Doklad ili razkaz? Kachestveno izsledvane na cenzurata v socialnite nauki v Chehiia, 1968-1989 godina.

OATES-INDRUCHOVÁ, Libora. Doklad ili razkaz? Kachestveno izsledvane na cenzurata v socialnite nauki v Chehiia, 1968-1989 godina. (Reporting or Story-telling?: Qualitative Research on Censorship in Czech Social Sciences, 1968-89.). Sociological Problems/Sociologicheski Problemi, Sociology and Interdisciplinary Knowledge. Sofia: Institute of Sociology Bulgarian Academy, 2007, vol. 2007, 1-2, p. 288-301. ISSN 0324-1572.

Basic information

• Original name: Doklad ili razkaz? Kachestveno izsledvane na cenzurata v socialnite nauki v Chehiia, 1968-1989 godina.
• Name in Czech: Zpráva z výzkumu nebo vyprávění? Kvalitativní výzkum cenzury v českých společenských vědách, 1968-89.
• Name (in English): Reporting or Story-telling?: Qualitative Research on Censorship in Czech Social Sciences, 1968-89.
• Authors: OATES-INDRUCHOVÁ, Libora (203 Czech Republic, guarantor).
• Edition: Sociological Problems/Sociologicheski Problemi, Sociology and Interdisciplinary Knowledge, Sofia, Institute of Sociology Bulgarian Academy, 2007, 0324-1572.

Other information

• Original language: Bulgarian
• Type of outcome: Article in a journal
• Field of Study: 50000 5. Social Sciences
• Country of publisher: Bulgaria
• Confidentiality degree: is not subject to a state or trade secret
• RIV identification code: RIV/00216224:14230/07:00020708
• Organization unit: Faculty of Social Studies
• Keywords in English: narrative research; interdisciplinarity; narratology; writing modes
• Tags: interdisciplinarity, narrative research, narratology, writing modes
• Tags: International impact, Reviewed

Abstract

If literary theory helps us to interpret imaginative texts, it should also enable us to construct texts that look like they are imaginative, but everything in them is based in (social) research. The article draws on research into academic publishing under authoritarian conditions: it began as research into language and ended as research into social and personal dynamics of text production. During the research a problem occured with writing up the research findings: academic mode of writing captured only a part of the story. A solution is presented: bringing together analytical methods of qualitative research and imaginative methods of textual presentation. The resulting text reinstates story as a writing mode for research reporting, while this practice additionally draws attention to the research process.

Abstract (in Czech)

If literary theory helps us to interpret imaginative texts, it should also enable us to construct texts that look like they are imaginative, but everything in them is based in (social) research. The article draws on research into academic publishing under authoritarian conditions: it began as research into language and ended as research into social and personal dynamics of text production. During the research a problem occured with writing up the research findings: academic mode of writing captured only a part of the story. A solution is presented: bringing together analytical methods of qualitative research and imaginative methods of textual presentation. The resulting text reinstates story as a writing mode for research reporting, while this practice additionally draws attention to the research process.

Abstract (in English)

If literary theory helps us to interpret imaginative texts, it should also enable us to construct texts that look like they are imaginative, but everything in them is based in (social) research. The article draws on research into academic publishing under authoritarian conditions: it began as research into language and ended as research into social and personal dynamics of text production. During the research a problem occured with writing up the research findings: academic mode of writing captured only a part of the story. A solution is presented: bringing together analytical methods of qualitative research and imaginative methods of textual presentation. The resulting text reinstates story as a writing mode for research reporting, while this practice additionally draws attention to the research process.

Links

• GA405/03/1056, research and development project: Name: Autocenzura a ´kódování ´ vědeckých textů v období normalizace, 1968-1989