VAŠEČKA, Michal, Tove MALLOY and Michele GAZZOLA. Evaluation of the Impact of Inclusion Policies under the Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union: Assessing the Cultural Policies of Six Member States. ECMI Working Paper. Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues, 2006, neuveden, No 32, 136 pp. ISSN 1435-9812.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Evaluation of the Impact of Inclusion Policies under the Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union: Assessing the Cultural Policies of Six Member States.
Name in Czech Evaluace dopadu politik začleňování metodou otevřené koordinace (OMC) v EU: Analýza kulturních politik šesti členských států.
Authors VAŠEČKA, Michal, Tove MALLOY and Michele GAZZOLA.
Edition ECMI Working Paper, Flensburg, European Centre for Minority Issues, 2006, 1435-9812.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 50000 5. Social Sciences
Country of publisher Germany
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL URL
Organization unit Faculty of Social Studies
Keywords in English minorities; culture policies; OMC method; inclusion; integration; employment policies; inter-cultural navigators
Tags culture policies, employment policies, inclusion, integration, inter-cultural navigators, Minorities, OMC method
Tags International impact
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Lucie Galčanová Batista, Ph.D., učo 41048. Changed: 20/3/2010 12:43.
Abstract
There is a glaring lack of data collected by Member States in the area of immigrant inclusion and citizenship. Member States implement their common commitments in diverse ways. Member States tend to score consistently across the five areas. There are no major differences in policy between countries with long and short migration histories. Although statuses for immigrants are relatively difficult to acquire and weakly protected, they have significant rights associated with them. Naturalization remains one of the most problematic areas for Member States. This reflects the ongoing debate over whether migration should be seen as a long-term or temporary phenomenon.
Abstract (in Czech)
There is a glaring lack of data collected by Member States in the area of immigrant inclusion and citizenship. Member States implement their common commitments in diverse ways. Member States tend to score consistently across the five areas. There are no major differences in policy between countries with long and short migration histories. Although statuses for immigrants are relatively difficult to acquire and weakly protected, they have significant rights associated with them. Naturalization remains one of the most problematic areas for Member States. This reflects the ongoing debate over whether migration should be seen as a long-term or temporary phenomenon.
Links
MSM0021622408, plan (intention)Name: Reprodukce a integrace společnosti (Acronym: IVRIS)
Investor: Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the CR, Reproduction and integration of society
PrintDisplayed: 26/7/2024 10:17