Detailed Information on Publication Record
2022
Incidence of fatigue associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis
KISS, Igor, Matyáš KUHN, K. HRUSAK and T. BUCHLERBasic information
Original name
Incidence of fatigue associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis
Authors
KISS, Igor (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Matyáš KUHN (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), K. HRUSAK (203 Czech Republic) and T. BUCHLER (203 Czech Republic)
Edition
ESMO OPEN, AMSTERDAM, ELSEVIER, 2022, 2059-7029
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30204 Oncology
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 7.300
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
001044008800008
Keywords in English
checkpoint inhibitors; fatigue; meta-analysis; chemotherapy; immunotherapy; targeted therapy
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 11/7/2024 09:22, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Background: Fatigue is one of the most common adverse effects associated with cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Because treatment-related fatigue also frequently occurs in patients treated with non-immunological therapies, our study aimed to compare the incidence of fatigue in CPI-treated patients with that associated with non-immune therapies in randomised trials. Methods: PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for phase III studies using a CPI alone or in combination with chemotherapy or non-immunologic targeted therapy in the experimental arm and control arm using inactive therapies such as placebo or observation, chemotherapy, or non-immunologic targeted therapy. Adverse events listed in the full texts as well as those available from clinicaltrials.gov were reviewed for all identified studies. Results: A total of 60 studies involving 41 435 patients were included in the analysis. All-grade fatigue was reported in 30.4% of patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 29.9% to 31.0%] in the immunotherapy arms of the analysed studies. Using anti-programmed cell death protein 1 agents as reference, the odds ratio (OR) for fatigue was significantly higher both for anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 agents (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.04-2.04) and the combination of anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and anti-programmed cell death protein agents (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.12-1.83). Fatigue was significantly less likely to occur in patients treated with CPI compared with patients receiving chemotherapy (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.85), but significantly was more common in patients receiving the combination of CPI/chemotherapy compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.22). Conclusions: Although immunotherapy using CPIs was associated with treatment-related fatigue, the occurrence of allgrade fatigue was significantly higher in patients treated with chemotherapy compared with patients receiving CPIs. The risk of fatigue was higher for CPI/chemotherapy combinations than for chemotherapy alone. These results suggest that although the effects of CPIs and chemotherapy are additive, chemotherapy was the dominant cause of treatment-related fatigue in the analysed trials.