Detailed Information on Publication Record
2003
Proměny dánské politiky
KOPEČEK, LubomírBasic information
Original name
Proměny dánské politiky
Name (in English)
Developments in Danish Politics
Authors
KOPEČEK, Lubomír (203 Czech Republic, guarantor)
Edition
Politologický časopis, Brno, Mezinárodní politologický ústavy, 2003, 1211-3247
Other information
Language
Czech
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50601 Political science
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14230/03:00030549
Organization unit
Faculty of Social Studies
Keywords in English
Denmark; elections; party system; parties; politics; cleavages
Tags
Reviewed
Změněno: 13/6/2008 13:58, prof. PhDr. Lubomír Kopeček, Ph.D.
V originále
Článek analyzuje dánskou politiku v průběhu 20. století (zejména strany a volby).
In English
This article analyses the evolution of party system and parties in Denmark during 20th century. Special attention is concentrated on the phenomena of freezing and unfreezing of party system between 1920s and 1960s. However, unfreezing of the party system, which was demonstrated by election 1973, led to the explosive and massive increasing of number of parties, the system (type) change was temporary. Is it true that format of the limited pluralism was transformed to the extreme pluralism. But the type of the party system came back to the earlier moderate pluralism in 1980s. Similarly as in the other Western European countries, the organisation of Danish political parties has changed: from the mass parties with close linkage to some social class and with joining to interests groups (the best example was the social democratic party and trade unions), to more open formation with the catch-all features. A look of the party system was influenced by the new political issues as well. The special importance had the membership in the European Community, immigration issue, postmaterialistic values, reform of the welfare state (and progressive tax) and revitalisation of the church-state division. However, the traditional right-left axis keeps its significance.