NAVRÁTIL, Josef and Jana NAVRÁTILOVÁ. Wetlands succession in Ruda Nature Reserve, Czech Republic. In Okruszko S. T., Maltby E., Szatyłowicz J., Świątek D. & Kotowski W. Okruszko S. T., Maltby E., Szatyłowicz J., Świątek D. & Kotowski W. (eds): Wetlands: Monitoring, Modelling, Management. 1st ed. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2007, p. 27-36. ISBN 978-0-415-40820-2.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Wetlands succession in Ruda Nature Reserve, Czech Republic
Name in Czech Sukcese mokřadní vegetace v NPR Ruda, Česká Republika
Authors NAVRÁTIL, Josef (203 Czech Republic) and Jana NAVRÁTILOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition 1. vyd. London, Okruszko S. T., Maltby E., Szatyłowicz J., Świątek D. & Kotowski W. (eds): Wetlands: Monitoring, Modelling, Management. p. 27-36, 10 pp. 2007.
Publisher Taylor & Francis Group
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Proceedings paper
Field of Study 10600 1.6 Biological sciences
Country of publisher Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form printed version "print"
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14310/07:00057163
Organization unit Faculty of Science
ISBN 978-0-415-40820-2
UT WoS 000252067700005
Keywords in English vegetation; wetlands; monitoring; changes; succession
Tags AKR, changes, Monitoring, rivok, succession, vegetation, wetlands
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Ing. Andrea Mikešková, učo 137293. Changed: 12/4/2013 12:52.
Abstract
Changes of vegetation between 1984 and 2004 were studied in Central-European fen (Natural Reserve Ruda). Two different methods usually used for monitoring vegetation changes were compared (i) repeating vegetation sampling and (ii) comparing vegetation maps using GIS. The results of both methods show succesional changes to more dense vegetation types. The difference between these two methods is in scale. The first method gives more detailed information about species composition, but it can miss changes in spatial composition of vegetation. In this case the second method is useful.
Abstract (in Czech)
Changes of vegetation between 1984 and 2004 were studied in Central-European fen (Natural Reserve Ruda). Two different methods usually used for monitoring vegetation changes were compared(i) repeating vegetation sampling and (ii) comparing vegetation maps using GIS. The results of both methods show succesional changes to more dense vegetation types. The difference between these two methods is in scale. The first method gives more detailed information about species composition, but it can miss changes in spatial composition of vegetation. In this case the second method is useful.
Links
GD524/05/H536, research and development projectName: Evolučně ekologická analýza biologických systémů: výzkumné centrum DSP
Investor: Czech Science Foundation, Evolutionary ecological analysis of biological systems: research centrum for PhD studies
MSM0021622416, plan (intention)Name: Diverzita biotických společenstev a populací: kauzální analýza variability v prostoru a čase
Investor: Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the CR, Diversity of Biotic Communities and Populations: Causal Analysis of variation in space and time
PrintDisplayed: 29/5/2024 06:05