Detailed Information on Publication Record
2002
Context-dependence of diagnostic species: A case study of the Central European spruce forests
CHYTRÝ, Milan, Andreas EXNER, Richard HRIVNÁK, Karol UJHÁZY, Milan VALACHOVIČ et. al.Basic information
Original name
Context-dependence of diagnostic species: A case study of the Central European spruce forests
Authors
CHYTRÝ, Milan (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), Andreas EXNER (40 Austria), Richard HRIVNÁK (703 Slovakia), Karol UJHÁZY (703 Slovakia), Milan VALACHOVIČ (703 Slovakia) and Wolfgang WILLNER (40 Austria)
Edition
Folia Geobotanica, Pruhonice, Institute of Botany, 2002, 1211-9520
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
10600 1.6 Biological sciences
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14310/02:00007498
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
UT WoS
000182228800003
Keywords in English
Bohemian Massif; Eastern Alps; Fidelity; Phytosociological database; Picea abies; Vegetation survey; Western Carpathians
Tags
Změněno: 19/8/2003 09:48, prof. RNDr. Milan Chytrý, Ph.D.
Abstract
V originále
Diagnostic species of spruce forests were determined from a data set of 20,164 phytosociological relevés of forests from the Eastern Alps, Western Carpathians, and the Bohemian Massif, which included 3,569 relevés of spruce forests. Phi coefficient of association was used to measure species fidelity, and species with the highest fidelities were considered as diagnostic. Diagnostic species were determined in three ways, including (1) comparison of spruce forests among the three mountain ranges, (2) comparison between spruce forests and the other forests, performed separately in each of the mountain ranges, (3) simultaneous comparison of spruce forests of each of the mountain ranges with the spruce forests of the other two ranges and with the other forests of all ranges. The first case simulated phytosociological studies which focus on a limited range of habitats but have a wider geographical extent. The second case simulated studies done locally but in a broader range of different habitats. The third case is superior to the former two, but it can be rarely realized due to the lack of data. The sets of diagnostic species of spruce forests yielded in the first and second case were sharply different; the set resulting from the third case was a compromise between the former two. In the first case, spruce forests of the Eastern Alps had a number of diagnostic species, while the spruce forests of the other two mountain ranges were poorly characterized in these terms. In the second case, on the contrary, the quality of diagnostic species decreased from the Bohemian Massif to the Eastern Alps. This exercise points out that many lists of diagnostic species published in phytosociological literature have an equivocal meaning: unless we know what community types were compared prior to the determination of the diagnostic species, we can hardly use these lists for identification of community types.
Links
GA206/99/1523, research and development project |
| ||
MSM 143100010, plan (intention) |
|