Mluvenost a psanost jako slohotvorné činitele

KRČMOVÁ, Marie. Mluvenost a psanost jako slohotvorné činitele (Spoken and Written Language as Stylistic Factors). In Sborník prací Filozoficko-přírodovědecké fakulty Slezské univerzity v Opavě, D3. 1st ed. Opava: Slezská univerzita v Opavě, 2003, p. 29-35. ISBN 80-7248-188-6.

Basic information

• Original name: Mluvenost a psanost jako slohotvorné činitele
• Name (in English): Spoken and Written Language as Stylistic Factors
• Authors: KRČMOVÁ, Marie (203 Czech Republic, guarantor).
• Edition: 1. vyd. Opava, Sborník prací Filozoficko-přírodovědecké fakulty Slezské univerzity v Opavě, D3, p. 29-35, 7 pp. 2003.
• Publisher: Slezská univerzita v Opavě

Other information

• Original language: Czech
• Type of outcome: Proceedings paper
• Field of Study: 60200 6.2 Languages and Literature
• Country of publisher: Czech Republic
• Confidentiality degree: is not subject to a state or trade secret
• RIV identification code: RIV/00216224:14210/03:00020093
• Organization unit: Faculty of Arts
• ISBN: 80-7248-188-6
• Keywords in English: spoken language; written language; stylistic factors; czech stylistics
• Tags: czech stylistics, spoken language, stylistic factors, written language
• Tags: Reviewed

Abstract

Studie se zabývá vztahem mezi mluveností a psaností, jež jsou tradičně chápány jako objektivní slohotvorné činitele. Ukazuje, že jde o opozici, která je jiného charakteru. Nejde totiž pouze o realizační formy s různými možnostmi, ale i o rozdíl při osvojování, produkci a percepci, ve vztahu ke spisovnému jazyku, komunikační situaci atd.

Abstract (in English)

The article shows that the difference between written and spoken language is not caused just by the code in which the communication occurs, it has deeper roots: it is caused by the process of learning the language itself. While the spoken norm of the first language (the mother tongue) is learned by the natural process and in contact with the whole national language, the written norm is learned by a controlled didactic process and it is bound to the standard language. Also the perception of the written language differs from the perception of spoken language not only by the means of writing and hearing, but also in the mode of perception and the range of passages possible to perceive and interpret at once. The style of the communication is, sometimes unconsciously, influenced by all these factors. That is why the author thinks that the choice of the code, i.e. the decision whether the spoken or the written language will be used, is not really a stylistic factor comparable with other factors which influence the style of the text.

Links

• GA405/02/0349, research and development project: Name: Kontrastivní studium věcných textů

Investor: Czech Science Foundation, A contrastive study of non-fiction (expository) texts