Access of Citizens to the Court of Justice: The Role of Regulatory Acts

BLAHUŠIAK, Igor. Access of Citizens to the Court of Justice: The Role of Regulatory Acts. In Dny práva – 2010 – Days of Law, The conference proceedings. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2010, 22 pp. ISBN 978-80-210-5305-2.

Basic information

• Original name: Access of Citizens to the Court of Justice: The Role of Regulatory Acts
• Authors: BLAHUŠIAK, Igor.
• Edition: Brno, Dny práva – 2010 – Days of Law, The conference proceedings, 22 pp. 2010.
• Publisher: Masarykova univerzita

Other information

• Original language: Slovak
• Type of outcome: Proceedings paper
• Field of Study: 50500 5.5 Law
• Country of publisher: Czech Republic
• Confidentiality degree: is not subject to a state or trade secret
• Organization unit: Faculty of Law
• ISBN: 978-80-210-5305-2
• Keywords (in Czech): Európska únia, Súdny dvor, regulačné akty, občania, prípustnosť
• Keywords in English: European Union, Court of Justice, regulatory acts, citizens, admissibility

Abstract

Lisabonská zmluva zmenila znenie ustanovenia býv. čl. 230 Zmluvy o založení ES týkajúceho sa žalôb na neplatnosť právnych aktov európskeho práva. V súčasnosti platné ust. čl. 264 Zmluvy o fungovaní EÚ umožňuje jednotlivcovi podávať žaloby na neplatnosť nielen tých aktov, ktoré sa ho priamo osobne dotýkajú, ale taktiež na neplatnosť regulačných aktov, ktoré sa jej priamo týkajú a nevyžadujú vykonávacie opatrenia. V tomto príspevku sa preskúmame otázku, či daná zmena znamenala rozšírenie možností prístupu jednotlivca k Súdnemu dvoru alebo nie

Abstract (in English)

Lisbon Treaty has changed the provision of former Art. 230 of the Treaty establishing the EC, on the actions against the legality of acts of the EU/EC law. The provision of the Art. 264 of the Treaty on Functioning of the EU, which is effective nowadays, empowers an individual not only to institute proceedings on legality of acts of their direct and individual concern, but also against regulatory act which is of direct concern to them and does not entail implementing measures. This contribution will analyse the issue whether the aforementioned change constitutes a widening of possibilities of an individual to institute a proceedings before the Court of Justice or not.