2025
Machines for Living: Architects’ Houses in the Czech Lands 1890–1939 – Case Study of Vladimír Karfík’s Zlín House (1935)
JANÁČ, PetrZákladní údaje
Originální název
Machines for Living: Architects’ Houses in the Czech Lands 1890–1939 – Case Study of Vladimír Karfík’s Zlín House (1935)
Název česky
Stroje na bydlení: Vlastní domy architektů v českých zemích mezi lety 1890-1939 - případová studie domu Vladimíra Karfíka ve Zlíně (1935)
Autoři
JANÁČ, Petr
Vydání
Courtauld Institute of Art, University of London, 2025
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Vyžádané přednášky
Obor
60401 Arts, Art history
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova česky
moderní architektura; česká architektura; funkcionalismus; avantgarda
Klíčová slova anglicky
modern architecture; Czech architecture; functionalism; avant guarde
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam
Změněno: 24. 6. 2025 00:16, Mgr. Ing. arch. Petr Janáč
Anotace
V originále
This presentation introduced my doctoral research on architects’ houses in the Czech lands between 1890 and 1939, focusing on their function as spaces of self-representation, experimentation, and ideological positioning. These houses, unconstrained by client demands, offered architects an opportunity to express personal architectural visions and respond to the broader cultural and political contexts of their time. After outlining the development of modern architecture in Central Europe, the second part of the talk focused on a detailed case study of the house of Vladimír Karfík, built in 1935 in Zlín. As chief architect for the Baťa company, Karfík operated within the constraints of a rationalized and standardized construction system. Yet his own house reveals significant departures from corporate norms, incorporating architectural elements linked to his international experience—particularly his work with Le Corbusier and Frank Lloyd Wright. The house combines features such as sash windows, a corner window, and a covered porch with rationalist spatial planning and prefabricated construction. As such, it offers a unique perspective on the transfer and adaptation of architectural ideas across contexts and highlights the tension between industrial standardization and individual expression within interwar modernism.