DANIHELKA, Jiří, Kevin VAN DEN HOF, Thomas MARCUSSEN and Bengt JONSELL. Viola montana and V. persicifolia (Violaceae): Two names to be rejected. Taxon. Vienna: International Assoc. for Plant Taxonomy, vol. 59, No 6, p. 1869-1878. ISSN 0040-0262. 2010.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Viola montana and V. persicifolia (Violaceae): Two names to be rejected
Name in Czech Jména Viola montana a V. persicifolia (Violaceae) by měla být zamítnuta
Authors DANIHELKA, Jiří (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Kevin VAN DEN HOF (528 Netherlands), Thomas MARCUSSEN (578 Norway) and Bengt JONSELL (752 Sweden).
Edition Taxon, Vienna, International Assoc. for Plant Taxonomy, 2010, 0040-0262.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 10600 1.6 Biological sciences
Country of publisher Austria
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 2.364
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14310/10:00051843
Organization unit Faculty of Science
UT WoS 000285566000019
Keywords (in Czech) nomenklatura; typifikace; Viola elatior; V. stagnina; Viola subsect. Rostratae
Keywords in English nomenclature; typification; Viola elatior; V. stagnina; Viola subsect. Rostratae
Tags AKb, rivok
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Anísa Kabarová, učo 171777. Changed: 21/3/2012 15:13.
Abstract
The taxonomic and nomenclatural histories of Viola elatior Fr. (1828), V. pumila Chaix (1785) and V. stagnina Kit. ex Schult. (1814) are discussed. The names V. stagnina and V. elatior are lectotypified with specimens corresponding to the current use of these names. The neglected lectotypification in 1988 of V. montana L. (1753) with a specimen referable to V. elatior is reviewed. The name V. persicifolia Schreb. (1771) is analysed in detail, and we conclude that this name should be interpreted as referring also to V. elatior. In addition the types of V. hornemanniana Schult. (1819) and V. stipulacea Hartm. (1820) are conspecific with V. elatior. The use of V. persicifolia and V. montana, representing earlier legitimate names for the species widely known as V. elatior, and we herein recommend these two names for rejection in order to assure nomenclatural clarity and stability. We recommend conservation of V. elatior against V. hornemanniana and V. stipulacea.
Abstract (in Czech)
Práce se zabývá taxonomickou a nomenklatorickou historii druhů Viola elatior Fr. (1828), V. pumila Chaix (1785) a V. stagnina Kit. ex Schult. (1814) ve střední a západní Evropě. Jména V. stagnina a V. elatior are jsou lektotypifikována exempláři odpovídajícími současnému užití jmen. Krátce je připomenuta přehlížená lektotypifikace jména V. montana L. (1753) z roku 1988, a to exemplářem odpovídajícím druhu V. elatior. Detailní analýza jména V. persicifolia Schreb. (1771), které se užívá v některých květenách namísto jména V. stagnina, ukázala, že toto jméno by mělo být interpretováno jako vztahující se k V. elatior. Podobně se k tomuto druhu vztahují i V. hornemanniana Schult. (1819) a V. stipulacea Hartm. (1820). Jména V. persicifolia a V. montana, dlouhodobě používaná v konfliktním smyslu, jsou v zájmu jednoznačnosti a stability nomenklatury, doporučena k zamítnutí. Ze stejných důvodů doporučujeme konzervaci jména V. elatior oproti V. hornemanniana a V. stipulacea.
Links
LC06073, research and development projectName: Centrum pro výzkum biodiverzity
Investor: Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the CR, Biodiversity Research Center
MSM0021622416, plan (intention)Name: Diverzita biotických společenstev a populací: kauzální analýza variability v prostoru a čase
Investor: Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the CR, Diversity of Biotic Communities and Populations: Causal Analysis of variation in space and time
PrintDisplayed: 19/4/2024 11:02