BALÍK, Stanislav and Jan HOLZER. Focus on elections: Remarks on the Contemporary Methodology for Classifying Non-Democratic Regimes. Evropská volební studia. Brno: ISPO FSS MU, 2007, vol. 2, No 1, p. 1-29. ISSN 1801-6545.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Focus on elections: Remarks on the Contemporary Methodology for Classifying Non-Democratic Regimes
Name in Czech Zaměřeno na volby: poznámky k soudobé metodologii klasifikace nedemokratických režimů
Authors BALÍK, Stanislav (203 Czech Republic, guarantor) and Jan HOLZER (203 Czech Republic).
Edition Evropská volební studia, Brno, ISPO FSS MU, 2007, 1801-6545.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 50601 Political science
Country of publisher Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14230/07:00020176
Organization unit Faculty of Social Studies
Keywords in English Theory of non-democratic regimes; democracy; authoritarian regime
Tags ambiguous regimes, authoritarian regime, competitive authoritarianism, democracy, electoral authoritarianism, electoral democracy, hegemonic authoritarianism, liberal democracy, minimum criteria for democracy, pseudodemocracy, theory of hybrid regimes, Theory of Non-Democratic Regimes
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: prof. PhDr. Stanislav Balík, Ph.D., učo 12180. Changed: 2/3/2010 18:28.
Abstract
This article describes and analyses current trends in classifying non-democratic regimes. A brief overview of the basic typologies (J. J. Linz, S. P. Huntington, W. Merkel) is given first. The article then focuses on the methodology currently used for classifying non-democratic regimes, one which is connected to a significant degree with the theory of so-called hybrid regimes. Placing a strong emphasis on the texts of L. Diamond, A. Schedler, S. Levitsky and L. A. Way, the authors attempt to illustrate the methodological consequences the application of this theory has for the relevant area of political science. The authors particularly concentrate on the exclusive role of the elections as a variable of classification, or, respectively, on the concept of elections as a criterion applied in a continuum between electoral democracies at the one end, and competitive authoritarianisms at the other. This paper provides a critical reflection on this approach and points out its methodological limits. According to the authors, elections can be used to discriminate between democracies and non-democracies, however, within the category of the nondemocratic regime one needs to apply a different set of criteria in order to be able to discriminate further.
Abstract (in Czech)
Článek popisuje a analyzuje současné trendy v klasifikaci nedemokratických režimů. Nejprve podává stručný přehled základních typologií (J. J. Linz, S. P. Huntington, W. Merkel). Dále se zaměřuje na v současnosti užívanou metodologii klasifikace nedemokratických režimů, jež je významně spojena s teorií tzv. hybridních režimů. S velkým důrazem na texty L. Diamonda, A. Schedlera, S. Levitskeho a L. A. Waye autoři ilustrují metodologické konsekvence, jež má aplikace této teorie na významnou oblast politické vědy. Autoři se rovněž zaměřují na exkluzivní roli voleb, jakožto proměnné pro klasifikaci, resp. na koncept voleb jakožto kritéria pro určení místa režimu na ose vymezené volebními demokraciemi na straně jedné a soutěživým autoritarismem na straně druhé. Podle autorů mohou být volby používány pro rozlišení demokracií a nedemokracií, ale uvnitř kategorie nedemokratických režimů musí být užíváno kritérií jiných.
Links
GA407/04/0331, research and development projectName: Nedemokratické politické systémy v postkomunistickém areálu
Investor: Czech Science Foundation, Non-Democratic Political Systems in Post-Communist Area
PrintDisplayed: 13/6/2024 15:21