PANOVSKÝ, Roman, Jaroslav MELUZÍN, Vladimír KINCL, Blanka FISCHEROVÁ, František ŠTĚTKA a Kristýna SOMERLÍKOVÁ. Comparison of acoustic densitometry and dobutamine echocardiography in the assessment of myocardial viability. European Journal of Echocardiography. Great Britain: Elsevier, roč. 5, Suppl 1, s. S85, 1 s. ISSN 1525-2167. 2004.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Comparison of acoustic densitometry and dobutamine echocardiography in the assessment of myocardial viability
Název česky Srovnání akustické denzitometrie a dobutaminové echokardiografie v diagnostice viability myokardu
Autoři PANOVSKÝ, Roman (203 Česká republika, garant), Jaroslav MELUZÍN (203 Česká republika), Vladimír KINCL (203 Česká republika), Blanka FISCHEROVÁ (203 Česká republika), František ŠTĚTKA (203 Česká republika) a Kristýna SOMERLÍKOVÁ (203 Česká republika).
Vydání European Journal of Echocardiography, Great Britain, Elsevier, 2004, 1525-2167.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Stát vydavatele Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14110/04:00010682
Organizační jednotka Lékařská fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky acoustic densitometry; viability; coronary artery disease
Štítky acoustic densitometry, coronary artery disease, viability
Změnil Změnil: doc. MUDr. Roman Panovský, Ph.D., učo 24033. Změněno: 12. 5. 2005 14:10.
Anotace
Aim: The purpose of this study has been to compare acoustic densitometry and dobutamine echocardiography for an assessment of myocardial viability. Methods: Fifty-four patients with coronary artery disease and dysfunctional myocardial segments, who were referred for myocardial revascularization, underwent a viability assessment using acoustic densitometry. Thirty-four patients underwent also low-dose dobutamine echocardiography. Amplitude of cyclic variation of integrated backscatter (CVIB) was evaluated from each dysfunctional segment. The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was applied to determine the optimal cut off value of CVIB for distinction between viable and nonviable dysfunctional myocardium. Results of the two techniques were compared to follow-up resting echocardiography, which was performed at a mean of 3 months after successful revascularization in order to assess the recovery of function in revascularized, initially dysfunctional segments. Echocardiography was performed in standard views using 16-segment model of the left ventricle. Viable myocardium was identified by the augmentation of systolic thickening of an abnormal segment by at least one grade during dobutamine infusion or by the value of the maximal amplitude of cyclic variation of integrated backscatter (CVIB). Results: Acoustic densitometry had the sensitivity and specificity to predict functional recovery 90% and 77%, respectively. Dobutamine echocardiography had the sensitivity and specificity to predict contractile reserve 83% and 81%, respectively. The results were statistically comparable. Concordance between these methods was 80%. Conclusion: Acoustic densitometry and dobutamine echocardiography have comparable sensitivities and specificities for the prediction of functional recovery after coronary revascularization.
Anotace česky
Akustická denzitometrie má v předpovědi funkčního zlepšení regionální systolické funkce levé komory statisticky srovnatelné výsledky s dobutaminovou echokardiografií.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 18. 4. 2024 04:10