Detailed Information on Publication Record
2011
Rome I Regulation and the Law Applicable to Internet-Related Consumer Contracts
KYSELOVSKÁ, TerezaBasic information
Original name
Rome I Regulation and the Law Applicable to Internet-Related Consumer Contracts
Name in Czech
Nařízení Řím I a právo rozhodné pro online spotřebitelské smlouvy
Authors
KYSELOVSKÁ, Tereza (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
1. vyd. Györ, Az állam és jog alapvető értékei II. Győr : Széchenyi István Egyetem Állam - és Jogtudományi Doktori Iskola, p. 92-97, 196 pp. 2011
Publisher
Széchenyi István Egyetem Állam - és Jogtudományi Doktori Iskola
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Stať ve sborníku
Field of Study
50500 5.5 Law
Country of publisher
Hungary
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Publication form
printed version "print"
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14220/11:00053866
Organization unit
Faculty of Law
ISBN
978-963-7175-60-2
Keywords (in Czech)
Nařízení Řím I; právo rozhodné;spotřebitelské smlouvy; internet; zaměřování činnosti
Keywords in English
Rome I regulation;law applicable; consumer contracts; internet;directing of activities
Tags
Změněno: 1/2/2023 11:26, doc. JUDr. Tereza Kyselovská, Ph.D.
Abstract
V originále
Protection of weaker party in contractual process is one of the fundamental values of the law of contract. The connecting factor for internet-related consumer contracts in harmonized European legal norms can be described as from “specific invitation or advertising” to “international targeting”. The choice of law rules for consumer contracts must be clear, predictable and provide efficient protection for consumers who contract electronically. According to Rome I Regulation the law of consumer’s habitual residence applies to all consumer contracts. Careful consideration should be given to term “directing such activities”. This connecting factor is of little use in electronic consumer contracts unless it is clearly defined. The analyzed hypothesis of this contribution is following: The conditions upon which the choice of law rules for consumer contracts operates are not sufficient to consumer contracts concluded by means of electronic commerce. This hypothesis will be analyzed on doctrinal approaches and current case-law concerning online consumer contracts.