Detailed Information on Publication Record
2006
Evaluation of the Impact of Inclusion Policies under the Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union: Assessing the Cultural Policies of Six Member States.
VAŠEČKA, Michal, Tove MALLOY and Michele GAZZOLABasic information
Original name
Evaluation of the Impact of Inclusion Policies under the Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union: Assessing the Cultural Policies of Six Member States.
Name in Czech
Evaluace dopadu politik začleňování metodou otevřené koordinace (OMC) v EU: Analýza kulturních politik šesti členských států.
Authors
VAŠEČKA, Michal, Tove MALLOY and Michele GAZZOLA
Edition
ECMI Working Paper, Flensburg, European Centre for Minority Issues, 2006, 1435-9812
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50000 5. Social Sciences
Country of publisher
Germany
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Organization unit
Faculty of Social Studies
Keywords in English
minorities; culture policies; OMC method; inclusion; integration; employment policies; inter-cultural navigators
Tags
Tags
International impact
Změněno: 20/3/2010 12:43, Mgr. Lucie Galčanová Batista, Ph.D.
V originále
There is a glaring lack of data collected by Member States in the area of immigrant inclusion and citizenship. Member States implement their common commitments in diverse ways. Member States tend to score consistently across the five areas. There are no major differences in policy between countries with long and short migration histories. Although statuses for immigrants are relatively difficult to acquire and weakly protected, they have significant rights associated with them. Naturalization remains one of the most problematic areas for Member States. This reflects the ongoing debate over whether migration should be seen as a long-term or temporary phenomenon.
In Czech
There is a glaring lack of data collected by Member States in the area of immigrant inclusion and citizenship. Member States implement their common commitments in diverse ways. Member States tend to score consistently across the five areas. There are no major differences in policy between countries with long and short migration histories. Although statuses for immigrants are relatively difficult to acquire and weakly protected, they have significant rights associated with them. Naturalization remains one of the most problematic areas for Member States. This reflects the ongoing debate over whether migration should be seen as a long-term or temporary phenomenon.
Links
| MSM0021622408, plan (intention) |
|