J 2006

Evaluation of the Impact of Inclusion Policies under the Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union: Assessing the Cultural Policies of Six Member States.

VAŠEČKA, Michal, Tove MALLOY a Michele GAZZOLA

Základní údaje

Originální název

Evaluation of the Impact of Inclusion Policies under the Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union: Assessing the Cultural Policies of Six Member States.

Název česky

Evaluace dopadu politik začleňování metodou otevřené koordinace (OMC) v EU: Analýza kulturních politik šesti členských států.

Autoři

VAŠEČKA, Michal, Tove MALLOY a Michele GAZZOLA

Vydání

ECMI Working Paper, Flensburg, European Centre for Minority Issues, 2006, 1435-9812

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50000 5. Social Sciences

Stát vydavatele

Německo

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL URL

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

Klíčová slova anglicky

minorities; culture policies; OMC method; inclusion; integration; employment policies; inter-cultural navigators

Štítky

culture policies, employment policies, inclusion, integration, inter-cultural navigators, Minorities, OMC method

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam
Změněno: 20. 3. 2010 12:43, Mgr. Lucie Galčanová Batista, Ph.D.

Anotace

ORIG CZ

V originále

There is a glaring lack of data collected by Member States in the area of immigrant inclusion and citizenship. Member States implement their common commitments in diverse ways. Member States tend to score consistently across the five areas. There are no major differences in policy between countries with long and short migration histories. Although statuses for immigrants are relatively difficult to acquire and weakly protected, they have significant rights associated with them. Naturalization remains one of the most problematic areas for Member States. This reflects the ongoing debate over whether migration should be seen as a long-term or temporary phenomenon.

Česky

There is a glaring lack of data collected by Member States in the area of immigrant inclusion and citizenship. Member States implement their common commitments in diverse ways. Member States tend to score consistently across the five areas. There are no major differences in policy between countries with long and short migration histories. Although statuses for immigrants are relatively difficult to acquire and weakly protected, they have significant rights associated with them. Naturalization remains one of the most problematic areas for Member States. This reflects the ongoing debate over whether migration should be seen as a long-term or temporary phenomenon.

Návaznosti

MSM0021622408, záměr
Název: Reprodukce a integrace společnosti (Akronym: IVRIS)
Investor: Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy ČR, Reprodukce a integrace společnosti
Zobrazeno: 9. 11. 2024 03:19