J 2024

Evaluation of the i-gel® Plus supraglottic airway device in elective surgery: a prospective international multicentre study

WERNER, Jakub, Olga KLEMENTOVA, Jan BRUTHANS, Jaromir MACOUN, Tomasz GASZYNSKI et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Evaluation of the i-gel® Plus supraglottic airway device in elective surgery: a prospective international multicentre study

Authors

WERNER, Jakub, Olga KLEMENTOVA, Jan BRUTHANS, Jaromir MACOUN, Tomasz GASZYNSKI, Tomas HENLIN, Will DONALDSON, Erik LICHNOVSKY, Shiva ARAVA, Ana M LOPEZ, Raquel BERGE and Pavel MICHALEK

Edition

ANAESTHESIA, HOBOKEN, WILEY, 2024, 0003-2409

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30223 Anaesthesiology

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Impact factor

Impact factor: 10.700 in 2022

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

UT WoS

001285421200001

Keywords in English

elective surgery; i-gel (R) Plus; oropharyngeal seal pressure; supraglottic airway device

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 20/8/2024 10:48, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Abstract

V originále

Background The i-gel (R) Plus is a modified version of the i-gel (R) supraglottic airway device. It contains a wider drainage port; a longer tip; ramps inside the breathing channel; and an additional port for oxygen delivery. There has been no prospective evaluation of this device in clinical practice. Methods This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the performance of the i-gel Plus in adult patients undergoing elective procedures under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was overall insertion success rate, defined as the ability to provide effective airway management through the device from insertion until the end of the surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included device performance and incidence of postoperative adverse events. Data from the first 1000 patients are reported. Results In total, 1012 patients were enrolled; 12 forms were excluded from the final analysis due to incomplete data leaving 1000 included patients (545 female). Overall insertion success rate was 98.6%, with a first-attempt success rate of insertion of 88.2%. A significant difference between females and males was seen for the overall success rate (97.4% vs. 99.6% respectively) but not for first-attempt successful insertion. Mean (SD) oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH(2)O. The only independent factor that increased the risk of first-attempt failure was low operator experience. Complications included desaturation < 85% in 0.6%; traces of blood on the device in 7.4%; laryngospasm in 0.5%; and gastric contents inside the bowl in 0.2% of patients. Conclusions The i-gel Plus appears to be an effective supraglottic airway device that is associated with a high insertion success rate and a reasonably low incidence of complications.