The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress Bernard de Fontenelle and His Contemporaries

ŠPELDA, Daniel. The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress Bernard de Fontenelle and His Contemporaries. 1st ed. Cham: Springer, 2024, 224 pp. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées (ARCH, volume 250). ISBN 978-3-031-60525-3. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60526-0.

Basic information

• Original name: The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress Bernard de Fontenelle and His Contemporaries
• Name in Czech: Původ myšlenky vědeckého pokroku. Bernard de Fontenelle a jeho současníci
• Name (in English): The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress Bernard de Fontenelle and His Contemporaries
• Authors: ŠPELDA, Daniel (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
• Edition: 1. vyd. Cham, 224 pp. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées (ARCH, volume 250), 2024.
• Publisher: Springer

Other information

• Original language: Czech
• Type of outcome: Book on a specialized topic
• Field of Study: 60301 Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
• Country of publisher: Czech Republic
• Confidentiality degree: is not subject to a state or trade secret
• Publication form: printed version "print"
• WWW: URL
• Organization unit: Faculty of Arts
• ISBN: 978-3-031-60525-3
• Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60526-0
• Keywords (in Czech): Bernard de Fontenelle; idea vědeckého pokroku; raně novověká epistemologie
• Keywords in English: Bernard de Fontenelle; the idea of scientific progress; early modern epistemology
• Tags: International impact, Reviewed

Abstract

This volume offers a new interpretation of the genesis of the idea of scientific progress in early modern science and philosophy. The interpretation argues that the idea of scientific progress was not a historical category, but an epistemological one. The main thesis of the book posits that the idea of scientific progress was a methodological means of dealing with the contingency of nature. To illustrate the novelty of the idea, the individual chapters compare several features of Renaissance natural philosophy with a new regime of knowledge that included time as an inevitable factor of empirical research. The temporal regime of knowledge is illustrated by the work of Bernard de Fontenelle and his colleagues at the Académie des sciences in Paris at the end of the 17th century. The new interpretation remedies a gap in recent scholarship where the idea of scientific progress has been overlooked even though the early modern natural philosophers themselves used it to describe the nature of their research. The book places both well-known texts and less-studied documents in a new light, thus contributing to the lively and rich debate on the origins and nature of early modern science and philosophy. It is of interest to scholars studying the history of early modern philosophy and science.

Abstract (in English)

This volume offers a new interpretation of the genesis of the idea of scientific progress in early modern science and philosophy. The interpretation argues that the idea of scientific progress was not a historical category, but an epistemological one. The main thesis of the book posits that the idea of scientific progress was a methodological means of dealing with the contingency of nature. To illustrate the novelty of the idea, the individual chapters compare several features of Renaissance natural philosophy with a new regime of knowledge that included time as an inevitable factor of empirical research. The temporal regime of knowledge is illustrated by the work of Bernard de Fontenelle and his colleagues at the Académie des sciences in Paris at the end of the 17th century. The new interpretation remedies a gap in recent scholarship where the idea of scientific progress has been overlooked even though the early modern natural philosophers themselves used it to describe the nature of their research. The book places both well-known texts and less-studied documents in a new light, thus contributing to the lively and rich debate on the origins and nature of early modern science and philosophy. It is of interest to scholars studying the history of early modern philosophy and science.

Links

• GA23-05587S, research and development project: Name: Filosofická legitimizace vědy v raném osvícenství: Fontenelle a jeho současníci

Investor: Czech Science Foundation, The Philosophical Legitimation of Science in the Early Enlightenment: Fontenelle and His Colleagues