Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{944417, author = {Smejkalová, Terezie}, article_location = {Poland}, article_number = {5}, keywords = {narrative; judicial discourse; judicial decision making; legal language; argumentation}, language = {eng}, issn = {2080-5926}, journal = {Comparative Legilinguistics}, title = {Story-telling in Judicial Discourse}, volume = {Neuveden}, year = {2011} }
TY - JOUR ID - 944417 AU - Smejkalová, Terezie PY - 2011 TI - Story-telling in Judicial Discourse JF - Comparative Legilinguistics VL - Neuveden IS - 5 SP - 89-103 EP - 89-103 SN - 20805926 KW - narrative KW - judicial discourse KW - judicial decision making KW - legal language KW - argumentation N2 - Judicial discourse and the style of written judicial decisions has been subject of numerous analyses. Judicial discourse comprises different elements from formal and structural ones to various modes of argumentation used. Narrative – when approached as a form or a structure – may be helpful in thorough analyses of judicial discourse, in particular the texts of judgements. This paper analyzes one judgement of a Czech court by means of narrative analysis and tackles the issues of narrative differentiation, narrative structure and narrative coherence in relation to judicial decision-making. Furthermore, it addresses the issue of story-telling and its importance within judicial discourse. ER -
SMEJKALOVÁ, Terezie. Story-telling in Judicial Discourse. \textit{Comparative Legilinguistics}. Poland, 2011, Neuveden, No~5, p.~89-103, 14 pp. ISSN~2080-5926.
|