OATES-INDRUCHOVÁ, Libora. The Limits of Thought?: Regulatory Framework of Social Sciences and Humanities in Czechoslovakia (1968-1989). Europe-Asia Studies. Routledge, 2008, vol. 60, No 10, p. 1767-1782. ISSN 0966-8136. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668130802434620.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name The Limits of Thought?: Regulatory Framework of Social Sciences and Humanities in Czechoslovakia (1968-1989)
Name in Czech The Limits of Thought?: Regulatory Framework of Social Sciences and Humanities in Czechoslovakia (1968-1989)
Authors OATES-INDRUCHOVÁ, Libora (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Europe-Asia Studies, Routledge, 2008, 0966-8136.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 50401 Sociology
Country of publisher United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 0.734
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14230/08:00051006
Organization unit Faculty of Social Studies
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668130802434620
UT WoS 000261090000008
Keywords in English Czech Normalisation; regulation of social sciences; state socialism
Tags Czech Normalisation, regulation of social sciences, state socialism
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Michal Petr, učo 65024. Changed: 19/3/2020 22:07.
Abstract
The article outlines the main tendencies in the development of a regulatory framework of academic research in social sciences and humanities after the Soviet-led invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968 and during Normalisation (1969-1989). Throughout Normalisation the Communist Party asserted its will from the 'centre' to the 'periphery' of academic institutions, from the top of the institutional hierarchy all the way to the individual researchers, using a variety of strategies, with the aim of complete ideological control over academic research, publishing, and teaching. This centralising effort led to the inefficiency of the system, but only further research can explain the interaction between this dominant agent (the Party) and other actors involved in academic process.
Abstract (in Czech)
The article outlines the main tendencies in the development of a regulatory framework of academic research in social sciences and humanities after the Soviet-led invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968 and during Normalisation (1969-1989). Throughout Normalisation the Communist Party asserted its will from the 'centre' to the 'periphery' of academic institutions, from the top of the institutional hierarchy all the way to the individual researchers, using a variety of strategies, with the aim of complete ideological control over academic research, publishing, and teaching. This centralising effort led to the inefficiency of the system, but only further research can explain the interaction between this dominant agent (the Party) and other actors involved in academic process.
PrintDisplayed: 15/8/2024 16:22