the NS evolution (Yao et al. 2018).
U V photometry can provide an important way to model the thermal spots and shape of
the magnetosphere. To characterise the location of their emission regions, the aim can be to
determine the U V light curves for pulsars (periods < 1 s) and magnetars (periods ~ 10 s)
in the near- and far-UV filters, compare the light curves with those observed in X-rays and
visual range and localise the emission regions based on inverse modelling (Riley et al. 2019).
Springer
24 Page 10 of 34 J. Krticka etal.
The candidate objects have < 16 mag for pulsars and < 18 mag for magnetars in the
U V range. Each measurement should be long enough to obtain SNR ~ 70 for pulsars and
SNR ~ 45 for magnetars. The exposure time can be divided into sub-exposures, each of
them set to ~ 1/15-1 /30 of the NS rotation period (typically 1 ms-1 s). The sub-exposures
have to be aggregated according to the NS rotation phase to obtain the average phase curve.
This short-time observing mode would be unique for the U V observations of a small satellite
and can only be provided by a very few instruments. The observations can be obtained over
the whole mission in more time intervals, given that the precision of the sub-exposure time
stamp is significantly higher than the exposure time itself. Furthermore, as some of the NSs
show sudden changes in their rotation phase (called glitches), their measurements have to be
done in a time interval of a day or a few days. The fast read-out window of the chip has to
be scalable and large enough to include the whole PSF of the stars. Similarly, the exposure
time has to be changeable down to a few milliseconds.
3 Binary Stars
A substantial fraction of stars are found in binary or multiple stellar systems. The binary star
fraction depends on the stars' spectral types (Moe and D i Stefano 2017). Most massive and
luminous stars appear typically in binaries or triple systems; on the other hand, red dwarfs
spend their lives mostly alone. Binary stars are crucial in astrophysical research because they
are unique sources of information. Their orbits provide the most important stellar parameter,
the masses of stars. The most precise and direct determinations of masses are enabled using
visual or eclipsing binaries which are also spectroscopic binaries (Serenelli et al. 2021). The
values of masses at an accuracy better than 1-3% are necessary for tests of models of stellar
evolution (Andersen 1991; Torres et al. 2010). Binary stars provide an extremely large
amount of data about stars, their atmospheres, stellar winds, plasma physics, and the interaction
between stars and their surroundings. They can be used for an independent distance
determination (Southworth et al. 2005; Graczyk et al. 2021).
The world of binaries is very diverse. In detached pairs in relatively wide orbits, the companions
evolve almost independently, allowing us to accurately determine the component
masses, radii, and temperatures. By taking into account their age and chemical compositions,
we can use them to constrain and calibrate models of stellar evolution. Such systems
were used to study the primordial helium abundance, the helium-to-metals enrichment ratio
(Paczynski and Sienkiewicz 1984; Brogaard et al. 2012), the convective core overshooting,
the mixing length parameter (Guinan et al. 2000; Claret and Torres 2018), mass loss by
stellar winds (Ignace et al. 2022), and standard luminosities and multiband bolometric corrections
(Baki§ and Eker 2022). If the stars in a binary system are close enough to fill their
Roche lobes, we speak about semi-detached or contact binary. In such close binaries, mass
exchange between companions or mass loss from the system occurs during their lifetime.
Many different phenomena can then be studied: tidal effects, mass transfer, mass loss, and
orbital angular momentum loss (e.g. Loukaidou et al. 2022). When the mass transfer occurs
during the supergiant evolutionary phase of the more massive component, the star is stripped
off its envelope. Consequently, the evolution may lead to objects such as cataclysmic variables,
X-ray binaries, (super-, hyper-, kilo-)novae, millisecond pulsars, double-degenerate
systems, and generation of short gamma-ray bursts or gravitational waves (Podsiadlowski
et al. 2002; Antoniadis et al. 2013).
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 11 of 34 24
3.1 Galactic and Extragalactic Massive Binaries
The origin and further evolution of massive binaries are still not fully understood. However,
these binaries are of special interest, because the final stage of their evolution results in very
bright transient events caused by super-, hyper-, kilonovae, or mergers generating gravitational
waves. To evaluate and improve the models of stellar evolution, we need to know the
masses and radii of stars. The easiest way to obtain these parameters is to study eclipsing
double-lined spectroscopic binaries. There are more than two million known eclipsing binaries
(Gaia Collaboration et al. 2021). However, only less than 300 have the fundamental
parameters determined with accuracy in 1-3% as requested for the test of stellar models
(see DebCat catalogue in Southworth 2015) and only about one-fourth of the included systems
have massive components (over 3 M©). Thus, new precise measurements in the bands,
where the hot massive stars radiate predominantly, are highly demanding. Observations in
U V and visible bands help to determine the radii of binary components. Two-channel observations
in U V could increase the accuracy of determination of the effective temperature
ratio and allow us to model the reflection effect (Pigulski et al. 2019).
To provide precise binary parameters, accurate observations in two bandpasses with a
time resolution of less than 5 minutes covering the whole phased light curve of selected
systems are required. A combination of near-UV and the optical band could be used, but
near-UV and far-UV provide better constraints for the binary system model.
3.2 (Post-)Common Envelope Binaries
During their lives, a large number of binaries undergo a phase in which both stars share one
common envelope. Such evolutionary phase and resulting post-common-envelope binaries
(PCEBs) are predecessors to many extraordinary objects such as S N la supernovae, X-ray
binaries, double degenerated binaries and others (Paczynski 1976; Wang and Han 2012;
Ivanova et al. 2013).
Nowadays, surveys provide valuable data for searching PCEBs. The number of such systems
containing late-type stars has increased rapidly. However, white dwarfs in PCEBs with
the early-type component are outshined by their companions. The radiation of white dwarfs
only makes up 1% of the total radiation of binary. However, the use of a combination of
far-UV, near-UV, and optical data facilitates the detection of these PCEBs. A convenient
way to detect such systems is to search for main-sequence stars with substantial U V excess
as a result of the presence of a nearby white dwarf companion. This will allow us to determine
the occurrence rate of PCEBs with early-type components and search for this kind of
progenitors of exploding stars or mergers.
This program could be executed as complementary and use observations of binaries that,
by coincidence, appear in field of view (FoV) while monitoring other primary targets.
3.3 Symbiotic Binaries
Symbiotic variables are strongly interacting binary systems consisting of a cool evolved star
(typically M or K giant) and a hot component (white dwarf or neutron star). These objects are
unique astrophysical laboratories in the study of stellar evolution, mass transfer, accretion
processes, stellar winds, jets, dust formation, or thermonuclear outbursts (e.g. Mikolajewska
2012; Munari 2019).
The symbiotic stars are divided into two categories: so-called shell-burning symbiotic
binaries with hydrogen burning ongoing on the surface of the white dwarf and accreting-only
Springer
24 Page 12 of 34 J. Krticka etal.
symbiotic stars powered by accretion. The latter group is less represented in the catalogues
of symbiotic binaries (e.g. Belczyhski et al. 2000; Merc et al. 2019; Akras et al. 2019) as the
optical spectra of these symbiotic stars are often inconspicuous. They can be detected due
to U V excesses, significant flickering (which is most prominent in near-UV), or their X-ray
emission (e.g. Luna et al. 2013; Mukai et al. 2016; Munari et al. 2021; Merc et al. 2023).
U V photometric mission can search for new symbiotic binaries via detection of the U V
excess of the red giant branch and A G B stars. U V photometry can also be used for verification
of the symbiotic candidates by searching for U V excess and/or U V flickering of the
candidates. Such studies require just one U V band and 30-60 minutes time-series of short
exposures of a few tens of seconds to search for flickering. Time series of U V observations
can also help to study the process of accretion in symbiotic stars and in probing the physical
mechanisms of the classical symbiotic outbursts, which is still debated (Munari 2019). In
this case, U V observations of symbiotic stars performed in two bands supplemented with
ground- and space-based optical data can put constraints on the physical mechanisms of the
outbursts. Together with optical and infrared (IR) spectral energy distribution, photometry
in two U V bands can also be used to improve parameters of the hot components of known
symbiotic binaries. Long-term light curves (2-3 years) in one U V band sampled with a cadence
of a few weeks can provide the orbital periods of symbiotic binaries on the basis of
the reflection effect, which has the highest amplitude in near-UV.
3.4 Cataclysmic Variable Stars
Cataclysmic variables (CVs) are close, interacting binary systems comprising a white dwarf
(WD) receiving mass from a Roche lobe-filling late-type star. The actual accretion process
is determined by the absence or strength of the WD's magnetic field. For non-magnetic CVs,
an accretion disc forms around the W D , which helps to remove the angular momentum of
the in-falling material. The gas flows and connected processes in C V s are very complex.
The W D and the accretion disk reach temperatures up to 104
-105
K ; thus, their behaviour
is observable best in UV. In fact, the total luminosity of an accreting C V is dominated by
the luminosity of the accretion disk, which can be derived from the absolute U V magnitudes
(Selvelli and Gilmozzi 2013).
The evolution of a C V is driven by the loss of angular momentum. This process controls
the change of the orbital period and, in the phases of interaction, the mass transfer rate.
For systems above the period gap, magnetic braking dominates the angular momentum loss,
while for systems below the gap, gravitational radiation is the main contributor (for a summary,
see Knigge et al. 2011). The total luminosity gives the momentary accretion rate; for
dwarf novae, differences are observed between quiescent states (no accretion) and outbursts
when the material from the disc is dumped onto the white dwarf. One of the key questions
that can be addressed by a U V photometry mission is how the momentary mass-loss rates
determined from the total luminosity compare to the secular accretion rates as revealed by
W D temperature or secondary bloating. Time-domain U V observations could also help to
probe the variations of the accretion rate with the orbital period. This can provide tests of
theoretical models of angular momentum loss.
Comparison of these accretion rates with standard models shows that there is a possible
increase in the accretion rate in the orbital period range of 3-4 h, i.e., just above the period
gap. This is the domain of S W Sex stars, an evolutionary state that CVs seem to go through
before they enter the period gap (Schmidtobreick 2013). While the S W Sex phenomena can
be explained by assuming high accretion rates, actual values for the accretion rate have only
been estimated for three of these objects (Pala et al. 2017, and references herein). Measuring
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 13 of 34 24
the accretion rate from the U V luminosity and comparing it for SW Sex stars, classical novalike
stars, and dwarf novae will help to understand these extreme objects.
Classical novae are CVs that have been observed to have a nova eruption. Theory predicts
that the W D is heated by the eruption. Subsequently, it can irradiate the secondary and
thus influence the accretion rate. This would result in a change in luminosity. Selvelli and
Gilmozzi (2013) compared the luminosity and spectral energy distributions of several novae
at different epochs using data from various U V satellites. For most systems, they did not find
a significant change over the time of ten to twenty years. A comparison with new data taken
few decades later would indicate if any variation in the luminosity of the accretion disc is
present on larger time scales.
For the studied dwarf novae, the analysis requires to measure the brightness during several
outbursts. This will enable to determine the total luminosity and accretion rate for each
measurement; from this, the overall accretion during a cycle can be established and then
calculated into an average accretion rate for the system. For nova-like stars (normal ones
and SW Sex type) and old novae, snapshot observations in two U V bands and are sufficient
as the accretion discs are stable, and the average accretion rate can be derived directly.
3.5 RS CVn-Type Stars
RS CVn-type stars are variable stars found in detached binary systems. They are composed
of main-sequence stars with spectral types around G - K . Fekel et al. (1986) gave three properties
required to become a member of this group of variable stars: at least one star must
exhibit emission in the H and K resonance lines of Ca II, which are created in the chromospheres
of stars, systems must show light variations caused by effects other than eclipses,
pulsations, or ellipticity. The more active star must be evolved, and it also has to have spectral
type F, G, or K .
Brightness variations of RS CVn-type systems are caused by the large stellar spots. Typical
brightness fluctuation is around 0.2 mag. The spots are created by high chromospheric
activity, similar to the Sun. Some RS CVn-type systems exhibit brightness variations due to
stellar eclipses superimposed on changes caused by the variation in the spot surface coverage
fraction, e.g. RT And, X Y U M a (Pribulla et al. 2000, 2001). Photometric variability is often
correlated with chromospheric line emissions. U V emission is, by solar analogy, known to
be associated with stellar active and transition regions (Sect. 2.3). These areas on the Sun
are associated with intense magnetic fields, and sunspot activity is enhanced in and around
these magnetically active regions. Such magnetic activity is also detected in RS CVn-type
systems. Montesinos (1998), using combined optical and U V observations, showed a spatial
correlation between photospheric spots and chromospheric plages.
Therefore, photometric observations with a U V satellite could enable studying evolution
of energy loops and magnetic activity, their impact on the formation of active regions,
and stellar spots. Such analysis requires multi-band observations of the whole-phased light
curves of selected objects with a time resolution of up to 10 minutes.
3.6 Reflection Effect in Binary Systems
Reflection effect is crucial in close binaries with extreme temperature differences between
the components. It is also important in connection with exoplanets since some of them (e.g.
hot Jupiters) can be considered extreme cases of binary stars subject to extreme reflection
effects. The reflection effect describes the mutual irradiation of the components in a binary
system and, most importantly, the surface temperatures of the components and the radiation
Springer
24 Page 14 of 34 J. Krtička etal.
field. Because one of the components is typically relatively hot and temperatures on the
irradiated side of the cool component can exceed 10000 K , U V observations are key to our
understanding of this effect.
There are models of the reflection effect with various degrees of sophistication and precision.
Models that are used to calculate the light curves and spectra of eclipsing binaries
are the most popular (Wilson 1990). They usually assume that the irradiated atmospheres
radiate as non-irradiated ones, but with an enhanced effective temperature. Apart from that,
some models take into account a parameterisation of heat redistribution over the surface
and scattered light (Budaj 2011b; Horvat et al. 2019). There are L T E and N L T E models
of stationary irradiated atmospheres in radiative and convective equilibrium (Burrows et al.
2008; Vučkovic et al. 2016) revealing that irradiated atmospheres may have a very complicated
structure with temperature inversions that can lead to the appearance of emission lines.
Finally, there are hydrodynamic simulations of the process (Dobbs-Dixon and Lin 2008) indicating
the presence of an equatorial jet carrying the heat from the irradiated to shadowed
side.
Despite all these efforts on several fronts, there are plenty of open questions that need to
be addressed, and U V observations of binaries with one hot (WD, sdB, sdO) and one cold
component (a red dwarf or a red giant) will play a crucial role. For example: What is the
amount of scattered light and albedo of the irradiated star? Why do some observed albedos
of irradiated stars require values close to or larger than one? What is the efficiency of the
heat transport from irradiated to nonirradiated side in (binary) stars/exoplanets? What is the
structure and radiation field of the irradiated atmosphere? How does it affect the albedo,
convection, shape of the star, gravity, and limb darkening (Ruciňski 1969; Claret and Bloemen
2011)? How does the reflection effect affect stellar and planetary evolution? To answer
these questions, multi-band observations with an S N R of about 100 with a time resolution
of at least 5 minutes are needed.
3.7 Eclipsing Binaries: A Key to Deriving Bolometric Corrections in the UV
Recently, eclipsing binaries with well-known physical parameters of the components were
shown to be a very important tool to derive multi-band (Johnson B, V and Gaia G, GBp,
GRP) bolometric corrections (Bakis, and Eker 2022), which can be used to derive luminosities
of the components with uncertainty as low as one percent. Eker and Baki§ (2023)
increased the number of photometric bands in their method from 5 to 6 by including the
TESS (Ricker et al. 2014, 2015) bandpass to derive bolometric corrections for the TESS
bandpass. They also showed that it is possible to derive luminosities and radii of single stars
with an error of about 2 per cent, which is equivalent to values already published. Thus, increasing
the number of bandpasses to achieve more reliable luminosity and radius of binary
components and single stars is paramount. The key issue of this method is to obtain precise
magnitudes in the desired bandpasses. It is obvious that using magnitudes of stars obtained
in UV, which are only possible by systematic space-based observations of binary systems
and/or single stars, will fill the gap on the U V side of the wavelength regime of the method
described by Bakis, and Eker (2022).
4 Mergers of Intermediate Masses
N-body simulations of Dvořáková et al. (2023) show that about 50% of the merger products
of the binaries are B-type stars. The first post-merger in the phase when the envelope started
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 15 of 34 24
Fig. 3 Empirical model of a FS CMa post-merger. The slowly rotating strongly magnetic B-type star is
surrounded by highly inhomogenous gaseous region. Rotating spots, arms, and expanding regions have been
observed, as well as the material infall and ejecta. Farther from the star, one or two dust rings are present. The
dust region is very clumpy, even large clouds have been detected.
to be transparent was found among FS C M a stars (IRAS 17449+2320, Korčáková et al.
2022). FS C M a stars are a subgroup of stars showing the B[e] phenomenon, i.e., the presence
of the forbidden emission lines and infrared excess (Allen and Swings 1976; Lamers
et al. 1998). These are indicators of a very extended circumstellar gas and dust region. Properties
of several other FS C M a stars indicate that there may be more post-mergers hidden
in this group. However, not every object in the list of FS C M a stars is a post-merger. The
group was defined primarily on the basis of the infrared properties (Sheikina et al. 2000;
Miroshnichenko et al. 2001; Miroshnichenko 2007), which is not a sufficiently sharp criterion.
Therefore, the list contains several binaries (Be/X-ray binary CI Cam, Barsukova et al.
2006; 3 Pup, Miroshnichenko et al. 2020; G G Car, Porter et al. 2021; A S 386, Khokhlov
et al. 2018; or M W C 349A, Tafoya et al. 2004), B[e] supergiant ( M W C 300, Appenzeller
1977), and post-AGB candidates (Hen3-938, Miroshnichenko et al. 1999, CPD-48 5215,
Gauba and Parthasarathy 2004).
Figure 3 shows a model of a FS C M a post-merger. The central star is a magnetic B-/early
A-type star. The magnetic field is generated by mixing during the merger (Schneider et al.
2020). It may reach high values (~6.2 k G in IRAS 17449+2320, Korčáková et al. 2022)
that are comparable to the strongest fields in A p stars. Such a strong magnetic field slows
down the stellar rotation rapidly (Schneider et al. 2020) leading to the observed low rotation
velocities (review in Korčáková 2022). The central star is probably a pulsator, where the
resonance of individual pulsating modes may play a role. The star undergoes episodic material
ejecta approximately once a month. The geometrically extended gaseous disk is very
inhomogeneous. Rotating arms and spots, as well as expanding layers, have been observed.
The expanding layers slow down in some cases, even some material falls back onto the star
(Kučerová et al. 2013). Behind this gaseous disk, one or two dust rings are present. Dust
regions are very clumpy, even large dust clouds were detected around some stars (de Winter
and van den Ancker 1997). The composition of these two rings may be different. Closer to
the star, the graphite grains are present, whereas the outer region is composed of silicates
Springer
24 Page 16 of 34 J. Krtička etal.
(Gauba et al. 2003; Varga et al. 2019). The object has an extended low-density "corona",
probably due to the very strong magnetic field (Moranchel-Basurto et al. 2023). Seeing this
object from the equator, the strong absorption of iron-group elements appears in the U V
spectrum, so-called "iron curtain". The flux may be reduced by approximately an order of
magnitude compared to the classical B-type star (Korčáková et al. 2019). The absorption
lines of the lower excitation stages also appear in the spectrum, because the disk behaves
as a "pseudo-atmosphere". In this case, lines that should never be detected in B-type stars
may be created. The most puzzling and important example is the L i I line resonance doublet
(Korčáková et al. 2020). The U V excess instead of the U V depression may be observed from
the polar regions (Bergner et al. 1990; Korčáková et al. 2022).
The U V radiation is one of the key factors driving the variability in the visible and IR
regions. The absorbed U V energy is redistributed to the longer wavelengths affecting not
only the continuum, but also spectral lines. For example, one of the related processes is
connected with the overpopulation of upper levels. The follow-up cascade of radiative deexcitation
leads to the appearance of the emission lines in the visible and IR. Without the
knowledge of the behaviour of the U V radiation, it is hard to properly decode the information
hidden in the spectral lines. Therefore, U V photometry is one of the essential techniques
for the study such complex objects.
A precise description of the short-term variability on the scale from minutes to hours
allows the search for pulsation modes of the central star. The interference of the pulsation
modes, leading to the so-called beating phenomenon, may be responsible for ejecting
matter in these stars. The determination of the pulsation modes is especially important in
FS C M a post-mergers since these objects are still out of the thermal equilibrium as shown
by simulations of Schneider et al. (2020) and position on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
(Miroshnichenko 2017). On-time scales around seven hours, disk oscillations may be detected;
similar to the disk flickering observed in cataclysmic variables (Bruch 2021) or symbiotic
binaries (Sect. 3.3). To distinguish the disk oscillation from the stellar pulsations, two
bandpasses are necessary since the flickering amplitude is wavelength-dependent.
The photometry on longer time scales in two bands allows one to follow the molecule and
dust formation. Such an event has already been detected in M W C 349 (White and Becker
1985). Since the matter in the disk very efficiently absorbs the U V radiation, a raw guess
of the angle of view is very easy to determine based on the detected U V excess/depression.
The U V properties and its variability are one of the important ways to classify such a heterogenous
group as FS C M a stars, which is the necessary requirement for the search of new
post-mergers.
Even if only one intermediate-mass merger has been found yet in the phase when the
envelope started to be transparent, these post-mergers definitely deserve more attention. As
they represent the most frequent channel of mergers, their contribution to the enrichment
of interstellar matter may be significant. They may also contribute to the enrichment of
intergalactic matter since the simulations of Dvořáková et al. (2023) indicate that the merger
may occur outside the home galaxy. The position of FS C M a stars in the HertzsprungRussell
diagram (Miroshnichenko 2017), around the terminal-age-main-sequence, with the
combination of the simulations of the merger event and evolution (Schneider et al. 2020)
shows that FS C M a post-mergers are still out of thermal equilibrium. These objects offer an
attractive opportunity to study and test stellar structure and evolution models. Last, but not
least, less massive FS C M a post-mergers may be progenitors of magnetic A p stars. Some
of them may offer an explanation for appearance of strong magnetic field in young white
dwarfs.
The requirements for the mission parameters depend on the scientific goal. While for the
search for U V excess or deficiency one UV-band is sufficient, study of variability typically
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 17 of 34 24
requires a combination of far-UV and near-UV bands. For most of the goals S N R of about
50-200 should be sufficient, but the study of short-term variability requires an SNR of up to
1000 and a cadence of 10 s.
5 Star Clusters and ISM
5.1 Photometric Study of Star Clusters
Star clusters, especially young ones, are relatively unexplored in the UV. The understanding
of the UV-bright stars and the populations they reside in - clusters and stellar associations
- can be applied to study these objects in other galaxies. As we are only able to resolve the
stellar populations in the relatively nearby galaxies (up to a few Mpc away), the understanding
of the local clusters and associations dominated by UV-bright stars (Siegel et al. 2019)
is crucial for studying these objects at extragalactic and cosmological distances, where they
cannot be resolved. These distant populations are frequently metal-poor, so studying local
(and those in the Magellanic Clouds) low-metallicity clusters and associations will be instrumental
in testing of isochrones in the low-metallicity populations (Chaboyer and K i m
1995).
Many interesting types of stars (e.g. variables and binaries) can also be investigated in
star clusters. In fact, it is preferable to investigate members of star clusters because we have
additional knowledge about their reddening, distance, age, and metallicity. There are several
types of unique objects that could be reliably identified only in star clusters, mainly due to
their (unusual) position in the cluster colour-magnitude diagrams, where they pose as outliers
that deviate from isochrones. Blue stragglers and extreme horizontal branch stars are
good examples of such objects. Due to their scarcity, they are not well understood, and the
evolutionary pathways that lead to their formation remain in doubt (Michaud et al. 2011).
However, due to their high temperatures when compared to the turnoff point, they emit a copious
amount of U V radiation, especially if the studied cluster is younger than about 1 Gyr.
A U V mission that gathers photometry of these objects would provide helpful data that
would supplement existing datasets and allow us to answer some open questions regarding
these objects. For example, these include the formation scenarios for blue stragglers or extreme
horizontal branch stars (Jadhav and Subramaniam 2021) and the role of binarity in the
observed lack of white dwarfs in open clusters (Bianchi et al. 2011; Anguiano et al. 2022).
When we look at a colour-magnitude diagram of a star cluster, we can usually identify
the main-sequence turnoff (MSTO) point as the position of the bluest (lowest colour
index) main-sequence star in the diagram. Since stars located above this point in the colourmagnitude
diagram evolve away from the main sequence, astrophysicists use MSTOs to estimate
the ages of star clusters. Because stellar rotation alters photometric indices and stars
rotate with different velocities, star clusters show so-called extended main-sequence turnoff
(eMSTO) (Lim et al. 2019). It has been suggested that some clusters have experienced prolonged
star formation and that age variation, together with stellar rotation, is responsible for
the eMSTOs (Goudfrooij et al. 2017). This effect has not been studied in U V so far. Since
the effects of interstellar and differential reddening can be readily identified in U V (Turner
1979; de Meulenaer et al. 2014; Legnardi et al. 2023), investigating eMSTO in this part of
the spectrum should help us to explain this effect.
The observations from Swift U V O T have shown that the isochrones constructed using
U V bands do not match the photometry of the red giants and late-type main-sequence stars
properly (Smith and Cochrane 2020). A possible explanation is that the atmospheric models
Springer
24 Page 18 of 34 J. Krticka etal.
Fig. 4 Extra-galactic clusters in
Andromeda Galaxy (left) and in
the Large Magellanic Cloud
LW 55 IN THE L M C
(right). Images were taken from
Caldwell et al. (2009) and
Kaluzny and Rucinski (2003).
are incomplete in their treatment of the U V absorption and emission lines originating due
to circumstellar envelopes and chromospheric activity (Sect. 2.3). With the U V mission, the
shortcomings of the current models could be tested.
The use of colour-magnitude diagrams in the determination of the cluster parameters is
quite limited in the case of very distant Galactic and extragalactic clusters (for example, see
Fig. 4), where resolving individual members is usually not possible (Piecka and Paunzen
2021). These problems can be overcome by using integrated photometry. Using nearby and
resolved star clusters, one can calibrate integrated photometry in terms of age, reddening,
and metallicity (Lata et al. 2002). With libraries based on population synthesis codes, it
is also possible to determine the total mass and the fraction of red giants of star clusters
(Bridzius et al. 2008). This method is well established, but it has not yet been applied to the
U V region.
The photometric measurements of individual members of clusters in our Galaxy requires
a reasonably narrow point spread function to distinguish between the individual stars. In
general, we do not expect to reach distances larger than about 3 kpc, and anticipate more
strict limitations within the extinction-dominated Galactic disk. Integrated photometry of
star clusters can be conducted for local and extragalactic targets. For both objectives, the
main bandpass should mostly cover the 200-300 nm region. A secondary band covering
wavelengths unreachable from the ground (< 200 nm) would be beneficial. The F o V requirement
is set by the size of the closest cluster included in such a study.
5.2 Deriving Interstellar Extinction in UV
Interstellar dust is an important component of the interstellar medium (ISM). Properties
of the constituent particles are inferred from observations by studying extinction curves
together with polarisation curves, scattered light, dust emission in the continuum, and absorption
in bands (Draine 2003). Although an average extinction law is often assumed when
deriving extinction-corrected magnitudes of stars, looking in different lines of sight shows
variations in the shape of the extinction curve that are connected to changes in the properties
of dust (Jenniskens and Greenberg 1993).
A n extinction curve shows how the attenuation of light (measured, for example, by extinction
Ax) depends on wavelength (Fig. 5). This curve is affected not only by the chemical
composition of the dust (mostly silicates, graphite, ices, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons)
but also by the sizes of the individual particles, ranging from a few microns down to
a couple of nanometres (e.g., Weingartner and Draine 2001). The strongest feature of the
extinction curve observed in near-UV is the extinction bump located at around 217.5 nm
(Stecher 1965).
Based on IR photometric data, Larson and Whittet (2005) found that many high-latitude
clouds in our Galaxy show signs of an increase in the number of smaller particles when
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 19 of 34 24
Fig. 5 Extinction curves for
different lines of sight (Cardelli
et al. 1989).
Computed
Observed
BD+56 524
R = 2.75
HD 48099
R=3.52
Hörschel 36-
R=5.30
2 4 6 8
l/X (//m")
compared with the diffuse I S M of the Galactic disk. Variation in the size distribution of
dust grains should affect not only the strength of the U V extinction bump, but also the
general steepness of the extinction curve in UV. This was explored by Sun et al. (2021), who
made use of the U V data produced by the GALEX mission and found that such a situation
mostly occurs in clouds with a relatively small amount of extinction in the visible part of the
spectrum.
A dedicated U V photometric survey would improve our understanding of this effect.
Additionally, a good choice of photometric bands can help us to distinguish between the
U V continuum extinction and the strength of the bump at 217.5 nm, allowing us to study
the variations in the dust grain populations in better detail. This is important for different
studies of the I S M that focus on variations in extinction curves, the evolution of dust grain
populations, and the formation of molecules.
To maximize the scientific output, it would be ideal to fit as many targets in one field as
possible - for this reason, it would be ideal to have a FoV larger than 1°. Magnitude errors
should be smaller than 0.1 mag, ideally as small as 0.01 mag. While the survey can work
with almost any bandpass in the 200-300 nm region, it would be preferred to make use
of a band that is focused on the wavelengths between 220 nm and 280 nm, which should
best help to capture the information about the profile of the U V extinction bump (when
combined with the available magnitudes at longer wavelengths). A second band centred at
slightly longer (~ 340 nm) or shorter (~ 160 nm) wavelengths would be beneficial to this
study. The far-UV band is preferred because it provides more information.
5.3 Getting Information About the ISM from UV Bow Shocks
There are multiple events that can lead to the formation of shock waves in the ISM. One of
them is the movement of a star with a strong stellar wind and a high velocity with respect
to the local I S M (e.g. van Buren and McCray 1988). The resulting bow-shaped shocks (or
Springer
24 Page 20 of 34 J. Krticka etal.
Fig. 6 Composite U V images of bow shocks in the vicinity of Mira (left) and C W Leo (right) taken by
GALEX. Downloaded from https://galex.stsci.edu/GR6/.
bow shocks) can be observed at various wavelengths, most notably in the infrared (Li and
Draine 2001; Draine and L i 2007), optical (Brown and Bomans 2005), and at the higher
energies as well. In a few cases UV-emitting bow shocks have been found, for example,
around Betelgeuse (Decin et al. 2012), Mira (Martin et al. 2007), and C W Leo (Ladjal et al.
2010) (see Fig. 6).
However, the U V emission of bow shocks is not well-constrained since their observation
in this spectral region is quite challenging. Firstly, their driving stars are often strong U V
emitters, making it difficult to resolve the rather faint, diffuse, and wispy emission of a bow
shock in their proximity. Moreover, some missions such as GALEX intentionally avoided
many bright U V stars, in order to protect its detectors (Choi et al. 2015). Some bow shocks
from Gvaramadze et al. (2010, 2011), Kobulnicky et al. (2016) were serendipitously observed
by Swift UVOT, but so far no clear bow shock emission associated with O and B
stars has been detected in UV.
Detecting these structures in U V would provide valuable data to complement the observations
more routinely done in other bandpasses. One of the main focuses would be to
put constraints on the physical processes that dominate in the bow shock regions. Several
processes may influence the bow shock emission in UV, including absorption (Decin et al.
2012) and scattering by dust particles, emission lines resulting from collisional excitation
(Martin et al. 2007), and to a smaller degree also, inverse Compton scattering (del Valle and
Pohl 2018).
The bow shocks can be detected from frame images focused on regions surrounding
asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars, and O and B stars. Since the angular radius of a bow
shock depends on the distance (and other parameters), a reasonable F o V (~ 1°) is required.
The angular resolution should be sufficiently high to be able to map the structure of the
bow shocks. The magnitude limit is mostly influenced by the observability of O and B stars.
While most of the A G B stars are expected to have muv > 9 mag, O-type stars of interest
have muv > 4 mag (if we focus on objects beyond 1 kpc, m u v > 6 mag). For this reason, it
could be possible to allow having the observed objects saturated in some cases. To be able
to identify bow shocks, the signal-to-noise ratio has to be higher than 3. Although an A G B
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 21 of 34 24
star at 3 kpc could be as bright as muv = 16 mag, the situation changes when the presence
of the ISM is assumed, which would shift the lower limit to muv > 20 mag.
GALEX images suggest that U V bow shocks appear brighter at shorter wavelengths.
While some results are already expected for a near-UV region, a far-UV band should enable
the identification of more bow shocks.
6 Exoplanets
In the past three decades, the characterization of thousands of extra-solar planets allowed
us to make further steps towards the understanding of the origin of life on Earth and the
possible discovery of signs of life outside our Solar System. In terms of methodology, numerous
techniques have proven to be useful for confirming the presence of a planet orbiting
a distant star, such as pulsar timing variations (Wolszczan and Frail 1992), radial velocity
measurements (Mayor and Queloz 1995) or direct imaging (see, e.g. Lagrange et al.
2020). However, the vast majority of known systems were discovered and investigated via
photometric measurements of planetary transits, i.e. when the planet blocks a small but welldetectable
amount of stellar light in coincidence with its orbital period (Henry et al. 2000).
The dominance of transiting planets within the family of known planets is mostly due to
the significant advantage of space-borne photometry: it yields not just precise and accurate
time series, but the lack of diurnal variations allows for the extension of the time domain
compared to ground-based telescopes. Therefore, space telescopes play an important role in
the analysis of these systems.
6.1 Transiting Exoplanetary Systems
While radial velocity measurements are essential to derive the mass ratios and orbital characteristics
of exoplanetary systems, the information provided by photometric transits (and
occultations) significantly increases our knowledge by revealing the size and, therefore, the
density of the planets. The first such confirmation of the presence of transits happened in
the case of the planetary system H D 209458(b) (Charbonneau et al. 2000) while, a few
years later, the transit method was applied for the discovery of OGLE-TR-56 (Konacki et al.
2003). In addition, precise time series associated with individual transits not only reveal a
more precise orbital solution in terms of parameters such as orbital period or inclination,
but also play a key role in understanding the host star (Seager and Mallén-Ornelas 2003).
Although these key discoveries and confirmation of transits were also made by space-borne
photometry (see, e.g. Brown et al. 2001), dedicated space missions such as CoRoT (Barge
et al. 2008), Kepler (Borucki et al. 2010) or TESS (Ricker et al. 2015), literally increased the
number of known such systems by thousands.
Similarly to our Solar System, perturbations occur between different planets orbiting
the same star. By their nature, such perturbations are highly dependent on the mass of the
planets. One of the most easily and precisely observable effect of such perturbations is the
variation in the orbital phase of the planetary companions. Periodic or systematic variations
in the orbital phases cause measurable changes in the transit timings. Observations of these
transit timing variations allow us to determine the masses of the planets (Holman et al.
2010). In addition, perturbations having an intrinsically secular nature also yield observable
changes in the duration of the transit. For instance, the oblateness of the host star causes the
planetary orbit to precess, implying a slight but detectable systematic shift in the duration of
the transits (Szabó et al. 2012). Such measurements therefore reveal intrinsic parameters of
Springer
24 Page 22 of 34 J. Krticka etal.
the host star, like the non-spherical components of its gravitational field. Taking into account
the variations in the parameters of exoplanetary systems, such as transit timing variations or
transit duration variations, it is also possible to reveal the presence of another companions
that would otherwise remain undetected. This is particularly relevant for companions on
orbits with lower inclinations, on which the exoplanets do not transit the star, or have so
small masses that they do not provide sufficiently high amplitude signals in radial velocities.
The shape of transit light curves are also determined by the stellar limb darkening (see,
e.g. Brown et al. 2001). Quantitatively, the limb darkening depends on both the central wavelength
of the observations and the stellar atmospheric parameters (Claret 2004), allowing
further refine the host star parameters (such as the independent measurements of the surface
temperature or spectral type). Limb darkening is more prominent on shorter wavelengths.
Precise space-borne observations are important to manage the correlations between the planetary
radius and the derived limb darkening parameters (Pal 2008). In addition, the presence
of an atmosphere can yield a wavelength-dependent planetary radius (see, e.g. Deming et al.
2019, for an introduction). Stellar spots also affect transiting light curves (Nutzman et al.
2011; Oshagh et al. 2013), and the shorter the wavelength used for observation, the greater
the contrast the stellar spots have, allowing a clear distinction of stellar spots from instrument
noise.
The study of exoplanetary transits is relatively demanding for the mission parameters.
The requested SNR of about 500 within one-hour exposition could be accordingly modified
if faster cadence of about 1 min is needed.
6.2 Activity, Flares, and Star-Planet Interaction
By nature, flares, and the corresponding physical processes (such as coronal mass ejections)
associated with a star harbouring a planetary system affect habitability: the higher the flaring
rate, the more energetic the ionizing radiation threatening the potential life on a planet. On
the other hand, having no flaring activity on a host star might not provide sufficient input
for triggering the formation of fundamental molecules essential to life. Main-sequence stars
with a small mass (i.e. mostly M dwarfs or K dwarfs) are the focus of research in the field
of exoplanets due to the easier detection of planetary companions (see, e.g. Irwin et al.
2011, and the references therein). These objects tend to have an enormous amount of flaring
activity, as shown by recent individual (Vida et al. 2019) and statistical (Seli et al. 2021)
analyses. While observatories like TESS, operating at long wavelengths, provide reliable
constraints in a statistical manner for a large number of objects (see also Seli et al. 2021),
flaring activity is the most prominent at short wavelengths, such as the U V band (Sect. 2.3).
It is well known that stars strongly affect their close cool companions via gravity and
irradiation (see, e.g. Sect. 3). It is less obvious that planets also affect their host stars. Latetype
stars store a significant amount of energy in their surface magnetic fields. Giant planets
on close orbits may have their own magnetic fields and magnetospheres that may interact
with the stellar magnetic fields (see Vidotto 2020, for a review). As the planet moves over
the surface of the star, it may trigger reconnection events that will follow the planet. This
may heat the upper atmosphere of the star and cause variability with a period equal to the
orbital period of the planet. Apart from that, the stellar wind may interact with the planetary
magnetic fields, creating a bow shock and an asymmetry in the circumplanetary material.
This was detected as an early ingress during the transit of WASP-12b in U V with the Hubble
Space Telescope (HST) (Fossati et al. 2010). Detection of this kind of interaction is
important because it would provide information on the magnetic field of the planet, which
is almost impossible to obtain by other methods. The magnetic field of the planet is crucial
for the assessment of the habitability of the planet.
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 23 of 34 24
U V photometry is particularly well suited to study such planet-star interactions. This is
because U V flux originates from the upper atmosphere. U V flux of late-type stars constitutes
only a small fraction of their total energy output. Hence, the U V band is very sensitive to
such high-energy phenomena even if the flux in the visual band remains almost constant.
Study of planet-star interactions will require monitoring of about a dozen stars with massive
close-in planets for weeks. This task is too expensive for large telescopes such as HST and
small-scale missions such as QUVIK can make a significant contribution in this field.
6.3 Exo-Atmospheres at Short Wavelengths - the Border Between Life and Death
U V photometric mission will offer a unique window into the characterization of exoplanetary
atmospheres. The energetic radiation heats the upper layers of planetary atmospheres,
making the atmospheric material easier to escape. In the U V part of the electromagnetic
spectrum, the planetary diameter appears larger, and thus transits are deeper than at longer
wavelengths. This allows us to study the evaporation of atmospheres and atmospheric escape,
which is particularly strong in close-in planets around M-dwarf stars (for example,
GJ436 b, Ehrenreich et al. 2015; Lavie et al. 2017).
There is a well-known gap in the radius distribution of exoplanets (1.6 — 2REarth) and
a complete lack of Neptun-sized exoplanets with orbital periods shorter than 3 days (e.g.
Howard et al. 2012; Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2014; Fulton et al. 2017; Van Eylen et al. 2018).
This is explained as a result of exoatmospheric erosion and has been predicted by many
different escape models (e.g. Lopez et al. 2012; Ginzburg et al. 2018). Observations by
small-sized U V telescopes will help us to understand the atmospheric escape better and give
us a better idea of the capability of the planets to keep their atmospheres. This is especially
important in studying exoplanets in habitable zones that could potentially host extraterrestrial
life.
7 Transiting Dusty Objects: From Exoasteroids to Dusty Discs
Dust is known to scatter and absorb U V radiation very efficiently. At the same time, hot stars
are strong emitters of U V radiation. Consequently, U V telescopes are ideal for detecting and
studying transits of dust clouds in front of sufficiently bright and hot stars. While the nature
and origin of stars and dust are usually specific to a given type of star, the dust obscuration
process is universal.
7.1 Disintegrating Exoplanets
Most of the known exoplanets transit their host stars and feature stable and symmetric transits.
A decade ago, a new class of objects was discovered (Rappaport et al. 2012) that exhibit
asymmetric, strongly variable but periodic transit-like signals. Sometimes they feature
a strange pre-transit brightening. Kepler-1520b became a prototype of such objects. On the
other hand, some transits, such as those of K2-22b (Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2015), look almost
the opposite, with a post-transit brightening. Periods are shorter than one day, and transit
durations are approximately 1 hour.
It turned out that such transits are caused by disintegrating exoplanets that orbit very
close to their host stars. The rocky surface of the planet evaporates and forms an opaque
dusty tail. It is this tail that is causing the transit, while the planet itself is usually too small
Springer
24 Page 24 of 34 J. Krticka etal.
3.2
3.3 I ' ' ' ' ' '
7800.4 7800.5 7800.6 7800.7 7800.8 7800.9 7801 7801.1
HJD-2450000 [d]
Fig. 7 Light curve of WD1145 in the optical region observed in 2017 (Maliuk et al., in preparation). Everything
deeper than an uncertainty (0.02 mag) are transits.
to be detected. The tail (dust cloud) is very sensitive to various processes, such as radiative/gravitational
accelerations, dust evaporation, or condensation. It efficiently scatters the
radiation in the forward direction, causing the above-mentioned pre- or post-transit brightenings,
depending on whether the tail is trailing or leading the planet. Such planets might
have lost a significant fraction of their mass, exposing their naked cores (Perez-Becker and
Chiang 2013). Consequently, the properties of the dust tail reflect the bulk (not only the surface)
chemical composition of the planet and provide a unique tool for probing the interiors
of the planet.
There are half a dozen of such objects. Generally, their transits would be difficult to
detect in U V since stars are typically of later spectral types (F-M), faint (V = 16 mag),
and the transit depth is often below 1%. However, there are related objects that are either
brighter and/or the transits are deeper, and these are mentioned in Sect. 7.2.1. Ongoing and
planned space missions such as TESS (Ricker et al. 2015) and PLATO (Rauer et al. 2014)
may discover brighter objects of this kind.
7.2 Exoasteroids
Since the discovery of disintegrating exoplanets, even smaller (minor) bodies have been
detected to orbit and transit other stars - "exoasteroids". White dwarfs offer an advantage
in detecting such objects. Their radii are 100 times smaller than the Sun, which enables the
detection of relatively small objects. The first known exoasteroids were discovered orbiting
a white dwarf named WD1145+017 (Vanderburg et al. 2015, WD1145). They have orbital
periods of about 4-5 hours, and transits in the optical region may be 40-60% deep. A n
example of the light curve from the 2017 season is shown in Fig. 7. One can see numerous
dust clouds associated with asteroids passing in front of the star, causing eclipses. This
behaviour is in many respects similar to the disintegrating exoplanets mentioned above. The
nature and variability of such transits call for simultaneous multi-wavelength observations
to put constraints on the chemical composition and properties of dust. Surprisingly, U V
observations unravelled that transits at these wavelengths are significantly shallower than
those in the optical region (Hallakoun et al. 2017; X u et al. 2019). The reason for that is still
an open question, but it may be a combination of two factors: an underlying absorption by
a co-planar gas disk and a forward scattering on large dust particles (Xu et al. 2019; Budaj
et al. 2022).
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 25 of 34 24
The discovery of such exoasteroids solves a missing chain in our understanding of the
chemical composition of white dwarfs. Many white dwarfs show heavy elements in their
spectra. However, these elements should have quickly sunk due to the strong gravity of
the star (Paquette et al. 1986). WD1145 unravelled the expected chain of events before our
eyes for the first time (Debes and Sigurdsson 2002): stars have planetary systems; orbits
of bodies are disturbed by mass loss during the A G B phase; they get close to the W D (a
remnant of the A G B star) and are disrupted into pieces, forming dust clouds; dust turns into
a gaseous disk as it approaches the hot star; and, finally, gas accretes onto the surface of
the star, contaminating its chemical composition. Consequently, by measuring the chemical
composition of the star or its gaseous disk, we also infer the chemical composition of the
disrupted body. For example, it appears that W D 1145 recently encountered and accreted a
body of Earth-like composition (Xu et al. 2016; Fortin-Archambault et al. 2020; Budaj et al.
2022).
The characteristic time scale and the amplitude of variability due to transits of exoasteroids
are 10 minutes and 0.1 mag, respectively. Required SNR and cadence are 50 and
2 min, respectively. A n advantage of such white dwarfs is that they are hot (characteristic
spectral type is DB) but relatively faint (U = 17-18 mag).
Since the discovery of W D 1145, there has been increasing evidence that asteroids, planets
or their remnants are also orbiting other white dwarfs: Z T F J013906.17+524536.89
(Vanderbosch et al. 2020), SDSS J122859.93+104032.9 (Manser et al. 2019), and
W D J091405.30+191412.25 (Gansicke et al. 2019). Most recently, a Jupiter size planet
was directly detected to transit W D 1856+534 (Vanderburg et al. 2020). However, there are
still only a handful of such objects, and little is known about their incidence, orbits, masses,
chemical composition, evolution, origin, and other properties. Increasing these numbers is
a crucial next step in answering all these questions. A small U V telescope may be used
to search for such variability by targeted observations of selected white dwarfs, by postprocessing
of full-frame images, or for follow-up observations of new objects detected by
other missions (TESS, PLATO).
U V photometry will verify the nature of the event. Dust clouds will have variable asymmetric
transits of different depths at different wavelengths. Based on the shape of the transit,
it will be possible to put constraints on the shape of the dust cloud (e.g. trailing/leading tail,
disk).
Dust properties, such as particle sizes and chemical composition, are another important
question that requires multi-wavelength observations. U V photometry in two bandpasses
will constrain these properties. However, since the depths of transits are variable, they will
have to be coordinated with additional simultaneous observations in the optical and IR regions.
Apart from that, it will be possible to put constraints on the total amount of dust
and its production rate, which will constraint the masses and lifetimes of the dust-producing
bodies.
A n advantage of the U V region is that it is most sensitive to small dust particles
(<0.1 /xm) that are difficult to detect at longer wavelengths. Consequently, transits may
be deeper in the U V region and may not even be seen at other wavelengths.
7.2.1 Related Objects
There are stars that are brighter than the above-mentioned white dwarfs and are related to
the topic. Boyajian's star (Boyajian et al. 2016) is a famous example. It is an F-type and
V = 12 mag star. Its Kepler light curve shows a few strong dimming events that are 10-20%
deep, asymmetric, and aperiodic. Ground-based follow-up observations revealed multiple
Springer
24 Page 26 of 34 J. Krtička etal.
dips of about 1% (Boyajian et al. 2018). It is a 'normal' star on the main sequence, not a
young star. Multi-wavelength observations indicate that this variability is compatible with
a dust extinction caused by a swarm of comets (Bodman and Quillen 2016) or dust clouds
associated with more massive bodies such as asteroids (Neslušan and Budaj 2017). TESS
and PLATO missions should discover more objects of this kind. Characteristic timescale
and amplitude of variability are 1 day and 0.01-0.1 mag, respectively. This translates into
SNR of about 200 and the cadence < 1 day that is required.
7.3 Eclipses by Dusty Disks and Rings
There are also other dusty objects much larger than the aforementioned minor bodies that
transit stars. Some long-period eclipsing binary stars have very peculiar, variable, and asymmetric
eclipses such as e Aur (spectral type F0, V = 2.9 mag). It is a bright binary star with
an orbital period of 27 yr and deep eclipses lasting for almost 2 yr (Ludendorff 1903). The
fascinating story of this star dates back 200 years and is full of challenges, twists, and turns.
The binary consists of a giant F star and a mysterious huge invisible component. Only multiwavelength
and interferometric observations during the latest eclipse proved the nature of
the companion, which is a cool dusty disk (Kloppenborg et al. 2010). Nevertheless, it was
widely believed that the disk was inclined to the orbital plane and that the light from the F
star penetrated through the central hole in the disk, causing mid-eclipse brightening (Wilson
1971; Carroll etal. 1991). Surprisingly, it was shown that a co-planar but flared disk geometry
(with a vertical thickness increasing with distance) and forward scattering could explain
the strange eclipse more naturally (Chadima et al. 2011; Budaj 2011a). Such objects are
rare, and we know of only a few long-period binaries with such dusty disks. However, their
numbers are growing, and most of them were discovered only during the last decade, thanks
to modern surveys and their combination with digitised archival data dating back more than
a century. The nature/origin of their variability, central stars, disks, and properties (shape,
dynamics, dust particle sizes, and chemical composition) are still a matter of debate. The
characteristic duration and amplitude of variability are 1 yr and 0.1-1 mag., respectively.
The S N R and the cadence required are about 100 and 1-10 days, respectively.
From the shape, duration, and variability of the eclipse, it will be possible to identify
disks, rings, holes, gaps, clouds, or warps if present. Some of these structures may be associated
with otherwise invisible small bodies orbiting inside the disk, which is interesting
from the point of view of the planet formation (Kenworthy and Mamajek 2015). A n advantage
of the U V region is, again, that it is more sensitive to dust, and it may detect smaller
dust particles that are invisible at longer wavelengths. If the U V observations are combined
with observations at other wavelengths1
, this will put constraints on the dust particle size,
its chemical composition, and the total mass of the dust.
Apart from that, observations in the U V region may help solve the main problem: what
is inside the dusty disk? The light from this embedded object is heavily attenuated by the
disk, which makes it difficult to detect the object. However, if this is a hot object, the disk
atmosphere will efficiently scatter its U V light towards the observer, and the object may be
detected in UV. During the eclipse, the main source of the light is suppressed, which further
facilitates the detection of the hidden, hot object. This can be used not only for dusty but
also for gaseous disks. U V photometry can be combined with spectroscopy, interferometry,
and photometry at other wavelengths, to get a deeper insight into the structure of the whole
system (Brož et al. 2021).
For example ZTF data covering optical region (Bellm et al. 2019) may be very useful.
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 27 of 34 24
Another similar class of objects on a completely different scale are possible transiting
circum-planetary (exoplanetary) rings or exorings. The presence of such rings has been recently
hypothesised for some transiting exoplanets. It is related to the problem that the radii
of some exoplanets are so large that their average densities are of the order of 0.1 g/cm3
,
which is an unexpectedly low value. The presence of exorings around these planets is an alternative
solution of this problem (Akinsanmi et al. 2020; Piro and Vissapragada 2020). U V
and IR observations are of crucial importance for detecting such rings. From optical observations
alone, it is almost impossible to distinguish whether the transit is due to a seemingly
large planet or a small planet with a dusty ring. A n example is the exoplanet HIP 41378
orbiting a bright (V = 8.9 mag) F8-type star (Akinsanmi et al. 2020).
There are also other fascinating events/stars in this category. One of the biggest and
brightest stars in the sky, a red supergiant star Betelgeuse (spectral type M l la, V =
0.0 mag), recently dimmed unexpectedly by a factor of 3, reaching a historical minimum in
2020 (Guinan et al. 2020). A n increased U V continuum was observed prior to the dimming.
The nature/origin of the variability is an open question. There were speculations about an
imminent supernova eruption. However, U V observations with HST indicated that it could
be due to a dust cloud passing in front of the star (Dupree et al. 2020). Another question
arises about the origin and properties of the dust cloud. It might have originated from the
star itself (see also Sect. 2.7). U V observations would be valuable, since the IR observations
did not detect any significant change in brightness (Gehrz et al. 2020; Jadlovsky et al. 2023).
Characteristic duration and amplitude of variability are 1 month and 1 mag. This translates
into S N R and cadence that are required of about 100 and 1 week, respectively.
R Coronae Borealis (RCB) stars are another type of supergiants featuring irregular, several
magnitudes deep fading events that may last for months or years. They are of spectral
type F-G, hydrogen-poor, carbon-rich, and eclipses are most likely caused by the dust condensation
in the vicinity of the star, but the nature of the stars and the events are not clear.
7.4 Dippers
Young dipper stars experience eclipses by dusty disks too. About 20-30% of classical T Tau
stars are dippers (Alencar et al. 2010; Morales-Calderon et al. 2011). Most of these young
stars are of late spectral types ( K - M ) and feature dusty protoplanetary disks. Such a disk
may have a complicated structure with an inner disk that is misaligned with the outer disk.
Day-long eclipses are often observed in these stars. It is believed that they are caused by
dust from the inner disk that is nearly edge-on, causing an occultation of the star. Consequently,
the light curve is very sensitive to any dust clumps at the edges of the inner disk.
However, the nature of these dust clumps is unknown. They may be due to warps in the inner
disk, vortices, or clumps associated with planet formation (Ansdell et al. 2016) or may be
associated with magnetospheric accretion (Bodman et al. 2017). Dips may be quasi-periodic
or aperiodic. The characteristic duration and the amplitude of the variability are 1 day and
0.1 mag, respectively. The required S N R is about 100 and a cadence of about a few hours.
There is another group of young stars called UXors after the prototype U X Ori. They are
very similar to the above-mentioned dipper stars but are slightly more massive, hotter, and
are often associated with Herbig Ae/Be stars (Grinin et al. 1991). They feature an infrared
excess indicating a dusty disk, semi-regular dimmings on the time scales of months to years,
and possible brightenings due to accretion or rotational modulation of variability due to
spots.
Long-term multi-wavelength photometry will determine a possible periodicity of the
events and put constraints on the geometry of the inner disk and dust clouds. In the case
Springer
24 Page 28 of 34 J. Krticka etal.
that the dips are periodic, it will be possible to locate their source based on the period. This
may lead to the discovery of dust clouds or holes associated with planet formation. U V observations
will be quite sensitive to such structures. They are also ideal for detecting hot
spots on the surface of the star and determination of the rotational period of the star. Such
spots are associated with magnetospheric accretion, which, in turn, indicates the presence of
magnetic fields. This will put important constraints on the corotation and Alfven radii that
control the magnetospheric accretion and eventually shed more light on the origin of dips.
Typical dipper stars (Ansdell et al. 2016) are K - M stars with 7 magnitudes in the range
8-13 mag, which corresponds to U magnitudes of about 14-19 mag. Consequently, those
dipper stars and UXors that are brighter and hotter should be observable with a small U V
telescope.
Multi-wavelength observations will also put constraints on the dust properties and chemical
composition. Using two bandpasses in U V would help to constrain the temperature of
the star from the slope of its continuum. However, since most of these dipper stars are of
late spectral types and faint, we do not expect to detect many of them in the far-UV band.
8 Conclusions
We have demonstrated the impact of a small-size two-band U V photometric satellite on
the astrophysics of stars and stellar systems. We have shown that U V mission can improve
our understanding of physics and evolution of virtually all types of stars, including hot and
cool main-sequence stars, supergiants, and compact remnants such as neutron stars. U V
photometry provides constraints for precise determination of binary parameters, probes the
circumbinary environment, and leads to significantly better understanding of different evolutionary
stages of binaries including stellar mergers. Most conveniently, stellar physics can
be tested for members of star clusters taking advantage of the common distance of all its
members. U V mission can provide crucial information on exoplanets, including their basic
parameters, atmospheres, and especially their interaction with host stars. U V observations
can probe also other parts of exoplanetary systems from exoasteroids to large dusty disks.
Ground-braking observations can be obtained already using a single-band U V mission.
However, we have demonstrated that including a second band can tremendously increase
the scientific output of the mission. The optimal combination includes far-UV and near-UV
bands.
We have listed the requirements that the satellite should met to fulfill individual scientific
goals. The required parameters include the limiting magnitudes, final signal to noise ratio,
and cadence of observations.
Acknowledgement JBu was supported by V E G A 2/0031/22 and APVV-20-148 grants. JBe acknowledges
support from the German Science Foundation (DFG) projects B U 777-17-1 and BE 7886/2-1.
Author Contribution JK, JBe, JBu, DK, AP, MP and M Z contributed equally to this work.
Funding Note Open access publishing supported by the National Technical Library in Prague.
Declarations
Competing Interests The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 29 of 34 24
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence,
and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the
article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is
not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.Org/licenses/by/4.0/.
References
Abramkin V, Pavlov GG, Shibanov Y, Kargaltsev O (2022) Astrophys J 924:128
Aerts C, Símon-Díaz S, Bloemen S et al (2017) Astron Astrophys 602:A32
Akinsanmi B, Santos NC, Faria JP et al (2020) Astron Astrophys 635:L8
Akras S, Guzman-Ramirez L, Leal-Ferreira ML, Ramos-Larios G (2019) Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 240:21
Alencar SHP, Teixeira PS, Guimaraes M M et al (2010) Astron Astrophys 519:A88
Allen DA, Swings JP (1976) Astron Astrophys 47:293
Allred JC, Hawley SL, Abbett WP, Carlsson M (2006) Astrophys J 644:484
Andersen J (1991) Astron Astrophys Rev 3:91
Anguiano B, Majewski SR, Stassun K G et al (2022) Astron J 164:126
Ansdell M , Gaidos E, Rappaport SA et al (2016) Astrophys J 816:69
Antoniadis J, Freire PCC, Wex N et al (2013) Science 340:448
Appenzeller I (1977) Astron Astrophys 61:21
Auvergne M , Bodin P, Boisnard L et al (2009) Astron Astrophys 506:411
Ayres TR, Marstad NC, Linsky JL (1981) Astrophys J 247:545
Baade D, Rivinius T, Pigulski A et al (2016) Astron Astrophys 588:A56
Bakis, V, Eker Z (2022) Acta Astron 72:195
Baliunas SL, Donahue RA, Soon W H et al (1995) Astrophys J 438:269
Balona L A (2011) Mon Not R Astron Soc 415:1691
Balona L A (2017) Mon Not R Astron Soc 467:1830
Barge P, Baglin A, Auvergne M et al (2008) Astron Astrophys 482:L17
Barnard M , Venter C, Harding AK, Kalapotharakos C, Johnson TJ (2022) Astrophys J 925:184
Barsukova EA, Borisov NV, Burenkov A N et al (2006) Astron Rep 50:664
Basu S (2018) In: Workshop on Astrophysical Opacities. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference
Series, vol 515, p 13
Bedding TR, Mosser B, Huber D et al (2011) Nature 471:608
Belczyfiski K, Mikolajewska J, Munari U , Ivison RJ, Friedjung M (2000) Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser
146:407
Belkacem K, Goupil MJ, Dupret M A et al (2011) Astron Astrophys 530:A142
Bellm EC, Kulkami SR, Graham MJ et al (2019) Publ Astron Soc Pac 131:018002
Bergner Y K , Miroshnichenko AS, Sudnik IS et al (1990) Astrofizika 32:203
Bianchi L, Herald J, Efremova B et al (2011) Astrophys Space Sci 335:161
Blomme R, Mahy L, Catala C et al (2011) Astron Astrophys 533:A4
Bodman EHL, Quillen A (2016) Astrophys J 819:L34
Bodman EHL, Quillen AC, Ansdell M et al (2017) Mon Not R Astron Soc 470:202
Borucki WJ, Koch D, Basri G et al (2010) Science 327:977
Boyajian TS, LaCourse D M , Rappaport SA et al (2016) Mon Not R Astron Soc 457:3988
Boyajian TS, Alonso R, Ammerman A et al (2018) Astrophys J 853:L8
Bridžius A, Narbutis D, Stonkuté R Deveikis V, Vansevičius V (2008) Balt Astron 17:337
Brogaard K, VandenBerg DA, Bruntt H et al (2012) Astron Astrophys 543:A106
Brown D, Bomans DJ (2005) Astron Astrophys 439:183
Brown TM, Charbonneau D, Gilliland RL, Noyes RW, Burrows A (2001) Astrophys J 552:699
Brož M , Mourard D, Budaj J et al (2021) Astron Astrophys 645:A51
Bruch A (2021) Mon Not R Astron Soc 503:953
Budaj J (2011a) Astron Astrophys 532:L12
Budaj J (201 lb) Astron J 141:59
Budaj J, Maliuk A, Hubeny I (2022) Astron Astrophys 660:A72
Burrows A, Budaj J, Hubeny I (2008) Astrophys J 678:1436
Caldwell N, Harding P, Morrison H et al (2009) Astron J 137:94
Springer
24 Page 30 of 34 J. Krtička etal.
Cardelli JA, Clayton GC, Mathis JS (1989) Astrophys J 345:245
Carroll SM, Guinan EF, McCook GP, Donahue RA (1991) Astrophys J 367:278
Chaboyer B, Kim Y-C (1995) Astrophys J 454:767
Chadima P, Harmanec P, Bennett PD et al (2011) Astron Astrophys 530:A146
Charbonneau D, Brown TM, Latham DW, Mayor M (2000) Astrophys J 529:L45
Chatterjee P, Nandy D, Choudhuri A R (2004) Astron Astrophys 427:1019
CHIME/FRB Collaboration (2020) Nature 587:54
Choi Y-J, Min K-W, Seon K-I (2015) Astrophys J 800:132
Christophe S, Ballot J, Ouazzani RM, Antoci V, Salmon SJAJ (2018) Astron Astrophys 618:A47
Claret A (2004) Astron Astrophys 428:1001
Claret A, Bloemen S (2011) Astron Astrophys 529:A75
Claret A, Torres G (2018) Astrophys J 859:100
de Meulenaer P, Narbutis D, Mineikis T, Vansevičius V (2014) Astron Astrophys 569:A4
De Ridder J, Barban C, Baudin F et al (2009) Nature 459:398
de Winter D, van den Ancker M E (1997) Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 121:275
Debes JH, Sigurdsson S (2002) Astrophys J 572:556
Decin L, Cox NLJ, Royer P et al (2012) Astron Astrophys 548:A l 13
del Valle MV, Pohl M (2018) Astrophys J 864:19
Deming D, Louie D, Sheets H (2019) Publ Astron Soc Pac 131:013001
Dharmawardena TE, Mairs S, Scicluna P et al (2020) Astrophys J 897:L9
Dobbs-Dixon I, Lin DNC (2008) Astrophys J 673:513
Doyle JG, Byrne PB, van den Oord GHJ (1989) Astron Astrophys 224:153
Draine BT (2003) Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 41:241
Draine BT, Li A (2007) Astrophys J 657:810
Dupree AK, Strassmeier KG, Matthews LD et al (2020) Astrophys J 899:68
Dvořáková N, Dinnbier F, Korčáková D, Kroupa P (2023). In preparation
Ehrenreich D, Bourrier V, Wheatley PJ et al (2015) Nature 522:459
Eker Z, Bakis. V (2023) Mon Not R Astron Soc 523:2440
Fekel FC, Moffett TJ, Henry GW (1986) Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 60:551
Fortin-Archambault M , Dufour P, X u S (2020) Astrophys J 888:47
Fossati L, Haswell CA, Froning CS et al (2010) Astrophys J 714:L222
Froning CS, Kowalski A, France K et al (2019) Astrophys J 87LL26
Fulton BJ, Petigura EA, Howard AW et al (2017) Astron J 154:109
Gaia Collaboration (2020). VizieR Online Data Catalog, 1/350
Gaia Collaboration, Brown AGA, Vallenari A et al (2021) Astron Astrophys 649: A l
Gansicke BT, Schreiber MR, Toloza O et al (2019) Nature 576:61
Gauba G, Parthasarathy M (2004) Astron Astrophys 417:201
Gauba G, Parthasarathy M , Kumar B, Yadav RKS, Sagar R (2003) Astron Astrophys 404:305
Gehrz RD, Marchetti J, McMillan S et al. (2020) The Astronomer's Telegram 13518, 1
Ginzburg S, Schlichting HE, Sari R (2018) Mon Not R Astron Soc 476:759
Gonzalez D, Reisenegger A (2010) Astron Astrophys 522:A16
Goudfrooij P, Girardi L, Correnti M (2017) Astrophys J 846:22
Graczyk D, Pietrzyňski G, Galan C et al (2021) Astron Astrophys 649:A109
Granzer T, Schiissler M , Caligari P, Strassmeier K G (2000) Astron Astrophys 355:1087
Grinin VP, Kiselev NN, Minikulov NK, Chernova GP, Voshchinnikov N V (1991) Astrophys Space Sci
186:283
Guillot S, Kerr M , Ray PS et al (2019) Astrophys J 887:L27
Guinan EF, Engle SG (2007). E-prints, arXiv:0711.1530
Guinan EF, Ribas I, Fitzpatrick EL et al (2000) Astrophys J 544:409
Guinan E, Wasatonic R, Calderwood T, Carona D (2020) The Astronomer's Telegram 13512, 1
Guzik JA, Roth M (2021) Front Astron Space Sci 8:97
Guzik JA, Kaye AB, Bradley PA, Cox A N , Neuforge C (2000) Astrophys J 542:L57
Gvaramadze VV, Kroupa P, Pflamm-Altenburg J (2010) Astron Astrophys 519:A33
Gvaramadze VV, Pflamm-Altenburg J, Kroupa P (2011) Astron Astrophys 525:A17
Haisch B, Strong KT, Rodono M (1991) Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 29:275
Hallakoun N, Xu S, Maoz D et al (2017) Mon Not R Astron Soc 469:3213
Hallam KL, Wolff CL (1981) Astrophys J 248:L73
Harder JW, Fontenla JM, Pilewskie P, Richard EC, Woods TN (2009) Geophys Res Lett 36:L07801
Henry GW, Marcy GW, Butler RP, Vogt SS (2000) Astrophys J 529:L41
Hobbs G, Lyne AG, Kramer M , Martin CE, Jordan C (2004) Mon Not R Astron Soc 353:1311
H0g E, Fabricius C, Makarov V V et al (2000) Astron Astrophys 355:L27
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 31 of 34 24
Holman MJ, Fabrycky DC, Ragozzine D et al (2010) Science 330:51
Horvat M , Conroy KE, Jones D, Prsa A (2019) Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 240:36
Howard AW, Marcy GW, Bryson ST et al (2012) Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 201:15
Humphreys RM, Jones TJ (2022) Astron J 163:103
Humphreys RM, Davidson K, Richards AMS et al (2021) Astron J 161:98
Hutsemekers D (1985) Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 60:373
Iglesias CA, Rogers FJ, Wilson B G (1992) Astrophys J 397:717
Ignáce R, Fullard A, Shrestha M et al (2022) Astrophys J 933:5
Ífiiguez-Pascual D, Viganó D, Torres DF (2022) Mon Not R Astron Soc 516:2475
Irwin JM, Quinn SN, Berta Z K et al (2011) Astrophys J 742:123
Ivanova N, Justham S, Chen X et al (2013) Astron Astrophys Rev 21:59
Jadhav VV, Subramaniam A (2021) Mon Not R Astron Soc 507:1699
Jadlovský D, Krtička J, Paunzen E, Štefl V (2023) New Astron 99:101962
Jenniskens P, Greenberg JM (1993) Astron Astrophys 274:439
Johnson HR, Luttermoser DG (1987) Astrophys J 314:329
Kaluzny J, Rucinski SM (2003) Astron J 126:237
Kenworthy M A , Mamajek EE (2015) Astrophys J 800:126
Khokhlov SA, Miroshnichenko AS, Zharikov SV et al (2018) Astrophys J 856:158
Kloppenborg B, Stencel R, Monnier JD et al (2010) Nature 464:870
Knigge C, Baraffe I, Patterson J (2011) Astrophys J Suppl Ser 194:28
Kobulnicky HA, Chick WT, Schurhammer DP et al (2016) Astrophys J Suppl Ser 227:18
Kochukhov O, Ryabchikova TA (2018) Mon Not R Astron Soc 474:2787
Konacki M , Torres G, Jha S, Sasselov DD (2003) Nature 421:507
Kopp F, Horvath JE, Hadjimichef D, Vasconcellos CAZ, Hess PO (2023) Int J Mod Phys D 32:2350046
Korčáková D (2022) FS CMa stars: History, Properties, and Challenges. Habilitation thesis, Faculty of Mathematics
and Physics, Charles University, Prague
Korčáková D, Shore SN, Miroshnichenko A et al (2019) Radiative signatures from the cosmos. Werner K,
Stehle C, Rauch T, Lanz T (eds) ASP conference series, vol 519, p 155
Korčáková D, Miroshnichenko AS, Zharikov SV et al (2020) Mem Soc Astron Ital 91:118
Korčáková D, Sestito F, Manset N et al (2022) Astron Astrophys 659:A35
Kowalski AF, Allred JC (2018) Astrophys J 852:61
Krtička J, Feldmeier A (2018) Astron Astrophys 617:A121
Krtička J, Mikulášek Z, Zverko J, Prvák M (2014) In: Mathys G, Griffin ER, Kochukhov O, Monier R,
Wahlgren G M (eds) Putting a stars into context: evolution, environment, and related stars, pp 205-213
Krtička J, Mikulášek Z, Henry G W et al (2019) Astron Astrophys 625:A34
Krtička J, Mikulášek Z, Kurfurst P, Oksala M E (2022) Astron Astrophys 659:A37
Krtičková I, Krtička J (2018) Mon Not R Astron Soc 477:236
Kučerová B, Korčáková D, Polster J et al (2013) Astron Astrophys 554:A143
Kurtz DW (1990) Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 28:607
Labadie-Bartz J, Pepper J, McSwain M V et al (2017) Astron J 153:252
Ladjal D, Barlow MJ, Groenewegen MAT et al (2010) Astron Astrophys 518:L141
Lagrange A M , Rubini P, Nowak M et al (2020) Astron Astrophys 642:A18
Lamers HJGLM, Zickgraf F-J, de Winter D, Houziaux L, Zorec J (1998) Astron Astrophys 340:117
Lanz T, Artru MC, Le Dourneuf M , Hubeny I (1996) Astron Astrophys 309:218
Larson KA, Whittet DCB (2005) Astrophys J 623:897
Lata S, Pandey AK, Sagar R, Mohan V (2002) Astron Astrophys 388:158
Lavie B, Ehrenreich D, Bourrier V et al (2017) Astron Astrophys 605:L7
Legnardi MV, Milone AR Cordoni G et al (2023) Mon Not R Astron Soc 522:367
Levesque EM, Massey P (2020) Astrophys J 89LL37
Li A, Draine BT (2001) Astrophys J 554:778
Lim B, Rauw G, Naze Y et al (2019) Nat Astron 3:76
Lopez ED, Fortney JJ, Miller N (2012) Astrophys J 761:59
Lorimer DR, Kramer M (2004) Handbook of pulsar astronomy, vol 4
Loukaidou GA, Gazeas KD, Palafouta S et al (2022) Mon Not R Astron Soc 514:5528
Ludendorff H (1903) Astron Nachr 164:81
Luna GJM, Sokoloski JL, Mukai K, Nelson T (2013) Astron Astrophys 559:A6
Manser CJ, Gansicke BT, Eggl S et al (2019) Science 364:66
Martin DC, Seibert M , Neill JD et al (2007) Nature 448:780
Mayor M , Queloz D (1995) Nature 378:355
Merc J, Gális R, Wolf M (2019) Res Notes Am Astron Soc 3:28
Merc J, Beck PG, Mathur S, Garcia RA (2023). E-prints, arXiv:2312.16126
Springer
24 Page 32 of 34 J. Krtička etal.
Michaud G, Richer J, Richard O (2011) Astron Astrophys 529:A60
Miglio A, Chiappini C, Morel T et al (2013) Mon Not R Astron Soc 429:423
Mignani RP (2011) Adv Space Res 47:1281
Mikolajewska J (2012) Bait Astron 21:5
Mikulášek Z, Krtička J, Henry GW et al (2011) Astron Astrophys 534:L5
Mikulášek Z, Krtička J, Shultz M E et al (2020) In: Wade G, Alecian E, Bohlender D, Sigut A (eds) Stellar
magnetism: a workshop in honour of the career and contributions of John D. Landstreet, Proceedings
PAS, vol 11, pp 46-53
Miroshnichenko AS (2007) Astrophys J 667:497
Miroshnichenko AS (2017) The B[e] phenomenon: forty years of studies. Miroshnichenko A, Zharikov S,
Korčáková D, Wolf M (eds) Astronomical society of the Pacific conference series, vol 508, p 285
Miroshnichenko AS, Gray RO, Vieira SLA, Kuratov KS, Bergner Y K (1999) Astron Astrophys 347:137
Miroshnichenko AS, Levato H, Bjorkman KS, Grosso M (2001) Astron Astrophys 371:600
Miroshnichenko AS, Danford S, Zharikov SV et al (2020) Astrophys J 897:48
Moe M , Di Stefano R (2017) Astrophys J Suppl Ser 230:15
Montargěs M , Cannon E, Lagadec E et al (2021) In: Siebert A, Baillié K, Lagadec E, Lagarde N, Malzac J,
Marquette JB, N'Diaye M , Richard J, Venot O (eds) SF2A-2021: proceedings of the annual meeting of
the French Society of Astron. Astrophys., pp 13-18
Montesinos B (1998) Ultraviolet Astrophysics Beyond the IUE Final Archive. Wamsteker W, Gonzalez Riestra
R, Harris B (eds) ESA Special Publication, vol 413 p 91
Morales-Calderón M , Stauffer JR, Hillenbrand L A et al (2011) Astrophys J 733:50
Moranchel-Basurto A, Korčáková D, Chametla RO (2023) Mon Not R Astron Soc 523:5554
Mukai K, Luna GJM, Cusumano G et al (2016) Mon Not R Astron Soc 461:L1
Munari U (2019) The impact of binary stars on stellar evolution, vol 54 p 77
Munari U, Traven G, Masetti N et al (2021) Mon Not R Astron Soc 505:6121
NeslušanL, Budaj J (2017) Astron Astrophys 600:A86
Nutzman PA, Fabrycky DC, Fortney JJ (2011) Astrophys J 740:L10
Oksala ME, Kochukhov O, Krtička J et al (2015) Mon Not R Astron Soc 451:2015
Oshagh M , Boisse I, Boué G et al (2013) Astron Astrophys 549:A35
Paczynski B (1976) In: Eggleton P, Mitton S, Whelan J (eds) Structure and evolution of close binary systems,
IAU symposia, vol 73, p 75. Springer, Dordrecht
Paczynski B, Sienkiewicz R (1984) Astrophys J 286:332
Pál A (2008) Mon Not R Astron Soc 390:281
Pala AF, Gänsicke BT, Townsley D et al (2017) Mon Not R Astron Soc 466:2855
Paquette C, Pelletier C, Fontaine G, Michaud G (1986) Astrophys J Suppl Ser 61:197
Pavlovski K, Harmanec P, Božič H et al (1997) Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 125:75
Perez-Becker D, Chiang E (2013) Mon Not R Astron Soc 433:2294
Peterson D M (1970) Astrophys J 161:685
Petri J (2015) Astron Astrophys 574:A51
Petroff E, Hessels JWT, Lorimer DR (2022) Astron Astrophys Rev 30:2
Piecka M , Paunzen E (2021). E-prints, arXiv:2107.07230
Pigulski A, Baran A, Bzowski M et al (2019) Science case for UVSat space mission, https://uvsat.camk.edu.
pl/files/UVSAT_Opracownai_Photo.pdf
Piro AL, Vissapragada S (2020) Astron J 159:131
Podsiadlowski P, Rappaport S, Pfahl ED (2002) Astrophys J 565:1107
Porter A, Grant D, Blundell K, Lee S (2021) Mon Not R Astron Soc 501:5554
Pribulla T, Chochol D, Milano L et al (2000) Astron Astrophys 362:169
Pribulla T, Chochol D, Heckert PA et al (2001) Astron Astrophys 371:997
Prvák M , Liška J, Krtička J, Mikulášek Z, Lüftinger T (2015) Astron Astrophys 584:A17
Rappaport S, Levine A, Chiang E et al (2012) Astrophys J 752:1
Rauer H, Catala C, Aerts C et al (2014) Exp Astron 38:249
Reindl N, Bainbridge M , Przybilla N et al (2019) Mon Not R Astron Soc 482:L93
Ribas I, Guinan EF, Güdel M , Audard M (2005) Astrophys J 622:680
Ricker GR, Winn JN, Vanderspek R et al (2014) Space telescopes and instrumentation 2014: optical, infrared,
and millimeter wave. Oschmann J, Jacobus M , Clampin M , Fazio GG, MacEwen HA (eds) SPIE
conference series, vol 9143, p 914320
Ricker GR, Winn JN, Vanderspek R et al (2015) J Astron Telesc Instrum Syst 1:014003
Riley TE, Watts AL, Bogdanov S et al (2019) Astrophys J 887:L21
Rivinius T, Carciofi AC, Martayan C (2013) Astron Astrophys Rev 21:69
Ruciriski SM (1969) Acta Astron 19:245
Salmon SJAJ, Eggenberger P, Montalbán J et al (2022) Astron Astrophys 659:A142
Springer
Science with QUVIK Page 33 of 34 24
Sanchis-Ojeda R, Rappaport S, Winn JN et al (2014) Astrophys J 787:47
Sanchis-Ojeda R, Rappaport S, Palle E et al (2015) Astrophys J 812:112
Schmidtobreick L (2013) Cent Eur Astrophys Bull 37:361
Schneider FRN, Ohlmann ST, Podsiadlowski P et al (2020) Mon Not R Astron Soc 495:2796
Seager S, Mallén-Ornelas G (2003) Astrophys J 585:1038
Seli B, Vida K, Moór A, Pál A, Oláh K (2021) Astron Astrophys 650:A138
Selvelli P, Gilmozzi R (2013) Astron Astrophys 560:A49
Serenelli A, Weiss A, Aerts C et al (2021) Astron Astrophys Rev 29:4
Sheikina TA, Miroshnichenko AS, Corporon P (2000) The be phenomenon in early-type stars: IAU Colloq.
175. Smith M A , Henrichs HF, Fabregat J (eds) ASP conference series, vol 214, p 494
Shore SN (1990) IAU Circ 5005:1
Shvartzvald Y, Waxman E, Gal-Yam A et al (2023). E-prints, arXiv:2304.14482
Siegel M H , LaPorte SJ, Porterfield BL, Hagen LMZ, Gronwall C A (2019) Astron J 158:35
Smith M A (2001) Astrophys J 562:998
Smith N (2014) Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 52:487
Smith GH, Cochrane K M (2020) Astrophys Space Sci 365:95
Southworth J (2015) Living together: planets, host stars and binaries. Rucinski SM, Torres G, Zejda M (eds)
Astronomical society of the Pacific conference series, vol 496, p 164
Southworth J, Maxted PFL, Smalley B (2005) Astron Astrophys 429:645
Stecher TP (1965) Astrophys J 142:1683
Stencel RE, Carpenter KG, Hagen W (1986) Astrophys J 308:859
Sun M , Jiang B, Zhao H, Ren Y (2021) Astrophys J Suppl Ser 256:46
Sundqvist JO, Puls J, Feldmeier A (2010) Astron Astrophys 510:All
Šurlan B, Hamann W-R, Aret A et al (2013) Astron Astrophys 559:A130
Szabó G M , Pál A, Derekas A et al (2012) Mon Not R Astron Soc 421:L122
Tafoya D, Gómez Y, Rodriguez L F (2004) Astrophys J 610:827
Takata J, Cheng KS (2017) Astrophys J 834:4
Torres G, Andersen J, Giménez A (2010) Astron Astrophys Rev 18:67
Turner DG (1979) Publ Astron Soc Pac 91:642
van Buren D, McCray R (1988) Astrophys J 329:L93
Van Eylen V, Agentoft C, Lundkvist MS et al (2018) Mon Not R Astron Soc 479:4786
Vanderbosch Z, Hermes JJ, Dennihy E et al (2020) Astrophys J 897:171
Vanderburg A, Johnson JA, Rappaport S et al (2015) Nature 526:546
Vanderburg A, Rappaport SA, Xu S et al (2020) Nature 585:363
Varga J, Gerják T, Abraham P et al (2019) Mon Not R Astron Soc 485:3112
Vida K, Oláh K, Kováři Z et al (2019) Astrophys J 884:160
Vidotto A A (2020) In: Kosovichev A, Strassmeier S, Jardine M (eds) Solar and stellar magnetic fields: origins
and manifestations, vol 354, pp 259-267
Vučkovič M , Ostensen RH, Németh P, Bloemen S, Pápics PI (2016) Astron Astrophys 586:A146
Walker G, Matthews J, Kuschnig R et al (2003) Publ Astron Soc Pac 115:1023
Wang B, Han Z (2012) New Astron Rev 56:122
Weingartner JC, Draine BT (2001) Astrophys J 548:296
Weiss WW, Rucinski SM, Moffat AFJ et al (2014) Publ Astron Soc Pac 126:573
Weiss WW, Zwintz K, Kuschnig R et al (2021) Universe 7:199
Welsh BY, Wheatley J, Browne SE et al (2006) Astron Astrophys 458:921
Werner N, Řípa J, Thone C et al (2024) Space Sci Rev 220:11
White RL, Becker RH (1985) Bull Am Astron Soc 17:753
Wilson RE (1971) Astrophys J 170:529
Wilson OC (1978) Astrophys J 226:379
Wilson RE (1990) Astrophys J 356:613
Wolszczan A, Frail DA (1992) Nature 355:145
Wu Z, Ricigliano G, Kashyap R, Perego A, Radiče D (2022) Mon Not R Astron Soc 512:328
Xiao D, Wang F, Dai Z (2021) Sci China, Phys Mech Astron 64:249501
Xu S, Jura M , Dufour P, Zuckerman B (2016) Astrophys J 816:L22
Xu S, Hallakoun N, Gary B et al (2019) Astron J 157:255
Yao G-R, Huang L, Yu C, Shen Z-Q (2018) Astrophys J 854:10
Zajaček M , Czerny B, Jaiswal V K et al (2023). E-prints, arXiv:2306.15082
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
Springer
24 Page 34 of 34 J. Krtička etal.
Authors and Affiliations
Jiří Krtička1
• Jan Benáček2 , 3
• Jan Budaj4
• Daniela Korčáková5
• András Pál6
•
Martin Piecka7
• Miloslav Zejda1
• Volkan Baki§8
• Miroslav Brož5
•
Hsiang-Kuang Chang9
• Nikola Faltová1
• Rudolf Gális1 0
• Daniel Jadlovský1
•
Jan Janík1
- Jan Kára5
• Jakub Kolář1
- lva Krtičková1
• Jiří Kubát1 1
•
Brankica Kubátová1 1
• Petr Kurfürst1
• Matúš Labaj1
• Jaroslav Mere5
•
Zdeněk Mikulášek1
• Filip Münz1
• Ernst Paunzen1
• Michal Prišegen1 2 , 1
•
Tahereh Ramezani1
•Tatiana Rievajová1
- Jakub Řípa1
• Linda Schmidtobreick1 3
•
Marek Skarka1 , 1 1
• Gabriel Szász1
• Werner Weiss7
• Michal Zajaček1
• Norbert Werner1
[X] J. Krtička
krticka@physics.muni.cz
1
Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University,
Kotlářská 2, Brno, 611 37, Czech Republic
2
Institute for Physics and Astronomy, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24/25,
Potsdam, 14476, Germany
3
Centre for Physics and Astronomy, Technical University of Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, Berlin,
10623, Germany
4
Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Tatranská Lomnica, 05960, Slovak Republic
^ Astronomical Institute, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, V Holešovičkách
2, Praha, 180 00, Czech Republic
^ Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Konkoly Observatory, Konkoly-Thege M . út
15-17, Budapest, H-1121, Hungary
7
Department of Astrophysics, University of Vienna, Türkenschanzstraße 17, Vienna, 1180, Austria
Faculty of Science, Department of Space Sciences and Technologies, Akdeniz University, Antalya,
07058, Tiirkiye
9 Institute of Astronomy, National Tsing Hua University, 101 Sec. 2 Kuang-Fu Rd., Hsinchu,
300044, Taiwan, Republic of China
^ Institute of Physics, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University, Park Angelinum 9, Košice, 040 01,
Slovak Republic
1 1
Astronomical Institute, Czech Academy of Sciences, Fricova 298, Ondřejov, 251 65, Czech
Republic
1 2
Advanced Technologies Research Institute, Faculty of Materials Science and Technology in
Trnava, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bottova 25, Trnava, 917 24, Slovakia
1 3
European Southern Observatory (ESO), Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile
Springer