Detailed Information on Publication Record
2006
Sociologický výskum antisemitizmu na Slovensku po roku 1989 v kritickej perspektíve
VAŠEČKA, MichalBasic information
Original name
Sociologický výskum antisemitizmu na Slovensku po roku 1989 v kritickej perspektíve
Name in Czech
Sociologický výzkum antisemitizmu na Slovensku po roce 1989 v kritické perspektivě
Name (in English)
Sociological research of the antisemitism in Slovakia after 1989 in a critical perspective
Authors
VAŠEČKA, Michal (703 Slovakia, guarantor)
Edition
Sociológia, Bratislava, Slovenská akadémia vied, 2006, 0049-1225
Other information
Language
Slovak
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50000 5. Social Sciences
Country of publisher
Slovakia
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 0.186
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14230/06:00017432
Organization unit
Faculty of Social Studies
UT WoS
000240179300001
Keywords (in Czech)
Antisemitizmus; kvalitativní a kvantitatvní výzkum; výzkumné metody; sociální distance; veřejné mínění; de-judaizovaná perspektiva; socio-psychologické faktory; kritická analýza.
Keywords in English
Antisemitism; qualitative and quantitative research; research methods; social distance; public opinion; de-judaized perspective; socio-psychological factors; critical analysis.
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 30/6/2009 17:44, PhDr. Michal Vašečka, Ph.D.
V originále
Article critically analyses approaches that Slovak sociologists have been using in their analysis of antisemitism in Slovakia after 1989. The article describes quantitative methods used by Slovak sociologists and suggests need of a complex approach to research of antisemitism. Author argues that modern antisemitism is de-judaized, while Slovak researchers focus more on a research of prejudices and stereotypes toward Jews. The research of antisemitism in Slovakia is fully dominated by a Bogarduss scale of social distance while different relevant research methods are not used by Slovak experts. Moreover, in the process of interpretations of public opinion surveys experts do not take into account the so-called escaping answers of respondents and attempts to run away from answering sensitive questions. Socio-psychological research, reflecting authoritarian personality, anomy, alienation and ontological insecurity of common people as sources of anti-Semitism, is rather rare in Slovakia. Consequently, quantitative research of antisemitism in Slovakia can be evaluated as insufficient. De-judaized perspective of anti-Semitism and even of Jews themselves in a Sartre s sense is remaining one of the greatest challenges for sociologists researching antisemitism in Slovakia.
In Czech
Article critically analyses approaches that Slovak sociologists have been using in their analysis of antisemitism in Slovakia after 1989. The article describes quantitative methods used by Slovak sociologists and suggests need of a complex approach to research of antisemitism. Author argues that modern antisemitism is de-judaized, while Slovak researchers focus more on a research of prejudices and stereotypes toward Jews. The research of antisemitism in Slovakia is fully dominated by a Bogarduss scale of social distance while different relevant research methods are not used by Slovak experts. Moreover, in the process of interpretations of public opinion surveys experts do not take into account the so-called escaping answers of respondents and attempts to run away from answering sensitive questions. Socio-psychological research, reflecting authoritarian personality, anomy, alienation and ontological insecurity of common people as sources of anti-Semitism, is rather rare in Slovakia. Consequently, quantitative research of antisemitism in Slovakia can be evaluated as insufficient. De-judaized perspective of anti-Semitism and even of Jews themselves in a Sartre s sense is remaining one of the greatest challenges for sociologists researching antisemitism in Slovakia.
In English
Article critically analyses approaches that Slovak sociologists have been using in their analysis of antisemitism in Slovakia after 1989. The article describes quantitative methods used by Slovak sociologists and suggests need of a complex approach to research of antisemitism. Author argues that modern antisemitism is de-judaized, while Slovak researchers focus more on a research of prejudices and stereotypes toward Jews. The research of antisemitism in Slovakia is fully dominated by a Bogarduss scale of social distance while different relevant research methods are not used by Slovak experts. Moreover, in the process of interpretations of public opinion surveys experts do not take into account the so-called escaping answers of respondents and attempts to run away from answering sensitive questions. Socio-psychological research, reflecting authoritarian personality, anomy, alienation and ontological insecurity of common people as sources of anti-Semitism, is rather rare in Slovakia. Consequently, quantitative research of antisemitism in Slovakia can be evaluated as insufficient. De-judaized perspective of anti-Semitism and even of Jews themselves in a Sartre s sense is remaining one of the greatest challenges for sociologists researching antisemitism in Slovakia.
Links
| MSM0021622408, plan (intention) |
|