Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of
Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency
Directive

J 2024

Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive

HOPPE, Alexander; Michael HÜBNER; Sebastiaan PRINCEN and Martin ŠVEC

Basic information

Original name

Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive

Authors

HOPPE, Alexander; Michael HÜBNER; Sebastiaan PRINCEN and Martin ŠVEC (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)

Edition

JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies, Hoboken, Wiley, 2024, 0021-9886

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Article in a journal

Field of Study

50501 Law

Country of publisher

United States of America

Confidentiality degree

is not subject to a state or trade secret

References:

Open access článku

Impact factor

Impact factor: 3.100 in 2023

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14220/24:00136595

Organization unit

Faculty of Law

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13647

UT WoS

001274742100001

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-105001726990

Keywords (in Czech)

Energetika; Energetická účinnost; právo EU

Keywords in English

Energy Law; Energy Efficiency; EU Law

Abstract

V originále

In this article, we introduce an innovative theoretical framework to analyse the use of differentiated implementation in the implementation process of European Union (EU) Directives. We identify rationales for offering flexibility in EU Directives as well as motives for policy-makers to make use of the discretion. We analyse patterns and drivers of differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) in four member states in order to assess whether practices of differentiated implementation conform to the rationales for offering flexibility. We show that member states mainly use the flexibility offered to retain existing policies. In addition, the EED led to some mutual learning based on experimentation, although this effect is limited. Whilst the EED offered a high potential for mutual learning, the member states did not use this opportunity. Overall, the implementation of the EED offers mixed evidence for the use of differentiated implementation to support differentiation.

Cite

HOPPE, Alexander; Michael HÜBNER; Sebastiaan PRINCEN and Martin ŠVEC. Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive. JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies. Hoboken: Wiley, 2024, vol. 63, No 3, p. 745-764. ISSN 0021-9886. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13647.

@article{2419859,
   author = {Hoppe, Alexander and Hübner, Michael and Princen, Sebastiaan and Švec, Martin},
   article_location = {Hoboken},
   article_number = {3},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13647},
   keywords = {Energy Law; Energy Efficiency; EU Law},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0021-9886},
   journal = {JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies},
   title = {Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive},
   url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13647},
   volume = {63},
   year = {2024}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2419859
AU  - Hoppe, Alexander - Hübner, Michael - Princen, Sebastiaan - Švec, Martin
PY  - 2024
TI  - Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive
JF  - JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies
VL  - 63
IS  - 3
SP  - 745-764
EP  - 745-764
PB  - Wiley
SN  - 00219886
KW  - Energy Law
KW  - Energy Efficiency
KW  - EU Law
UR  - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13647
N2  - In this article, we introduce an innovative theoretical framework to analyse the use of differentiated implementation in the implementation process of European Union (EU) Directives. We identify rationales for offering flexibility in EU Directives as well as motives for policy-makers to make use of the discretion. We analyse patterns and drivers of differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) in four member states in order to assess whether practices of differentiated implementation conform to the rationales for offering flexibility. We show that member states mainly use the flexibility offered to retain existing policies. In addition, the EED led to some mutual learning based on experimentation, although this effect is limited. Whilst the EED offered a high potential for mutual learning, the member states did not use this opportunity. Overall, the implementation of the EED offers mixed evidence for the use of differentiated implementation to support differentiation.
ER  -

HOPPE, Alexander; Michael HÜBNER; Sebastiaan PRINCEN and Martin ŠVEC. Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive. \textit{JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies}. Hoboken: Wiley, 2024, vol.~63, No~3, p.~745-764. ISSN~0021-9886. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13647.

Přehled o publikaci