Detailed Information on Publication Record
2010
Spatial aspect of social exclusion and its interpretation on the level of everyday political practice.
GALČANOVÁ, LucieBasic information
Original name
Spatial aspect of social exclusion and its interpretation on the level of everyday political practice.
Authors
Edition
European Network for Housing Research (ENHR) Conference on Urban dynamics & housing change, 2010
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Prezentace na konferencích
Field of Study
50000 5. Social Sciences
Country of publisher
Turkey
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Organization unit
Faculty of Social Studies
Keywords in English
social exclusion; space; urbanism; purification; ethnicisation; local government and administration; qualitative research; Czech Republic
Změněno: 24/1/2011 14:20, Mgr. Lucie Galčanová Batista, Ph.D.
Abstract
V originále
Drawing on results of a qualitative study conducted in twelve Czech cities, we discuss how the so called “problematic localities” are represented within the narratives of local politicians and administrative workers. We analyse the ways in which are these localities categorized, and how these categorizations are used to legitimise the specific treatments of these places and their inhabitants. The city governance and administration is considered a part of a modern tradition of urban planning and city management, which is analysed in the first part of our study. The second empirical part of our text presents how the essentialist “common sense“ ethnicised attributes are activated and applied to the localities and their inhabitants in the nar-ratives of politicians and administrative workers. These attributes are associated with the im-age of impurity that leads to the need of surveillance, disciplination or purification. The ex-treme form of purification is represented by the displacement of the inhabitants and by the demolition of “contaminated” places. In analysing these narrative practices, we suggest that the borders of entitlement and the borders of responsibility are constructed. The borders of entitlement define who deserves the care provided by a state or a city; the borders of respon-sibility then delimit a symbolic space, in which a state or a city is perceived, by their represen-tatives, as being responsible for the situation of their inhabitants and citizens. Within the process of border formation, a crucial role is played by 1) the application of ethnicised catego-ries and inconsistent definitions of the objects of municipal and state care, as well as by 2) the forms of ownership of the housing stocks, where these objects, ergo people, live.
Links
MSM0021622408, plan (intention) |
|