| FRIML, J., P. BENFEY, E. BENKOVÁ, M. BENNET, T. BERLETH, N. GELDNER, M. GREBE, M. HEISLER, J. HEJÁTKO, G. JURGENS, T. LAUX, K. LINDSEY, W. LUKOWITZ, C. LUSCHNIG, R. OFFRINGA, B. SCHERES, R. SWARUP, R. TORRES-RUIZ, D. WEIJERS and E. ZAŽÍMALOVÁ. Apical-basal polarity: why plant cells dont standon their heads. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, vol. 11, No 1, p. 12-14. ISSN 1360-1385. |
Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{630651,
author = {Friml, J. and Benfey, P. and Benková, E. and Bennet, M. and Berleth, T. and Geldner, N. and Grebe, M. and Heisler, M. and Hejátko, J. and Jurgens, G. and Laux, T. and Lindsey, K. and Lukowitz, W. and Luschnig, C. and Offringa, R. and Scheres, B. and Swarup, R. and TorresandRuiz, R. and Weijers, D. and Zažímalová, E.},
article_number = {1},
keywords = {apical-basal polarity; plant cell; apical; basal; upper; lower},
language = {eng},
issn = {1360-1385},
journal = {Trends Plant Sci.},
title = {Apical-basal polarity: why plant cells dont standon their heads},
volume = {11},
year = {2006}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 630651
AU - Friml, J. - Benfey, P. - Benková, E. - Bennet, M. - Berleth, T. - Geldner, N. - Grebe, M. - Heisler, M. - Hejátko, J. - Jurgens, G. - Laux, T. - Lindsey, K. - Lukowitz, W. - Luschnig, C. - Offringa, R. - Scheres, B. - Swarup, R. - Torres-Ruiz, R. - Weijers, D. - Zažímalová, E.
PY - 2006
TI - Apical-basal polarity: why plant cells dont standon their heads
JF - Trends Plant Sci.
VL - 11
IS - 1
SP - 12-14
EP - 12-14
SN - 13601385
KW - apical-basal polarity
KW - plant cell
KW - apical
KW - basal
KW - upper
KW - lower
N2 - The anatomical terminology that is used to describe the orientation and polarity in the plant body (for distinction indicated here in italics) is based on the consensus agreement that the transition zone between the aerial and the soil-borne part (the rootshoot junction) is defined as the base of the plant, and the ends of a body axis root and shoot tips are defined as apices. For embryos, another terminology is equally well established (indicated here by underlining), which defines the root embryo pole as the base and its opposite end as the apex. Over the past few years, studies dealing with issues of cellular polarity in plants have used either anatomical or embryological terminology to describe the upper and lower side of individual cells. Recently, this confusion in terminology was highlighted, and it was proposed that the anatomical terminology should be used in all cases. However, we believe that the anatomical terminology, when used for the description of cellular polarity, has important deficiencies. Here, based on a number of arguments, we propose what we consider to be a suitable compromise.
ER -
FRIML, J., P. BENFEY, E. BENKOVÁ, M. BENNET, T. BERLETH, N. GELDNER, M. GREBE, M. HEISLER, J. HEJÁTKO, G. JURGENS, T. LAUX, K. LINDSEY, W. LUKOWITZ, C. LUSCHNIG, R. OFFRINGA, B. SCHERES, R. SWARUP, R. TORRES-RUIZ, D. WEIJERS and E. ZAŽÍMALOVÁ. Apical-basal polarity: why plant cells dont standon their heads. \textit{Trends Plant Sci.}. 2006, vol.~11, No~1, p.~12-14. ISSN~1360-1385.
|
