DOČEKAL, Mojmír. Několik poznámek k článku Reflexivity (Some remarks on Reflexivity). In Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty BU A 51. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2003, p. 179-189, 10 pp. ISBN 80-210-3151-4.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Několik poznámek k článku Reflexivity
Name (in English) Some remarks on Reflexivity
Authors DOČEKAL, Mojmír (203 Czech Republic, guarantor).
Edition Brno, Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty BU A 51, p. 179-189, 10 pp. 2003.
Publisher Masarykova univerzita
Other information
Original language Czech
Type of outcome Proceedings paper
Field of Study 60200 6.2 Languages and Literature
Country of publisher Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Organization unit Faculty of Arts
ISBN 80-210-3151-4
Keywords in English binding theory; argument structure
Tags argument structure, binding theory
Changed by Changed by: doc. PhDr. Mojmír Dočekal, Ph.D., učo 15952. Changed: 18/6/2008 14:50.
Abstract
V tomto článku zkoumám anaforické závislosti. Hlavním bodem je srovnání tzv. Reflexivity theory, která staví na argumentové struktuře, s klasickou teorií vázání.
Abstract (in English)
The present note asks the old question: what is the nature of anaphor? Can this question be answered from purely morphological ground (classical BT) or the answer lies somewhere deep in the argument structure (Reflexivity (Reinhard & Reuland))? The evidence from Czech seems to point at more classical solution (at least for Czech language).
PrintDisplayed: 29/7/2024 02:28