Detailed Information on Publication Record
2007
Wetlands succession in Ruda Nature Reserve, Czech Republic
NAVRÁTIL, Josef and Jana NAVRÁTILOVÁBasic information
Original name
Wetlands succession in Ruda Nature Reserve, Czech Republic
Name in Czech
Sukcese mokřadní vegetace v NPR Ruda, Česká Republika
Authors
NAVRÁTIL, Josef (203 Czech Republic) and Jana NAVRÁTILOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
1. vyd. London, Okruszko S. T., Maltby E., Szatyłowicz J., Świątek D. & Kotowski W. (eds): Wetlands: Monitoring, Modelling, Management. p. 27-36, 10 pp. 2007
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Group
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Stať ve sborníku
Field of Study
10600 1.6 Biological sciences
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Publication form
printed version "print"
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14310/07:00057163
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
ISBN
978-0-415-40820-2
UT WoS
000252067700005
Keywords in English
vegetation; wetlands; monitoring; changes; succession
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 12/4/2013 12:52, Ing. Andrea Mikešková
V originále
Changes of vegetation between 1984 and 2004 were studied in Central-European fen (Natural Reserve Ruda). Two different methods usually used for monitoring vegetation changes were compared (i) repeating vegetation sampling and (ii) comparing vegetation maps using GIS. The results of both methods show succesional changes to more dense vegetation types. The difference between these two methods is in scale. The first method gives more detailed information about species composition, but it can miss changes in spatial composition of vegetation. In this case the second method is useful.
In Czech
Changes of vegetation between 1984 and 2004 were studied in Central-European fen (Natural Reserve Ruda). Two different methods usually used for monitoring vegetation changes were compared(i) repeating vegetation sampling and (ii) comparing vegetation maps using GIS. The results of both methods show succesional changes to more dense vegetation types. The difference between these two methods is in scale. The first method gives more detailed information about species composition, but it can miss changes in spatial composition of vegetation. In this case the second method is useful.
Links
| GD524/05/H536, research and development project |
| ||
| MSM0021622416, plan (intention) |
|