HAPLA, Martin. Consequentialism and Problem of Role Morality in Legal Ethics. Legal Ethics. Routledge, 2024, vol. 26, No 2, p. 183-200. ISSN 1757-8450. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2024.2341348.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Consequentialism and Problem of Role Morality in Legal Ethics
Authors HAPLA, Martin (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Legal Ethics, Routledge, 2024, 1757-8450.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 50500 5.5 Law
Country of publisher United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 1.000 in 2022
Organization unit Faculty of Law
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2024.2341348
UT WoS 001204602700001
Keywords in English Common morality; Role morality; The role of a lawyer; Legal ethics; Legal philosophy; Consequentialism; Utilitarianism; Confidentiality
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: doc. JUDr. Martin Hapla, Ph.D., učo 257193. Changed: 1/7/2024 09:41.
Abstract
One of the frequent philosophical problems of legal ethics is the conflict between common and role morality. This situation is where a lawyer's actions are evaluated differently by these two sets of moral norms. The article seizes on this as a conflict between two conventional moralities that need to be resolved with the help of a justificatory morality and thus an appropriate theory of normative ethics. It offers as a possible response a variant of consequentialism that draws on utilitarianism and brings it closer to pragmatism. This approach seeks to preserve the traditional advantages of utilitarianism, which are minimalist and plausible normative assumptions, and an excellent ability to resolve moral conflicts. At the same time, it takes into account the complex nature of the world in which we live and our epistemic uncertainty, which brings it closer to pragmatism. The author confronts this theory with some existing approaches to resolving the conflict between the common and role morality and tries to show that it is at least as plausible as they are and should have a place among them. Finally, the article concludes with an analysis of the famous case of Alton Logan as its practical application.
Links
MUNI/A/1242/2022, interní kód MUName: Morální problémy právních profesí
Investor: Masaryk University, Moral Issues of Legal Professions
PrintDisplayed: 27/9/2024 21:07