VALDHANS, Jiří and Martin ORGONÍK. La Arbitrabilidad Limitada de los Litigios Surgidos de las Infracciones del Derecho de la Competencia Y la Posibilidad de Su Reconocimiento En Cumplimiento del Convenio de Nueva York (Limited Arbitrability of Disputes Arising Out of Competition Law Infridgements And Possibility of Its Recognition Pursuant to New York Convention). In Pedro, L, Ledasma, C. Sáenz J, Suárez, C, Gilsanz, J. La Aplicación Privada Del Derecho de la Competencia. Valladolid: Lex Nova, 2011, p. 377-386. ISBN 978-84-9898-339-5.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name La Arbitrabilidad Limitada de los Litigios Surgidos de las Infracciones del Derecho de la Competencia Y la Posibilidad de Su Reconocimiento En Cumplimiento del Convenio de Nueva York
Name (in English) Limited Arbitrability of Disputes Arising Out of Competition Law Infridgements And Possibility of Its Recognition Pursuant to New York Convention
Authors VALDHANS, Jiří (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Martin ORGONÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution).
Edition Valladolid, La Aplicación Privada Del Derecho de la Competencia, p. 377-386, 10 pp. 2011.
Publisher Lex Nova
Other information
Original language Spanish
Type of outcome Proceedings paper
Field of Study 50500 5.5 Law
Country of publisher Spain
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14220/11:00050093
Organization unit Faculty of Law
ISBN 978-84-9898-339-5
Keywords in English Arbitrability; competition Law; private enforcement; new york convention; recognition
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: doc. JUDr. Jiří Valdhans, Ph.D., učo 13652. Changed: 27/10/2011 00:16.
Abstract
There is diversity between countries in many issues of arbitration, for instance each country regulates, inter alia, its own conditions for arbitrability. The most common claims arising from the breach of competition law (declaratory relief, claims for damages, etc.) are arbitrable in some countries, but not in others. This may cause problems in enforcement of arbitral awards in foreign countries, since the lack of arbitrability in the State of enforcement is very basic reason for the refusal to recognize the arbitration award. This leads into a discrepancy between the likelihood of recognition and enforcement, first, of court decisions (under the Brussels I Regulation) and secondly, of arbitration awards (under New York Convention).
Abstract (in English)
There is diversity between countries in many issues of arbitration, for instance each country regulates, inter alia, its own conditions for arbitrability. The most common claims arising from the breach of competition law (declaratory relief, claims for damages, etc.) are arbitrable in some countries, but not in others. This may cause problems in enforcement of arbitral awards in foreign countries, since the lack of arbitrability in the State of enforcement is very basic reason for the refusal to recognize the arbitration award. This leads into a discrepancy between the likelihood of recognition and enforcement, first, of court decisions (under the Brussels I Regulation) and secondly, of arbitration awards (under New York Convention).
Links
GP407/08/P624, research and development projectName: Delikty z pohledu mezinárodního práva soukromého
Investor: Czech Science Foundation, Torts from the perspective of the private international law
PrintDisplayed: 22/7/2024 22:00