Detailed Information on Publication Record
2007
Doklad ili razkaz? Kachestveno izsledvane na cenzurata v socialnite nauki v Chehiia, 1968-1989 godina.
OATES-INDRUCHOVÁ, LiboraBasic information
Original name
Doklad ili razkaz? Kachestveno izsledvane na cenzurata v socialnite nauki v Chehiia, 1968-1989 godina.
Name in Czech
Zpráva z výzkumu nebo vyprávění? Kvalitativní výzkum cenzury v českých společenských vědách, 1968-89.
Name (in English)
Reporting or Story-telling?: Qualitative Research on Censorship in Czech Social Sciences, 1968-89.
Authors
OATES-INDRUCHOVÁ, Libora (203 Czech Republic, guarantor)
Edition
Sociological Problems/Sociologicheski Problemi, Sociology and Interdisciplinary Knowledge, Sofia, Institute of Sociology Bulgarian Academy, 2007, 0324-1572
Other information
Language
Bulgarian
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50000 5. Social Sciences
Country of publisher
Bulgaria
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14230/07:00020708
Organization unit
Faculty of Social Studies
Keywords in English
narrative research; interdisciplinarity; narratology; writing modes
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 2/1/2008 14:54, doc. Libora Oates-Indruchová, Ph.D.
V originále
If literary theory helps us to interpret imaginative texts, it should also enable us to construct texts that look like they are imaginative, but everything in them is based in (social) research. The article draws on research into academic publishing under authoritarian conditions: it began as research into language and ended as research into social and personal dynamics of text production. During the research a problem occured with writing up the research findings: academic mode of writing captured only a part of the story. A solution is presented: bringing together analytical methods of qualitative research and imaginative methods of textual presentation. The resulting text reinstates story as a writing mode for research reporting, while this practice additionally draws attention to the research process.
In Czech
If literary theory helps us to interpret imaginative texts, it should also enable us to construct texts that look like they are imaginative, but everything in them is based in (social) research. The article draws on research into academic publishing under authoritarian conditions: it began as research into language and ended as research into social and personal dynamics of text production. During the research a problem occured with writing up the research findings: academic mode of writing captured only a part of the story. A solution is presented: bringing together analytical methods of qualitative research and imaginative methods of textual presentation. The resulting text reinstates story as a writing mode for research reporting, while this practice additionally draws attention to the research process.
In English
If literary theory helps us to interpret imaginative texts, it should also enable us to construct texts that look like they are imaginative, but everything in them is based in (social) research. The article draws on research into academic publishing under authoritarian conditions: it began as research into language and ended as research into social and personal dynamics of text production. During the research a problem occured with writing up the research findings: academic mode of writing captured only a part of the story. A solution is presented: bringing together analytical methods of qualitative research and imaginative methods of textual presentation. The resulting text reinstates story as a writing mode for research reporting, while this practice additionally draws attention to the research process.
Links
| GA405/03/1056, research and development project |
|