HOPPE, Alexander, Michael HÜBNER, Sebastiaan PRINCEN and Martin ŠVEC. Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive. JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies. Hoboken: Wiley, 2024, vol. 2024, 24 July 2024, p. 1-20. ISSN 0021-9886. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13647. |
Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{2419859, author = {Hoppe, Alexander and Hübner, Michael and Princen, Sebastiaan and Švec, Martin}, article_location = {Hoboken}, article_number = {24 July 2024}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13647}, keywords = {Energy Law; Energy Efficiency; EU Law}, language = {eng}, issn = {0021-9886}, journal = {JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies}, title = {Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13647}, volume = {2024}, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR ID - 2419859 AU - Hoppe, Alexander - Hübner, Michael - Princen, Sebastiaan - Švec, Martin PY - 2024 TI - Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive JF - JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies VL - 2024 IS - 24 July 2024 SP - 1-20 EP - 1-20 PB - Wiley SN - 00219886 KW - Energy Law KW - Energy Efficiency KW - EU Law UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13647 N2 - In this article, we introduce an innovative theoretical framework to analyse the use of differentiated implementation in the implementation process of European Union (EU) Directives. We identify rationales for offering flexibility in EU Directives as well as motives for policy-makers to make use of the discretion. We analyse patterns and drivers of differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) in four member states in order to assess whether practices of differentiated implementation conform to the rationales for offering flexibility. We show that member states mainly use the flexibility offered to retain existing policies. In addition, the EED led to some mutual learning based on experimentation, although this effect is limited. Whilst the EED offered a high potential for mutual learning, the member states did not use this opportunity. Overall, the implementation of the EED offers mixed evidence for the use of differentiated implementation to support differentiation. ER -
HOPPE, Alexander, Michael HÜBNER, Sebastiaan PRINCEN and Martin ŠVEC. Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive. \textit{JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies}. Hoboken: Wiley, 2024, vol.~2024, 24 July 2024, p.~1-20. ISSN~0021-9886. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13647.
|