Detailed Information on Publication Record
2024
Evaluation of the i-gel® Plus supraglottic airway device in elective surgery: a prospective international multicentre study
WERNER, Jakub, Olga KLEMENTOVA, Jan BRUTHANS, Jaromir MACOUN, Tomasz GASZYNSKI et. al.Basic information
Original name
Evaluation of the i-gel® Plus supraglottic airway device in elective surgery: a prospective international multicentre study
Authors
WERNER, Jakub, Olga KLEMENTOVA, Jan BRUTHANS, Jaromir MACOUN, Tomasz GASZYNSKI, Tomas HENLIN, Will DONALDSON, Erik LICHNOVSKY, Shiva ARAVA, Ana M LOPEZ, Raquel BERGE and Pavel MICHALEK
Edition
ANAESTHESIA, HOBOKEN, WILEY, 2024, 0003-2409
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30223 Anaesthesiology
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 10.700 in 2022
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
001285421200001
Keywords in English
elective surgery; i-gel (R) Plus; oropharyngeal seal pressure; supraglottic airway device
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 20/8/2024 10:48, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Background The i-gel (R) Plus is a modified version of the i-gel (R) supraglottic airway device. It contains a wider drainage port; a longer tip; ramps inside the breathing channel; and an additional port for oxygen delivery. There has been no prospective evaluation of this device in clinical practice. Methods This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the performance of the i-gel Plus in adult patients undergoing elective procedures under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was overall insertion success rate, defined as the ability to provide effective airway management through the device from insertion until the end of the surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included device performance and incidence of postoperative adverse events. Data from the first 1000 patients are reported. Results In total, 1012 patients were enrolled; 12 forms were excluded from the final analysis due to incomplete data leaving 1000 included patients (545 female). Overall insertion success rate was 98.6%, with a first-attempt success rate of insertion of 88.2%. A significant difference between females and males was seen for the overall success rate (97.4% vs. 99.6% respectively) but not for first-attempt successful insertion. Mean (SD) oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH(2)O. The only independent factor that increased the risk of first-attempt failure was low operator experience. Complications included desaturation < 85% in 0.6%; traces of blood on the device in 7.4%; laryngospasm in 0.5%; and gastric contents inside the bowl in 0.2% of patients. Conclusions The i-gel Plus appears to be an effective supraglottic airway device that is associated with a high insertion success rate and a reasonably low incidence of complications.