LEWIS, S.C., C.P. WARLOW, A.R. BODENHAM, B. COLAM, P.M. ROTHWELL, D. TORGERSON, D. DELLAGRAMMATICAS, M. HORROCKS, C. LIAPIS, A.P. BANNING, M. GOUGH, M.J. GOUGH, Robert VLACHOVSKÝ, Robert STAFFA, Zdeněk GREGOR, Mojmír PŘÍVARA, David GOLDEMUND and Jana PAVLÍKOVÁ. General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. London, 2008, vol. 372, dec 20, p. 2132-2142. ISSN 0140-6736.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
Name in Czech Celková anestezie versus lokální anestezie při operaci krkavic (GALA): multicentrická, randomizovaná, kontrolovaná studie
Authors LEWIS, S.C. (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), C.P. WARLOW (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), A.R. BODENHAM (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), B. COLAM (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), P.M. ROTHWELL (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), D. TORGERSON (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), D. DELLAGRAMMATICAS (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), M. HORROCKS (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), C. LIAPIS (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), A.P. BANNING (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), M. GOUGH (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), M.J. GOUGH (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), Robert VLACHOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic), Robert STAFFA (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), Zdeněk GREGOR (203 Czech Republic), Mojmír PŘÍVARA (203 Czech Republic), David GOLDEMUND (203 Czech Republic) and Jana PAVLÍKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic).
Edition Lancet, London, 2008, 0140-6736.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30200 3.2 Clinical medicine
Country of publisher United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 28.409
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/08:00034563
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS 000261894000036
Keywords in English general anaesthesia; local anaesthesia; carotid surgery; trial
Tags carotid surgery, general anaesthesia, local anaesthesia, trial
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: prof. MUDr. Robert Staffa, Ph.D., učo 226. Changed: 30/6/2009 10:49.
Abstract
Background. The effect of carotid endarterectomy in lowering the risk of stroke ipsilateral to severe atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis is offset by complications during or soon after surgery. We compared surgery under general anaesthesia with that under local anaesthesia because prediction and avoidance of perioperative strokes might be easier under local anaesthesia than under general anaesthesia. Methods. We undertook a parallel group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial of 3526 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis from 95 centres in 24 countries. Participants were randomly assigned to surgery under general (n=1753) or local (n=1773) anaesthesia between June, 1999 and October, 2007. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with stroke (including retinal infarction), myocardial infarction, or death between randomisation and 30 days after surgery. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with Current Control Trials number ISRCTN00525237. Findings. A primary outcome occurred in 84 (4.8%) patients assigned to surgery under general anaesthesia and 80 (4.5%) of those assigned to surgery under local anaesthesia; three events per 1000 treated were prevented with local anaesthesia (95% CI 11 to 17; risk ratio [RR] 0.94 [95% CI 0.70 to 1.27]). The two groups did not significantly differ for quality of life, length of hospital stay, or the primary outcome in the prespecified subgroups of age, contralateral carotid occlusion, and baseline surgical risk. Interpretation. We have not shown a definite difference in outcomes between general and local anaesthesia for karotid surgery. The anaesthetist and surgeon, in consultation with the patient, should decide which anaesthetic technique to use on an individual basis.
Abstract (in Czech)
Celková anestezie versus lokální anestezie při operaci krkavic (GALA): multicentrická, randomizovaná, kontrolovaná studie. Celkem 3526 pacientů. Závěr: není jednoznačný rozdíl ve výsledcích karotické endarterektomie v celkové versus lokální anestezii.
PrintDisplayed: 26/7/2024 10:11