KISS, Igor, Matyáš KUHN, K. HRUSAK and T. BUCHLER. Incidence of fatigue associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis. ESMO OPEN. AMSTERDAM: ELSEVIER, 2022, vol. 7, No 3, p. 1-7. ISSN 2059-7029. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100474.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Incidence of fatigue associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis
Authors KISS, Igor (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Matyáš KUHN (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), K. HRUSAK (203 Czech Republic) and T. BUCHLER (203 Czech Republic).
Edition ESMO OPEN, AMSTERDAM, ELSEVIER, 2022, 2059-7029.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30204 Oncology
Country of publisher United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 7.300
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100474
UT WoS 001044008800008
Keywords in English checkpoint inhibitors; fatigue; meta-analysis; chemotherapy; immunotherapy; targeted therapy
Tags 14110811, 14119612, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Changed: 11/7/2024 09:22.
Abstract
Background: Fatigue is one of the most common adverse effects associated with cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Because treatment-related fatigue also frequently occurs in patients treated with non-immunological therapies, our study aimed to compare the incidence of fatigue in CPI-treated patients with that associated with non-immune therapies in randomised trials. Methods: PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for phase III studies using a CPI alone or in combination with chemotherapy or non-immunologic targeted therapy in the experimental arm and control arm using inactive therapies such as placebo or observation, chemotherapy, or non-immunologic targeted therapy. Adverse events listed in the full texts as well as those available from clinicaltrials.gov were reviewed for all identified studies. Results: A total of 60 studies involving 41 435 patients were included in the analysis. All-grade fatigue was reported in 30.4% of patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 29.9% to 31.0%] in the immunotherapy arms of the analysed studies. Using anti-programmed cell death protein 1 agents as reference, the odds ratio (OR) for fatigue was significantly higher both for anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 agents (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.04-2.04) and the combination of anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and anti-programmed cell death protein agents (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.12-1.83). Fatigue was significantly less likely to occur in patients treated with CPI compared with patients receiving chemotherapy (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.85), but significantly was more common in patients receiving the combination of CPI/chemotherapy compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.22). Conclusions: Although immunotherapy using CPIs was associated with treatment-related fatigue, the occurrence of allgrade fatigue was significantly higher in patients treated with chemotherapy compared with patients receiving CPIs. The risk of fatigue was higher for CPI/chemotherapy combinations than for chemotherapy alone. These results suggest that although the effects of CPIs and chemotherapy are additive, chemotherapy was the dominant cause of treatment-related fatigue in the analysed trials.
PrintDisplayed: 18/7/2024 17:33